361. WHO ARE "ANTI SOCIALS"?
//
WHY INC/BJP "BOURGEOIS/HINDUTHWA POLITICS" BECOME "ANTI SOCIALS"?
//
While considering the answer of this question, we must consider about what is a "SOCIETY". Salient features of the modern SOCIETY is that it is a consolidation of all kind of human races without the consideration of any kind of caste or religion because everything enjoying by each and everybody are the outcome of humanity in general from its very beginning; we can say that the history of human being is starting from old stone age; and in those days; there were only human beings and in those days, we can imagine that the "earth" was a common factor and not any country which now we are known in various names. Each and every amenities the human being enjoying are the outcome of the predecessors which nobody can split by caste or religion in any way.
//
The basis of socialism is that man is a social being. Social life is possible only through mutual cooperation. It can generally be said that anti-socials are those who destroy the unity of society. Anti-socials are those who make social life impossible. Capitalism, the rule of capitalists, is causing misery to a very large number of people for the selfish goals of a very few. They don't even need to know how the vast majority of the country lives. They see the goal of making money as much greater than humanity. Those who make capitalism their basic principle are anti-social. In India, the Hindu communalists who even assassinated Gandhiji are moving forward by eliminating all democratic methods, making even the Constitution ineffective, and destroying India in every way in the name of governance. The characteristic of socialism is that society can only progress if all sections of the people cooperate fully. It is an indispensable requirement that everyone cooperate with each other. Communism is a sincere mutual cooperation that transcends selfishness. The general principle of communism is that all things in nature belong to all living beings.
//
According to "CAPITALISM", working class must live in perpetual poverty and extreme hunger. The two major bourgeois political parties in India that see this as a political goal are the Indian National Congress and the Hindu communalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The two above-mentioned parties are of the same mind that socialist ideology and red-flag politics should not exist in India for any reason. But the reality is that the Communist Party leadership does not understand this because at present they are also functioning as "ANTI-- SOCIALISTS. Those who think that the rule of Hindu communalism in India is enough do not know what the Indian National Congress aims for and that it is Ram Raj. Their goal is also to drain the blood of the people, including the working class. The people of Kerala must also understand the hard work of the Indian National Congress to eliminate the Left-wing regime in Kerala, which is currently in power in India. In 1957, when the EMS Government in Kerala protected the "right to shelter" for poor agricultural workers, a "liberation struggle" was launched against it. The exploitative nature of the Congress was revealed by using the Central Government to dismiss that Government. No one should expect a single seat from Kerala for the "palms" stained with the blood of those who assassinated Gandhiji. When the BBC shone its torch on the Gujarat massacre, there was the hands of INC also.
//
SOCIALISM is only natural justice.. According to Communist followers; "Communism" is a stage of Society in which everybody will live in full co-operation with each other without any kind of selfishness. Everybody must avail as much as possible according to their necessity; but they will not take into safe custody anything as their own for their future because at the time of "PASSING AWAY" from the world, nobody can carry anything. .So, anybody acting as against the interest of the society can be considered as only "ANTI SOCIALS". So, those who are against the "CONTENTS OF SOCIALISM", can be considered only as "ANTI SOCIALS". Certainly, those who are against SOCIALISM, bourgeois political parties, such as INC, BJP are only within the purview of "ANTI SOCIALS".
//
Unfortunately, the narrow and selfish nature of some "ANTI SOCIALS" making the humanity preventing to move in peace and solidarity and they are making only troubles to go forward and healthy and happy living. BJP POLITICS also come in this way.
//
It is a fact that India is under the ruling of ANTI SOCIALS, (UNDER THE BANNER OF HINDUTHWA) those even killed Mahatma Gandhi, and killing the entire qood qualities of Indian Constitution, as being a SOVEREIGN, SECULAR, DEMOCRATIC & SOCIALIST concepts. Due to the ruling of BJP, the entire assets of the country built on the blood of poor Indians, using the wealth of the country; THE PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS, handing over to CORPORATES, for getting scams, (never get if it is undergoing as PSUS).
//
Actual base of "SANGHAPARIVAR" is foolish stories; but "HINDUTHWA" always trying to give "scientific" concept to such stories. Science" is what can be proven repeatedly. Baseless stories cannot be treated as "SCIENCE". Only utter fools can believe such stories as Lord Ganesha was born when Parvati blew the clay, it immediately fought with Shiva, Shiva cut off the head of Ganesha, and head of an elephant placed there, and Hanuman and Bhima born from the air which contains Nitrogen, hydrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide, etc. Mother of Vyasa, Sathyvathi born from a fish, "Karna" was born from the mighty "SUN" etc. can be placed only in stories. According to Ramayana, Hanuman, a strong supporter of Sri. Ram was the son of "AIR". Actually, we know what is "AIR" which we are breathing. Air, containing with oxygen; hydrogen; carbon dioxide; nitrogen (78.09%) etc. Only fools can believe that AIR can gave birth to anything. And also in Maha Bharatha; Bheema was born also the son of AIR. Why Veda Vyasa declined Brahma, the creater of the world according to Manu, in Manu smruthy? Instead Vyasa erected Vishnu over all other gods. It is too cruel. According to Manu, Brahma came out from a golden egg. Actually Brahma means Brahmana. According to Manu smruthy, Shudras have no right to earn money, because if he earned money (wealth) he will not do slavery duty of other 3 varnas.
//
And also, now we are enjoying the features of science in various field even in the name of INTERNET or all kinds of modern life; everything are inter connected in mathematics; language; medicine - are all invented by our ancestors are one by one. We cannot split them into pieces in the name of caste/religion. So "COMMUNAL" politics are only baseless such as "HINDUTHWA/CHRISTIANITY/ISLAMIC etc. There are only "WORKERS" or "WORKING CLASS" where no caste or religion. Unfortunately; almost human beings are keeping in their mind some unwanted and against the interest of social life, a peculiar type of mental status; which are certainly harmful to them and the society in general.
//
Here, the MARXIAN IDEOLOGY become the source of information. According to Karl Marx, "GOODS FORMATION", (all kinds of commodities) are the outcome of the production of labours in various field and every items are joining together as one by one. For example, electricity is a raw material for all purpose and we cannot imagine even one second time, without electricity. Actually, it is the production of a sector with involvement of lac of employees, including hydro electric production. There, we knew it is including construction of dam also. Like this, now a days, we cannot avoid "internet" even for few minutes, then there will be troubles everywhere. So we cannot avoid any sector which we enjoying in our social life. All sectors are necessitates the involvement of humanity in general, which we cannot split into any kind of caste or religion; because everything are introduced by only human beings and they are belongs to all kind of caste and religion. And we knew that the humanity started its journey from "PREHISTORIC" period and then there were not any kind of caste, religion or "GOD"; only they lived together as only living things. So "the society" is the consolidation of all kind of human beings and nobody can split them in the name of any kind of caste or religion. For example; can a "COVID 19" patient insist, that only the doctor, which he is belongs to should treat him? Even "Amit Sha" can insist, the doctor; nurse; medicines and all his accessories are prepared by only "HINDUS"?
//
The basic tenet of Marxism is that the working worker in all fields has the right to live in dignity. To live includes many aspects of life. It includes adequate housing, adequate education for children, adequate treatment for illness and secure old age. But the fundamental principle of the capitalist system is that no worker deserves a decent life. They find the easiest way to do this is to reduce the wages of the worker to the maximum and eliminate permanent employment. It is ensured by the bourgeois political parties, which regard capitalism as its lifeblood. In India it is the Indian National Congress and the Hindutva Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). For that, the position they take is that the working class political movement based on Marxism should not exist under any circumstances. All over India the reactionary political forces trying to restore the "Rama Rajya" monarchy are of the same mind. They organize the workers with the intention that the working class should not become an organized force based on the philosophy of Marxism. In over all India, they are keeping their maximum unity in this regard.
//
It is mere cheating by the acute-enemies of socialism that "when communism comes, everyone will have no family property. Everyone in society can keep as much as he can use for himself and his family. But no one has the right to deny the society its total claim. One thing that was known a few years ago is that Mukesh Ambani, a businessman in India, has a monthly salary of fifteen crore rupees and he can increase it as much as he wants; and he doesn't do that. Even if he pays five crores of income tax out of fifteen crore rupees, he cannot use the remaining ten crores (one thousand lakh) in any way in a month. There is a natural determination of the maximum that every living thing can use for anything. No one can use more than that. It is anti-social behavior and harming others. Another picture of this is a Dalit youth who was not willing to work for meager wages in Uttar Pradesh, was viciously beaten, his toenails were pulled out and a dog bit him to death. It is up to the Indian working class to decide whether the "Hindutva--Sanatana" regime, which provides opportunities for all this, should continue. Capitalism means that one person can own even a country itself, and not care what happens to others. Capitalism means that one person can own a country and not care what happens to others. As political power has shifted from the old monarchy to individual citizens in democracy, democratic changes are also needed in the economic system also. Capitalism is dominated by super power of money.
//
Here is the social science "MARXISM", insists that all kind of human beings should be considered as a part of SOCIAL LIFE, and everybody must be considered as only a chain of social life. And here is the science of SOCIALISM also; because those who are committed to follow only "CAPITALISM" are against the interest of social life; as CAPITALISM is based only on the exploitation of the society as a whole; and its main features are everything based on selfishness of some wicked interest; without considering what is the after effect suffering to others. But in SOCIALISM it is considering the welfare of the society as a whole, and the production of commodities will be, mainly intending the benefit of the citizens as a whole. In a socialist society, the natural resources of the country will be planned to reach its benefits to all citizens as it is quite natural justice.
//
So, SOCIALISM is only natural justice..According to Communist followers; "Communism" is a stage of Society in which everybody will live in full co-operation with each other without any kind of selfishness. Everybody must avail as much as possible according to their necessity; but they will not take into safe custody anything as their own for their future because at the time of "PASSING AWAY" nobody can carry anything. .So, anybody acting as against the interest of the society can be considered as only "ANTI SOCIALS". So, those who are against the "CONTENTS OF SOCIALISM", can be considered only as "ANTI SOCIALS".
//
EXPLOITATIVE CLASS POLITICS IS TOTAL THREAT AGAINST WOMEN.
//
There is a newspaper article dated October 20, 2025 -- Jose Franklin, the Thiruvananthapuram District General Secretary of the Indian National Congress, had summoned to his office and committed sexual harassment to a woman and she committed suicide. A young housewife committed suicide due to constant harassment by Jose Franklin, who is also the Chairman of the Neyyattinkara Municipality Health Committee. Another fact worth noting is the anti-women approach seen on social media by a Youth Congress MLA named "Rahul Mangkootam". The subject there is how harshly he threatens a young woman to prevent her from having a baby. The basic issue is how anti-social a party's "politics" become. The political challenge facing Kerala is that these are all leaders of a political party that is trying to reach out to the people to govern Kerala. They are fully supported by the bourgeois press are also a threat to the people of Kerala. People must be vigilant to ensure that "democracy" does not fall into the hands of anti-social elements.
//
For the bourgeoisie, politics means doing anything to fulfill their interests. The peculiarity of this is that attacks on women are common. That is also part of the position of all religions. According to Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 9, Clause 31, Krishna tells to Arjuna that although women, Vaishyas, and Shudras are not eligible for "moksha" because they are born in the "sinful womb" (sinful by birth), they will be eligible for "moksha" if they pray to him. The first meaning of this is that they are not worthy of moksha. The stance of all religions is against "femininity". The stance of all religions is against "femininity". In "Afghanistan", where Islamic terror is being rulers, there is no humane consideration for women. They are not allowed to do work; not allowed to get education; their houses should not have windows, etc. These are the conditions there. Such positions are a form of cruelty in the name of the arrangements that nature has made for the female body in the survival of living beings. Although the Indian Constitution guarantees equality between men and women, the Hindutva regime rejects even the Constitution itself.
//
If "SOCIALIST INDIA" is presented before the people as an election target and the people's "mandate" is achieved, then no one will be above the people's verdict. But since the 1950s, the Communist Party of India has been asking the people for votes for capitalist growth. The people are not responsible for that. If it is decided that socialism will not be established through democratic means, the result will be the present Indian democracy, Indian Constitution will be hijacked by "HINDHU TERRORISTS BJP" along with the Communist Politics in India. India has a history of giving the Indian National Congress a four-fifths majority for a socialist India and a CONSTITUTION that recognizes a socialist India.
//
.No one in the COMMUNIST PARTY could understood that the "COMMUNIST PARTY" came in power in Kerala during 1957 only due to the fact a "CONSTITUTION" which admitting democracy and adult franchise in India is existing. All citizens, including the "LAND LORD", BRAHMAN, and the DALITH "AGRICULTURAL WORKER" became equal in political power. Unfortunately, the COMMUNIST LEADERSHIP then decided that they will not implement SOCIALISM through "PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY". Poor grasping power to understand actually what is "DEMOCRACY". Those who say that everything is always subject to change cannot understand any changes that occur in society. No one understood the "revolution" that occurred when political power, which had been exclusively vested in the British Queen before 1947, became vested in every citizen when democracy was implemented. No one understood the equality in democracy where Brahmin, landlord, and agricultural laborer all have one vote. Therefore, the communist parties in India decided - even with democracy, socialist transformation in the country would not be allowed. When peoples giving "mandate" for doing what you want, there are no "higher authority" to prevent you. But you will not seek mandate for "SOCIALIST SOCIETY", but only for "CAPITALISM", the peoples are helpless. That is happening in India since 1950, that COMMUNIST MOVEMENTS wil not seek peoples mandate for SOCIALIST COUNTRY. No one understood that the monarchy would never return to carry out a revolution in the future. Even saying something by Harihara Kurup will not change the Communist Party's stance.
//01 11 2020// .
