532. INEFFECTUAL "PARTY CLASSES" OF COMMUNIST MOVEMENTS OF INDIA, SINCE 1950s.
//
As in "DEMOCRACY", ACTUAL POLITICAL POWERS TRASFERRED FROM MONARCHY (KINGDOM) TO PEOPLES, COMMUNIST MOVEMENTS CAN'T NEGLECT OR EVADE FROM DEMOCRACY, AS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO RESTORE MONARCHY.
//
Since 1950s, when it was decided to abandon "socialism" as an "exploitation-free social system" and to promote capitalism in the sense of promoting exploitation, the very nature of the party classes that had been operating until then changed completely. As seen in a "movie", part of a movie showing a part of a party class during the period when the Communist Party was banned says "It is not labor; it is the "manpower" of the worker that is exploited". To establish that, Karl Marx divides the worker's "labour power" into units of hours. Marx establishes that what is paid to the worker as "wages" is actually the price of labor power. Dividing a working day into two parts, Marx established that in the first half of the laborer's "wages" he would do the work, and in the second half the capitalist would exploit the worker.
//
As a Party member who was obliged to attend party classes, I had also attended a party class held a few months ago. I did not make any comment that would cause trouble to a Comrade who runs the party class and works at a high level in the party. They also take classes based on the party classes they got. The content of the work " Das Capital" created by Karl Marx to demonstrate how every worker is subject to the exploitation of labor power, the Comrade took "class" as one should give class to promote exploitation. He also said the word "exploitation" once fluently. But without presenting "production value", he had naratted about "use value" and "market value". Nobody can present about "SURPLUS VALUE", without discussing about "production value". Actually only cheating poor comrades by giving "PARTY CLASSES" through hiding actual exploitation suffering working class and no purposes will be served by giving such classes. The method of "PARTY CLASSES" giving to those comrades joining the party after 1950s, and the result is the present party.
//
In a post prepared in English about "surplus value theory", only one comrade from Bengal commented that there is no such thing as "production value" and it is embedded in marketing value. Then I realized that what is being taught in the party class in Kerala is the same as what is being taught all over India. No product can be sold without production. What Marx tries to find is the value from which the "surplus" comes. That is what is being exploited. That is the meaning of the position that there are no permanent enemies. The point is that it is not accepted that what exists is the rule of the exploiting class. That is the meaning of the stand that the Bengal comrades will continue in alliance with the Indian National Congress. Then there is no need for Marxism.
//
The beginning of my entry into communist politics was by attending a meeting of the AIYF. The early communist leader Com. Vazhithala Bhaskaran who spoke at that meeting (Thodupuzha) spoke about socialism and capitalism. Capitalism is based solely on profit. A capitalist will not spend money where there is no profit. Socialism is based on human goodness. Agriculture, Education and health are sectors where profit should not be made but the society cannot avoid these as inevitable parts of living. Only in socialism, these sectors can be made feasible conditions to afford everybody. This is why I firmly stand on the side of socialism. But later it is known that the Communist Party of India is only standing for capitalism. Who is at fault here? An early communist leader who preached for socialism? Or the communist leadership who were never ready to accept socialism? Upto 1950s, party organisation was only for a socialist society and then peoples of the society in total came forward for a better social system and when the target changed, COMMUNIST MOVEMENT became in stagnation. Only when the target upto 1950s restored, which only MARXSISM admits Indian COMMUNIST MOVEMENTS can fulfil the liabilities vested as per MARXIAN IDEOLOGY. That the aim of the communist parties CPI and CPI(M) when they were one in the 1950s, should be to accept Socialist India and move forward which is the necessity of the present era. There are only one democracy that the social system came into existence over thown MONARCHY and the CITIZENS became the ruling force. When convincing the CITIZENS about the Justice of SOCIALISM, they will vote for it and before 1947, it was too tough. Now the CONSTITUTION also for socialism, which were unimaginable before 1950s. The power of money should be replaced with the power of actual working class, and democracy must become the rule of the people. That will happen only when socialism is implemented.
//
Anyone who could attend one of the Party classes held for an hour at a time when the Communist Party was banned would be a "Communist" for life. But when all favorable conditions exist for the Party to work, it turns out that even if get the "Party" class for the rest of life, will not become a true Communist. Certainly it proves that nobody haven't any objection while a COMMUNIST PARTY promoting capitalism and exploiters for nearing one CENTURY.
//
Party State Secretary COM. MV Govindan himself declared that "there are no permanent class enemies" and "contradictory materialism does not apply to India" and the party in each state of India is "one unit; as units we will face the general elections in India in 2024" only effect of present day party classes in India and reason for present state of party in India. (It means that they do not understand the Indian Constitution and the federal system of India and that India is a country.) Whether India is ruled by BJP or Congress; the position that the Indian people should live anyway. What that comrade said is the result of the party classes that have been obtained since the 1950s. The Party General Secretary itself says that only the Indian National Congress can save India and the Central Committee and the Polit Bureau accept it wholeheartedly. The goal is not an exploitative social system. It is encouraging exploitation. Only those who have received the necessary party classes for 73 years since the 1950s will accept such positions. A party leadership that has no problem with the dissolution of the party in each state.
//
The next class topic is "Marxist Philosophy".
Presenting MATERIALISM AND DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM as only "DARSAN" OR "VISION" and thus only spoiling the subject. In "DARSAN", THERE ARE NO "ACTION" but only "CALL" or just advice just like "MY EXPERIMENTS WITH TRUTH" of Gandhiji. Marxsism is not darsan or advice, but to protect the working class and poor peoples from the exploitation of bourgeoise; and for that; the economic supermacy should have curtailed and there are no choice. Taking class is a very important Party Comrade. He also performed the task. In just half an hour, that comrade said all 7 points on the topic of "Marxist Philosophy of Materialism and Contradictory Materialism". But he did not explained even a single point among 7. I can't accuse him any fault as the method is following throughout India and nobody even a single to clarify the points.
Actually MATERIALISM AND DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM is the scientific approach of MARXSISM to everything and without convincing the peoples, we cannot establish the scientism of MARXSISM. One of the most important example is breating of everybody as "IN AND OUT" are opposits and nobody can split them and eventhough they are not admitting MARXSISM, they cannot evade the actual fact. When saying as "theory" as "Anything contains a contradiction; Everything is interconnected and independent. There is unity between opposites; There is also a strike". But when taking classess to Party Comrades; the points should have clarified, otherwise only wasting time of everybody.
//
"Contradictory materialism" means that there is unity and struggle between opposites. "Contradictory materialism" is just a Marxist, materialist way of examining anything, and even the breathing of anyone is an example of this. In is the opposite of out. Another example is the beginning and end of the esophagus. Because no one can avoid one of them. In mathematics, addition, subtraction, multiplication and division are part of it. Examples of directions are east, west, north and south. If a person standing in the east walks west, he will keep moving west. East will move forward accordingly.The same thing happens if you walk straight back from west to east. This applies to both the south and the north. But only North Pole is in the North and South Pole is in the South. Those are just physical facts. Their relevance lies in confronting the spiritualistic senselessness that the physical universe is all illusion (Jagat mithya). These are facts, whether one accepts Marxism or not.
//
During the period, when I was a worker of CPI, I had occasions to participate the classes of Com.K Damoldaran. In one of the class, he had said that "each and every laws which are existing now were introduced by bourgeoise and elite group of the society only for protecting their interests". In olden days, "slaves" had no right to acquire land for their use. And also in "MANUSMRUTHI" "SHUDRAS" have no right to earn wealth. The followers of modern working class also sufferings its effect in almost field. But "K Damodaran" or EMS had also not convinced the meaning what they had used, otherwise they wouldn't allow to admit the policy as postpone socialism and to promote capitaqlism. And the coalition which follows even now with the Indian National Congress also shows their ignorance about the subject, even though they had taught the party comrades.
//
One of the most important findings of Karl Marx, and Lenin also stressing in his almost all books which I had presented in my book (in Malayalam) in 2005, "WHY SOCIALISM IS NOT ESTABLISHING IN INDIA" with the criticisms about the Party Programme was "IT IS THE BASIC UNDERSTANDINGS OF KARL MARX THAT "ONLY ECONOMICAL BASE STRUCTURE OF THE COUNTRY WILL DECIDE ITS POLITICAL AND CULTURAL UPPER STRUCTURE". (A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy
Book by Karl Marx) IT MEANS IN CAPITALISM; ONLY BOURGEOIS WILL DECIDE WHO MUST BE THEIR RULERS AND THEY WILL NOT ADMIT A COMMUNIST PARTY TO RULE THEM AND TO DECIDE THEIR DEALINGS. THE EXPERIENCE SINCE 1950s IN INDIA; WE CAN ADMIT THIS AND THE GROWTH OF THE COMMUNIST MOVEMENT ALSO PROVE IT. With the concept to promote CAPITALISM; IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH PEOPLES DEMOCRACY IN CAPITALISM.
"KARL MARX IS RIGHT".
Party hadn't noticed my words of criticisms, and expelled me from Party membership. Please consider what was CPI(M) during 2005 and now in 2023.
Even now CPIM PB is not ready to examine the basic concept of MARXSISM, that only economic base structure will decide its POLITICAL AND CULTURAL UPPER STRUCTURE, but only stabilizing economic base structure of capitalism. Ignorance, foolishness, and selfishness preventing them to reconsider the PARTY PROGRAMME, even without considering the future of 140 Crores Indians.
//
Without understanding anything what Karl Marx presented in his boooks, his ideology, claiming that we are "MARXSISTS", and accepting the name of the party as "COMMUNIST PARTY" while following the way of "PROMOTING CAPITALISM" is only cheating the general public and the working class in total. Giving "Party Classes" for promoting capitalism, in the named of Karl Marx also cheating poor comrades which are only wasting the time of comrades.
//23 05 2023//
