488. TRANSFORMATION TO ACTUAL "PEOPLES DEMOCRACY".

 

488. TRANSFORMATION TO ACTUAL "PEOPLES DEMOCRACY" FROM "BOURGEOIS DEMOCRACY".

//

THE NET RESULT OF OLD "SOVIET UNION" (USSR) IS THAT IT CAUSED THE "MODERN PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY" AND BEFORE THE HUGE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE, ALL "KINGDOMS" AND "LAND LORDS" BECAME ONLY PART OF HISTORY. NOW WORKING CLASS CAN DECIDE THEIR FUTURE AS WHAT THEY WANT THE HELL OF CAPITALISM OR THE HEAVEN OF SOCIALISM THROUGH THEIR SINGLE "VOTE".

THANKS TO THE GREAT "KARL MARX".

 //

"BOURGEOIS" DEMOCRACY HAVE TO BE CHANGED AS "PEOPLES" DEMOCRACY" AND IT WILL BE POSSIBLE ONLY ALONG WITH SOCIALISM. Political parties operating in a democratic system have no "permanent" electorate. Because "vote" belongs to every citizen. They do not guarantee anyone that they will always vote for someone. In India, those who had voted for the Indian National Congress later did not give it to the Congress. They cannot think that the votes BJP is getting now are "permanent".

//

Indian Parliament already admitted the target of SOCIALIST INDIA with 4/5th majority and CONSTITUTION changes also admitted accordingly and the peoples verdict is still existing even though INC failed to implement it. Those peoples also still living in this country and they want Socialist economy. The "COMMUNIST MOVEMENTS" of India are bound to admit the "PEOPLES" verdict as 4/5th portion of Indians admitting the contents of SOCIALISM. If they come forward to implement the contents of Indian Constitution, present India to become a "SOCIALIST INDIA" certainly the peoples will vote for Indian COMMUNIST MOVEMENTS....But it is a fact that those who took up arms and fought against SOCIALISM in the old Soviet Union found that they could no longer use the old weapons as such when democracy came into effect. Instead, they find a way to organize the workers themselves with ANTI SOCIALIST IDEOLOGIES, spread pure lies against Marxism and socialist ideology, and kill workers if possible. Unfortunately those who have to bring the socialist ideology to the people are taking a firm stand that socialism has no enemies and giving all support to strengthen capitalist--bourgeois ideologies.

 //

Actually "BOURGEOIS" are against "democracy" in its real meaning and they want only to cheat "peoples". When "peoples" voting for "Indian National Congress" and when INC candidates elected; they will become "BJP". And the ruling will become "BJP". Those peoples voted for INC can do nothing and these type of cheating is common in "BOURGEOIS DEMOCRACY". According to MARXISM, "peoples" should not be cheated in any circumstances and the ruling should be protecting the interest of "PEOPLES" and then only "PEOPLES DEMOCRACY" can be in force and it can be ensured only in SOCIALISM.  ACTUAL "PEOPLES DEMOCRACY " WILL BE USED AS "WEAPON" AGAINST "BOURGEOISIE DEMOCRACY" BECAUSE ACTUALLY THERE ARE ONLY CHEATING THE PEOPLES THROUGH THE WORD "DEMOCRACY" AS BASIC POLITICS OF BOURGEOISIE IS BUSINESS TO MAKE MONEY IN ANY WAY THROUGH SCAM.

//

If the exploitative class political parties using anti-democratic method against working class with intention that they should not become a political force, the working class will also have to respond in their own way. It is their responsibility to avoid such reactions from the side of working class. Attack the backward classes with the spirit of "High Caste"; killing party workers, spreading outright lies, attacking election losers, setting fire to their houses and not allowing them to contest elections are not things that come in democracy.

//

"MARXISM" is "SCIENCE" and "SCIENCE" will admit changing of everything. "DEMOCRACY" OVERTHROWN "MONARCHY" FROM THE WORLD ITSELF WHICH WAS THE POWER OF MARXISM, WHICH GOT IN OLD USSR UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF COM.JOSEPH STALIN; AND THOSE SPARED THEIR LIFE OF 1.5 CRORES COMRADES OF OLD USSR. RED SALUTE TO THE COMRADES OF OLD USSR. (See my blog 488/489 also)

//

Even though BOURGEOIS using PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY, they can't admit "democracy" in its real meaning, because their "media" is money, and in its real meaning, DEMOCRACY is based on "PEOPLES" and its media is love among each other. Bourgeois will never admit unbiased journalism or unbiased judiciary. All "BOURGEOIS AND ANTI SOCIALS" are one and same to fight against LDF MINISTRY of Kerala because they want to evict one "COMMUNIST" Ministry ruling in India. Actually their fear is only against SOCIALISM, and so they want to wipe out it from Kerala also. They are not admitting the "democracy" of Kerala Ministry, because their intention is against socialism.

. .Exactly, "MODERN PARLIAMENTARY" democracy have some effect of the birth and the growth of old "USSR" and situations were changed all over the world after 2nd WORLD WAR. To defeat Germany, about 1.5 Crores men of old USSR had lost their life and their victory was very hard which was actually the power of MARXISM, and if USSR had failed, the victory of NAZI/FACIST forces had been prevented even the present modern Parliamentary democracy. When "CHINA" also in the field of "SOCIALISM", about 2/3rd portion of world population became socialist, which also have some good effect in MODERN PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY. A very good effect of "democracy" is freedom of opinion/media which give right of information, which enables COMMUNIST MOVEMENTS have right to teach about MARXISM AND SOCIALISM IN WORKING CLASS AND COMMON PEOPLES; and if the victory of 2nd world war with NAZI/FASCIST FORCES; these benefits will certainly denied. (Unfortunately, then "COMMUNISTS" decided to promote CAPITALISM OR EXPLOITATION AS "MARXISM). . //

.......The old Soviet Union itself was the result of World War I and the great Lenin and how the philosophy of Marxism works with socialism. World War I was from 1914 to 1919. The "October Revolution" takes place in 1917, when the Tsarist Russian army was at war with Germany. After the war, the T"zar's army returned and waged a four-year "counter-revolution" under the leadership of "Kolchak" against the Soviet Union, but the Soviet Union was victorious in the end. The history of "RED ARMY''s victory of the four-year counter-revolutionary subversive struggle proves that if the proletariat adopts the philosophy of "Marxism" along with socialism, it cannot be defeated by any force. But two and a half crore people died there. Yet the fact that the Soviet Union does not exist today proves that socialism can only survive with the full cooperation of the people. A modern parliamentary democracy is the most effective for the success of socialism.

//

Actually it is only foolishness that considering while promoting CAPITALISM, "PEOPLES" democracy is possible. In actual "FEUDALISM", the "LAND LORDS" had worked with some extra powers, even judicial powers with death punishment and such powers were assigned them by the "KING" and the "KINGS" were considered as the delegate of the "GOD". Those were only a part of "HISTORY" and nothing existing at present. Owners of landed property are not "FEUDAL LORDS" and at present they also have only one "VOTE" like all others. Actually, the landed property system now existing in most part of India, is only a part of history; which was a part of old feudalism (KING'S REGIME). During Kings' regime, the feudal lords had liability to protect the King by rendering soldiers when required and to protect the soldiers, King had entrusted a large portion of land with the land lords and which land is even now, enjoying their predecessors have to be reviewed as Kings' regime only a part of history and now, the period is democracy. It is only natural justice that those zero land also have right to possess landed property at least for natural necessities just like making house and burial places, and it should be a constitutional right of everybody.

//

1."MODERN PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY" must be compared to the ancient "KINGS' REGIME" where no "POLITICAL FREEDOM" to anybody and everybody had been considered only as dependent of the KING, and the "KING'S authority were considered as "established by the "GOD" and the authority of the "KING" were considered as permanent. When anybody misleading DEMOCRACY through their money, religion, etc. cannot be a reason to blame "democracy" as those are actually not the default of democracy, only misleading and cheating the general public. And also "VOTERS" not guaranteeing to anybody that they will vote for ever and the vote will depend the actions those elected, that is the merit of democracy. "COMMUNIST MOVEMENTS" have also rights to present actually they want to be implemented before the CITIZENS and get their verdict and their "indifference" or negligence to present "SCIENTIFIC SOCIALISM" is not the defect of Indian democracy.

//

2. In "MONARCHY" there was a CENTER of POWER, which decided everything which was deadly against the interest of the peoples. Then there were only possibility of ARMED REVOLUTION and no other way to get any changes in the society. So the peoples in general supported ARMED REVOLUTIONS and which caused the present PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY. The PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY, came in effect only in 20th century; those electing only for a short period and if they are not elected in the next election, they have no powers to do anything. Somebody keeping even now also to get the power through "ARMED REVOLUTION" without considering the facility to propagate socialist ideology in common peoples only make distance to socialist ideologies. Those who are teaching MARXSISM in remote forest areas also can teach the common peoples in public and they can convince the peoples about its justice, but it was not allowed in India before 1947 or in MONARCHY, and those facts ignoring those comrades, and the "VOTERS" will "VOTE" for socialism, if they convinced the justice of socialism and the social science of MARXSISM, behind the justice of socialism. That is "man power of workers" creating everything, and "they" also deserves proper living in this "EARTH".

/

3. The "democracy" prevailing all over the world after 20th centuary providing some thing other than what was existed at the period of Karl Marx. Its main features are each citizens having "POLITICAL FREEDOM"; which was impossible during the period of actual KINGS' regime. Every citizens having the right to become a candidate to any post and also they can nominate anybody to any post as candidate to be elected. And also they have right to form POLITICAL ORGANIZATIONS, and can decide who must rule them, and they can "VOTE" them as expressing their "OPINION" as their decision to rule. The most important aspect of democracy is that the VOTE is secret which will protect the VOTER and which will give him self confidence also to take suitable selections. These facilities are the main features of democracy, which were unimaginable during per-democratic period (KINGS' REGIME). Due to these features, "STREET RIOTS" became out of date as there are no participation of all citizens in "street riots".

//

.WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING ACTUAL FACTS; SOME "MARXISTS" WILL SUGGEST SOME FOOLISHNESS AND ALL OTHER FRAUDS WILL ADMIT EVERY FOOLISHNESS. THIS CAUSED SOME MISUNDERSTANDINGS ABOUT "DEMOCRACY" WHICH CAUSED ABOUT TO CEASE THE GROWTH OF WORLD COMMUNIST MOVEMENTS ITSELF. THEIR ACTUAL INTENTION IS ONLY DENYING THE SOCIAL JUSTICE OF "SOCIALISM" TO WORKING CLASS AND COMMON PEOPLES. EVERYBODY WANTS ONLY "FREE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM" AND THE RESULT IS BJP RULING AND ZERO COMMUNIST PARTY IN INDIA. EVERYBODY WANT EXPLOITATION ON WORKING CLASS IN THE NAME OF KARL MARX. THOSE WHO ARE USING THE NAME "KARL MARX" AND THE WORD "MARXISM" WITHOUT THE TARGET OF SOCIALIST SOCIETY ARE ONLY "FRAUD MARXIST" AS MARX INTRODUCED THE IDEOLOGY ONLY FOR SOCIALISM AND EXPLOITATION FREE SOCIETY. THE "WAY" HOW TO REACH IN SOCIALISM IS NOT A PART OF MARXISM.

//

They will swallow some "words" without understanding its meaning and the word "democracy" is also one among them. They can't use the word "democracy" without the word "bourgeoisie". Actually they don't know the difference of India, before 1947 and after 1947. And also they don't know the situation when Indian Parliament admitted India as a "REPUBLIC" with the contents of "SOVEREIGN; SECULAR; DEMOCRATIC, SOCIALIST". Certainly there were some history for the word "bourgeoisie democracy" because in the history, only ELITE GROUPS (LORDS) had right to present matters in "PARLIAMENT" but after admiting "MODERN PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY" all over the world, after 2nd WORLD WAR, democracy with main "FOUR PILLARS", the matters were totally changed. The main features of Indian democracy are:

(1) LEGISLATURE (2) EXECUTIVE (3) JUDICIARY (4). FREEDOM OF OPINION/MEDIA.

//12 11 2022//

///////////////

500. SOCIALISM - IN "INDIAN MODEL".

Without admitting "SOCIALIST INDIA", defeating BJP is impossible. A "SINGLE VOTE" IS ENOUGH AND MORE FOR A NEW "SECULAR INDIA".

//

Like "MATHEMATICS", MARXISM also only can work on THEORITICAL base. When saying that "THERE ARE NO CLASS ENEMIES", means only neglecting CLASS STRUGGLE THEORY, and declining MARXSISM in total. This is following since 1950s in India. When "PROMOTING CAPITALISM", "MARXSISM" can't be in field.

//

A homeless-free Kerala is the target of the "Left Front" in Kerala. If the target of the Left Front is changed to "INDIA" without Homeless", the Left Front will rule India without further delay. Your single "VOTE" is enough for it.

The philosophy of "Marxism" has the capacity to do so. It only requires the CPI(M) to accept the Party "PROGRAMME" of "SOCIALIST INDIA".

//

The nature of CAPITALISM is "ADANI" AND "NARENDRA MODI". But in the issue of pay wage to employees, "BOURGEOISE" are one and same. Low wage of employees and low price of "farm products" will certainly reduce the industrial growth in general. How much reduce the wage, how much make profit more and more, how much cheat the society, etc. "ADANI" is only one example and the nature of bourgeoise political parties. Only in SOCIALISM, the stage of empolyees and adequate prices for farm products can be make good.

//

Everythings changing in each second; which is not the control of anybody; as old "COMPUTERS; LAND PHONES; and also "BRITISH RULING" changed even though they didn't liked so)//SO, SOCIALISM IN "INDIAN MODEL"//

.

. . .As "HISTORY" cannot repeat as such anywhere and those who are waiting to repeat OCTOBER REVOLUTION OR CHINESE REVOLUTION is impossible in India and also USSR also only in history and the method admitted in "CHINA" is entirely different from old SOVIET UNION and also transformation to SOCIALISM from CAPITALISM possible only with the "PEOPLES" consent, as in "DEMOCRACY" actual "POLITICAL POWERS" vested in common peoples. And also, the situations existing in India is entirely different from other countries, because in India the country is "SOVEREIGN, DEMOCRATIC, SOCIALIST, SECULAR REPUBLIC". The peculiarities of democracy is that each citizens are having "POLITICAL FREEDOM" and the "CONSTITUTION" also admitting with the contents of "SOCIALISM" also and there are no definition insisted its nature of SOCIALISM, and the peoples can decide what should be it. The right of "opinion" intends right of media and also through this facility, there are no ban on COMMUNIST MOVEMENTS and this facility were not existed in old RUSSIA or before 1947 in India. So in India, the "SOCIALISM" can be implemented tghrough getting peoples verdict through the democracy existing in India.

//

Admitting Indian Constitution means admitting SOCIALISM as well. Karl Marx, Engels or no one had determined the "model" of socialism in all countries. The exploiters are trying to establish that because the old Soviet Union is gone, socialism and Marxism also vanished. The co-operation of the people in democracy is also more effective in the production of socialist society. The fact that parliamentary democracy has no legal barriers to bring socialist ideas among the people makes socialism more popular. Such were not the conditions in Russia in 1917 when the October Revolution took place. The opinion of some people that parliamentary democracy is not suitable for scientific socialism is only an expression of opinion arising from ignorance of what is Marxism and Socialism.

//

MALE - FEMALE EQUALITY OF THE CONSTITUTION. Under the Constitutional law, women have equal rights as men so as to enable them to take part effectively in the administrative of the country. How can it justify as per MARXSISM?

. .Scientific views in social life cannot be formed without "SOCIALISM" which "MARXSISM" admits. The scientism of the physical argument is essential to the fight against communalism and to point out the uniqueness of the "female body" in the existence of life, to expose the discrimination shown by all religions against women. Unity and struggle between opposites is manifested in living beings through the male-female structure. A man and a man or a woman and a woman do not create a new child. A child can only be born when a perfect woman and a perfect man come together. Very rarely bacteria' virus etc. ; this is the mechanism of nature in all living things. Contradictory physical argument is just natural law like "breathing" (IN & OUT), It is the basis of scientific acceptance of "MARXSISM" which no one can deny. And also there are enough and more Articles in Indian Constitution itself for a SOCIALIST COUNTRY such as Article 14 insisting "equality" among citizens; (Only those admitting MARXSISM can be implemented this Article successfully). Article 51A(h) insisting "SCIENTIFIC TEMPRE" AS "FUNDAMENTAL DUTY OF EVERY CITIZENS"; Without admitting "MATERIALISM AND DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM", it is impossible to implement Article 51A(h) of Indian Constitution, which stressing "SCIENTIFIC TEMPER" should admit as "FUNDAMENTAL DUTY" of every citizens. Art.19 - freedom of opinion which enables to teach MARXSISM also in public; which were prevented during monarchy, as the Constitution itself "SOVEREIGN, SOCIALIST, DEMOCRATIC, SECU8LAR REPUBLIC OF INDIA". We want only to follow strictly implementing the Articles of Indian Constitution, as it was prepared by Dr B R Ambedkar.

//

. .There were no directions issued by KARL MARX; FREDERIC ENGELS; LENIN OR ANYBODY THAT "WHAT SHOULD BE SOCIALISM" in each country. They had invented only some ideas about the society; how the wealth of the country being built on; what is the reasons of poverty; etc. To establish SOCIALISM in India; we should have find out our own solutions; because we cannot follow any other countries as such in India. We could have corrected so many misunderstandings as almost all Comrades are keeping in their mind. And also there are enough and more Articles in Indian Constitution itself for a SOCIALIST COUNTRY such as Article 14 insisting "equality" among citizens; Article 51A(h) insisting "SCIENTIFIC TEMPRE" AS "FUNDAMENTAL DUTY OF EVERY CITIZENS"; Art.19 - freedom of opinion which enables to teach MARXSISM also in public; which were prevented during monarchy, as the Constitution itself "SOVEREIGN, SOCIALIST, DEMOCRATIC, SECU8LAR REPUBLIC OF INDIA". We want only to follow strictly implementing the Articles of Indian Constitution, as it was prepared by Dr B R Ambedkar.

.

At present, "GOVERNMENT" not considering to solve any problems of the CITIZENS, as they are considering that their duty is only protecting the "CORPORATES" because they will provide them money as much Crores they want and in return, all burdens should have afford the peoples of the country. But when the concept of SOCIALIST COUNTRY admitted, to solve the problems of the peoples will be the normal function of the "GOVERNMENT" because SOCIALISM is to protect the peoples, while CAPITALISTS FORM OF GOVERNMENT is to cheat the peoples and peoples only victims of the bourgeoise political parties. If "FARMERS" getting adequate price for their agricultural products; that will protect not only farmers; but the society also protected through farmers. If they can maintain their "life" properly, certainly that will help to develop the industrial sector also. If they have proper income from the agricultural field, they will construct their house; they will purchase house hold articles; perhaps somebody will purchase vehicles for their family use; certainly these will help the industrial sector in the country as a whole. But, if they are getting only two rupees for per KG tomatto; onian, etc. there happening nothing, but only suicide of the farmers.

. .Along with the political freedom of every citizen in "democracy" there is also an element of "compromise". When the majority rules, the non-majority has all the rights. Later, if the opposition gets a majority, they can also become the ruling party. But no one should adopt violent behavior. There was no such situations in monarchy. In a democracy, the bourgeoisie and the Hindu communalists are not ready to accept this. That is the reason for the violent protests against the socialist ideals and the left-wing government in Kerala, even though there is a majority of the people. The important thing is that if no one is prepared for the fallout, the murders of each other will continue. Those who do not ready to accept democracy will continue to kill each other. The concept that "DEMOCRACY" is against "SOCIALISM" is only FOOLISHNESS, as if peoples convinced the justice of socialism; 99% will admit and accept the justice of socialism and nobody can defend the justice of MARXSISM AND SOCIALISM because each and every items of "COMMODITIES" are being made by common peoples and working class in general; and admitting their privileges are only natural justice. They also have right to live in better amenities along with all others.

. .The pathetic stage of farmers will also adversely affect farm laborers and they are suffering the worst situation through out the country. All over India, agricultural laborers cannot live without getting a minimum wage of at least five hundred rupees a day. They and their children deserve education and fair living conditions. If they get a wage of at least five hundred rupees per day, it will help their dreams to blossom and indirectly other people in the society will also benefit from it because each and every sectors of social life are socially connected. The result will be better industrial growth through out the country. At least 10 Crores "CYCLES" will have sale; 5 lakh scooters sales will be result and these will affect the society as a whole. But without a "GOVERNMENT OF LEFT IDEOLOGY UNDER SOCIALIST CONCEPT; INDIAN FARMERS CANNOT IMAGINE SUCH SITUATION IN INDIA. If CPI(M) suggesting such plans, the farmers of India will whole heartedly support such plans and it is possible as per the present Indian CONSTITUTION itself, because CONSTITUTION OF INDIA holding the concept "SOCIALIST" also.

...........As a best Parliamentary system prevailing in India; and as there is no ban to propagate SOCIALIST ideas in common peoples; we cannot follow any other countries. And also without parliamentary procedure, no legal and judicial establishment is possible. And also; the production method adopted in other countries also must be reviewed in India. In a society; everybody will try to find out their own livelihood in various fields; there is no necessity to prevent them in any field; as long as those are inevitable parts of the society. They must be encouraged to maximise their out put; they must be honoured as admitting their products also as a part of SOCIALIST ECONOMY; but they should not make any kind of hurt to others by unnecessary competitions resulting ruin of others. We must admit that about 90% of the common man can only follow others; and if the rest of 10% have goodness in their mind; that will help 100% citizens of the country in prosperity and to become a wealthy nation.

.

. . .But as a general matter, LAND OWNERSHIP must be with SOCIALIST COUNTRY, and it can be handled by local self Government and can be entrusted with individuals for the production of agricultural and other products and when they are misusing, it can be taken over by the Self Governments.

.

..........But this will help only a limited portion of the development of the nation. The country as a whole must be in socialist planning and that will only help the nation to reach entire peoples in a developed stage. Everybody can avail land and buildings according to their necessities. But as a whole the entire land of the country (mines, etc) under the control of the nation. By permitting any body to render their abilities for the development of the country; we can also see that they are doing their contribution for the socialist society. But everybody must see that the process of making any kind of goods/services are the outcome of a series of services of employees. It is a fact that every products in one stage will be a raw material in the next stage. Here we must remember the words of Karl Marx; that everything is created by the labourers by direct and indirect involvement of working class.

.

. .In a SOCIALIST SOCIETY, the main concept is free from exploitation of manpower of working class, and so the method of production as far as possible will be under public ownership. Then the profit of the firm can be utilised for the welfare of the country and certainly the living standard of employees will be uplifted. The "GOVERNMENT" taking the responsibility of residence, medical treatment and education of their children. But in capitalism, the "GOVERNMENT" only planning to exploit them more and more and denying permanent employment and enhancing working hours. The quality and quantity can be controlled by the state, prices of each items can be controlled by the state, and also preventing "BLACK MONEY" and "BLACK MARKETTING", tax evasion, providing employment opportunities to youth with adequate income with reservation benefits to SC/ST and others, which only lead the country to industrial growth, etc. When admitting as a part of SOCIALIST ECONOMY under MARXIAN IDEOLOGY, the case will be entirely different and employees themselves will make sure that the firm will be in profit and an ASSET of the country. It is possible only when the country as a whole admitting SOCIALIST ECONOMY only under MARXIAN IDEOLOGY and under working class leadership. Only then the country can be considered as a SOCIALIST COUNTRY. But in a capitalist society, even the profit of the firm can be used for the country as as whole. But bourgeois rulers are not ready to admit such facts as they are considering politics also as a commercial item, they will do anything with utter selfishness and a spirit of their earnings and exploitation of the total society is the main moto of bourgeois politics. So in a capitalist society, public sector undertakings will always in lose and burden of the State.

.

.Most of the "COMMUNIST LEADERS" are reluctant to admit "democracy" for implementing SOCIALISM, which only stressing their ingorance about "democracy". "DEMOCRACY" also had a very long history from its birth, but those are entirely different from what is actually now existing. Actually "bourgeoise" not ready to admit exact "democracy" because in its true spirit; democracy protecting the actual interest of "peoples" which can be possible only in SOCIALISM. See the name of China is "PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CHINA" where "MONEY" cannot rule the peoples as in CAPITALISM; only the interest of "MONEY" OR "BOURGEOISE" will be protected. In India, actually "MONEY" is ruling the country and each and every interest of "MON EY" OR "BOURGEOISE" is quite safe through BOURGEOISE POLITICIANS. Exactly, "MODERN PARLIAMENTARY" democracy have some effect of the birth and the growth of old "USSR" and situations were changed all over the world after 2nd WORLD WAR. To defeat Germany, about 1.5 Crores men of old USSR had lost their life and their victory was very hard which was actually the power of MARXSISM, and if USSR had failed, the victory of NAZI/FACIST forces had been prevented even the present modern Parliamentary democracy. When "CHINA" also in the field of "SOCIALISM", about 2/3rd portion of world population became socialist, which also have some good effect in MODERN PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY.

.

A very good effect of "democracy" is freedom of opinion/media which give right of information, which enables COMMUNIST MOVEMENTS have right to teach about MARXSISM AND SOCIALISM IN WORKING CLASS AND COMMON PEOPLES; and if the victory of 2nd world war with NAZI/FACIST FORCES; these benefits will certainly denied. (Unfortunately, then "COMMUNISTS" decided to promote CAPITALISM OR EXPLOITATION AS "MARXSISM). As "INDIAN COMMUNIST" leaders are stern that they will only follow for establishing SOCIALISM in India through the method what had happened in old SOVIET UNION which known as "OCTOBER REVOLUTION HAPPENED IN 1917". As they know that the situations prevailing in India is entirely different from what was in old RUSSIA, but they don't know anything else to be done in India. It is the reason that both Communist Parties (CPI & CPI(M)) are reluctant to mention even the word "SOCIALISM" in India.

.

.But it is a fact that the so called "SOVIET UNION" is now only in history, and nothing can be followed in India. But the situations prevailing in India is entirely different from what was at Russia. In India, even the CONSTITUTION itself admitting "SOVEREIGN, SOCIALIST, DEMOCRATIC, SECULAR, REPUBLIC" and the "SOCIALIST" concept already admitted by the huge majority of India with 4/5 portions of Indian CITIZENS. As in "democracy" the political powers holding with the CITIZENS, if the COMMUNIST LEADERS asking peoples verdict for implementing SOCIALISM in India through admitting the peculiarities existing in India, certainly huge majority of peoples will admit India also moving towards socialism with Indian specifications.

It is a fact that "HISTORY WILL NOT REPEAT AS SUCH". There were no directions issued by KARL MARX; FREDERIC ENGELS; LENIN OR ANYBODY THAT "WHAT SHOULD BE SOCIALISM" in each country. They had invented only some ideas about the society; how the wealth of the country being built on; what is the reasons of poverty; etc. To establish SOCIALISM in India; we should have find out our own solutions; because we cannot follow any other countries as such in India.We could have corrected so many misunderstandings as almost all Comrades are keeping in their mind. And also there are enough and more Articles in Indian Constitution itself for a SOCIALIST COUNTRY. The most important Article of the Constitution is Article 14, which specifying "equality" among citizens; and only admitting MARXSISM the content of this Articles can be implemented successfully. And also Article 51A(h) specifying "SCIENTIFIC TEMPRE" become fundamental duty of each CITIZENS, is apt for defending caste menace of India.

.

.We want only to follow strictly implementing the Articles of Indian Constitution, as it was prepared by Dr B R Ambedkar and also changes can be made in the CONSTITUTION according to the peoples verdict. But without admitting the target of "SOCIALIST INDIA" with the concept of "MARXIAN IDEOLOGY" will not be capable to defend "HINDUTHWA". Without such target attending the GE of 2024 means only complete surrendering before "HINDU FUNDAMENTALISTS" and rejecting entire amenities enjoyed after Independence through democracy in India including "RESERVATION" benefits availed by "DALIT" and others through "INDIAN CONSTITUTION" because HINDU FUNDAMENTALISTS will declare India as "HINDU RASHTRA" and INlDIA will be 2000 years back in history.

/

Some "fools" suggesting to make coalition with "INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS" to defend "HINDUTHWA" is only cheating tactics as had happened in the GE of 2019, as INC wants only "HINDU RASHTRA" and anybody winning will be captured by BJP. Those "FOOLS" actually not "FOOLS", but they keeping their "BRAHMIN TACTICS" for everlasting "BRAHMIN" supremacy in India for ever. But through the history of 100 years, "MARXIAN" IDEOLOGY will be capable to defend "BRAHMIN SUPREMACY" and with SOCIALISM, the ideology MARXSISM will throw away BJP from India. Without understanding MARXSISM, nobody can convince its power, and if they convinced it, they will never make coalition with "CLASS ENEMIES" or promote CLASS ENEMIES, BOURGEOISE AND LAND LORDS OF INDIA. Only in RUSSIA, Lenin had convinced and the result was SOVIET UNION, THE VICTORY In 2ND WORLD WAR. PRESENT STAGE OF RUSSIA IS NOT THE FAULT OF MARXSISM, ONLY THOSE HANDLED IT, LIKE INDIA.

//04 01 2023//.