572. What is Karl Marx's "LAW OF MOTION"?
.
//
Communist movements in India still going on under what Marx called the "dictatorship of the working class," taking into account the monarchies that were extremely powerful during Karl Marx's time. During the Russian Revolution, there was a dictatorship of the "Tsar Emperor." To maintain the working-class regime, a "dictatorship of the working class" was necessary. But the vanishing of the old Soviet Union itself was part of the changing in world situation. In a democracy, every citizen has political power. Communist movements should also take this into consideration.
//
According to MATERIALISM' the actual fact is "MATERIALS" OR MATERIAL THINGS. (living or non living). But according to spiritualism, "the soul is eternal and true." Spiritualists consider the "mind" of a living person to be the "soul." But when brain death occurs, their "mind" is also dead. (BHAGAVAT GITA, CHAPTER 2).
//
Marxism's position is that everyone should be human. Because basically everyone is human. You can't decide someone's religion based on their blood type. Everyone gets sick the same way. The treatment is the same. But the stance of all communalists is that no one should be human. Humanity exists only in humans. But the position of all religions is that their God is the only God; everything else is pure fraud. This is the position of all religions. Everyone is waiting to kill each other if they get the chance. When democracy came into effect, they couldn't do that because whoever commits a crime must be punished. Religions are not prepared for that either. Religions are not ready for that either. They should be the only ones with the right to kill anyone. That is why communalists are also against democracy. Science is always changing. Science is always experimenting. It will always accept what is better. But communalists are also against science. Because religions hold the position that no one should change what is said in religious texts.
//
"ANYTHING IS THAT, BUT IT IS NOT".
Everything is always changing. An important discovery in MATERIALISM that preceded Karl Marx.(This was pointed out by Sri Budha and also one Greek Philosopher).
One most important point of "MATERIALISM" is that every things are changing in each and every second even though nobody is knowing it. In each day, everybody is changing which making themself something different from previous second which actually beyond their control, but everybody noticing only after some periods are over. "Anything is that; but it is not".
"YOU" are the same person, what was ten years back. But now you are changed physically. When did it happened? But you are the same person what was ten years back; but actually not. Every things are changing in each and every second and nobody can prevent it. Everything is always changing. A baby is always growing. But it is only later that it comes to our attention. It's just that the change that happens then doesn't come to our attention. This is for everyone; applies to all things. One year warranty on items we purchase; or two-year guarantee; after a certain period of time, they become obsolete and sometimes become useless. When did it get old? Those objects become obsolete due to the change that occurs every second. Then it is a fact that one can be convinced that "whatever it is, but it is not.
//
Karl Marx points out that changes is not consciously created by anyone. It happens by itself. Childhood, youth, old age and death will occur as a result of the change in the human body. It is not only in human body, but also happening each and every living thing whatever it is. It is controlled by nature and actually this is the facts behind "GOD", but human GODs also can't do anything by "praying of anybody. Anyone can try for the change as they want. But changes will happen even though like or don't like. No one can stop it. Just try to make the changes positive.
//
Marx points out that the changing happening in each objects making changes the surroundings also which also happening beyond the controls of anybody. It is a fact that his findings were apt since the Paleolithic era of history and the changes to slavery system, feudalism, capitalism and the same will move to socialism through out the world. Marx also pointed out that the changes that happening every second in all material things is also happening in the universe and society also. Although Hindu Communalists took a pro-British stance during the Indian independence movement, the British eventually had to leave India despite a series of massacres including the Jallianwala Bagh by British rule in India. India got independence on August 15, 1947. It didn't happen as they wished. But what was lead to the the outcome of the freedom struggle in India? In 1857, the first war of independence against the English East India Company, which ruled India at that time, was also part of it.
//
Before 1947, the political sovereignty of India was with the British Queen. At that time, there were no citizens in India. The CPI(M) Politburo has not understood the change that has come about in Indian politics after 1947. There is no other way to establish socialism in India other than democracy. No matter how many years we wait, there is no other way. Otherwise, we must declare that the goal of socialism has been abandoned forever. If we kill Indian citizens one by one like the Maoists are doing, there will be no socialism in India.
//
Unfortunately, the Communist leadership in India, which did not understood the vast majority of Karl Marx's ideas, did not understood his "laws of motion" in the slightest. Everyone just needs to pay attention to the changes in their own body to understand it. As we age, our bodies undergo their own changes. No one wants it. Everyone wants to stay young forever. No one likes old age. No one likes death at all. But no one can avoid anything. Similarly, no one can avoid the changes that occur in society. The British did not leave India as they wanted. They had gone, even though they not desired. The Indian National Congress does not have the power it had in the 1950s. It's not something they really like. When the people realized what the Indian National Congress, people decided not to vote for them. When asked what business ventures Indian National Congress President Sonia Gandhi did to become one of the four richest women in the world, no one can answer that it is only corruption. But that's the truth. If the Congress President is like that, then no one else can be left behind.
//
Only the CPI(M) Politburo knows why the party program of a socialist system that accepts "Marxism" has not been accepted as a political goal by the CPI(M) in India. Of course, every Indian citizen has the right to know that. The CPI(M) Politburo also has a moral responsibility to inform. Otherwise, don't ask the people for votes. Any political leadership should show loyalty to the people. May be it's because they don't understand what democracy is. Anyway, that's just ignorance. The political power that was vested in the king during the monarchy changed to the individual citizen when democracy implemented. Now, every citizen has political power. If asked to vote for a socialist country, any citizen would cooperate. The decision of the 24th Party Congress held in 2025 was reported to be that "the party has nowhere said that socialism can be established through bourgeois Parliamentary means." The publication of the Political Resolution shows that they still hold that position. It only means that they have no idea what democracy is. They don't understand the changes happening in the country. CPI(M) P B is not ready to accept the Marxist goal of a "WORKING CLASS GOVERNMENT" ADMITTING PEOPLES DEMOCRACY. If teach peoples politically, they will do what is necessary.
//
Perhaps the CPI(M) Politburo's goal is to repeat the old October Revolution. That is impossible. Because repeating everything, including the First World War, is impossible. Tsarist rule; Lenin, everything must be restored. Not only that, but even the old Soviet Union no longer exists. Everything is always subject to change. People in today's Russia are not voting for the old Soviet Union. People want change. In democracy, "CITIZEN" is the supreme authority and MARXISM can't neglect it. Everyone should have the opportunity to do whatever they want without harming society. That was not allowed in the former Soviet Union. And also, the same very much adversely affected old USSR. When China overtaken the issue and now the same very much helpful in China. Not everyone is equal in intelligence. There will be those who are only capable of doing the work that others suggest, and those who are capable of finding their own work. They should be allowed to do it if it will benefit society. All these are changes that must come from old understandings of the socialist system. Things prove that the CPI(M) Politburo is not prepared to embrace any of them. They are not ready for any change. That is the stubbornness that no change is possible in the party program. They are not ready to accept the law of motion. They are not ready to accept democracy. They want the old armed revolution. That requires monarchy. Everything points out only poor grasping capacity of ideas.
//
The Indian people, who did not know what Hindutva BJP was, voted for the BJP in 2015 out of disgust with the corruption of the Congress. It got a narrow majority in Parliament. In 2019, the BJP got a slightly better majority. But as people became more and more aware of what Hindutva politics is, they stopped voting for the BJP. That is why the BJP lost its majority in Parliament in 2024. Then, using fraudulent means and using those who voted against the BJP, they are creating an artificial majority in Parliament. True democracy is not about artificially increasing the number of members of Parliament without the consent of the majority of the Indian Citizen.
//
The Communist leadership in India, which knows nothing about Marx's laws of motion, economics, materialism, or democracy, is not asking for votes for the goal of a socialist state put forward by Marxism. Votes are being sought for the economic policies adopted in the 1950s for the free growth of capitalist society, while insulting Karl Marx and the Indian people. No matter how convinced they are that peoples will not vote for a Communist party for capitalism, they will not ask for votes for a corruption-free socialist country that accepts the Indian Constitution and democracy.
//
If someone does not understand what is "DEMOCRACY" is not the FAULT of DEMOCRACY. If anyone does not understood the cause for which target Karl Marx devoted his life, Marx is not to be blamed. Without understanding that, Indian Communist leaders had decided to promote capitalist exploitation for a period of 74 years after the 1950s. After the general elections to the Indian Parliament in 2024, the Hindutvas are actually ruling India without the proper majority support of the people. Government in democracy without popular support is a betrayal of the people like those who accept Marxism promote capitalist exploitation. People will be helpless if people of good character do not emerge as candidates in a democracy. Exploiting the helpless condition of the people sometimes rule for some time. If that too is beyond a limit, the people will have to come together to protect democracy. The armed revolutions of the past could not have provided the political powers available to every citizen in democracy.That is what happened in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. Democracy came into existence as a result of long sacrifices of the people. That is what the people of India are moving towards. The Hindutvas are ruling India by completely denying the Indian Constitution, which has come into existence with huge popular support.
//
Unfortunately in India Karl Marx's ideas were not understood and everyone kept saying that everything is subject to change without actually knowing what is it.
/
"REVOLUTION".
What is happening in India is that society will go backwards as time goes on if those who keep saying the word "revolution" cannot understand the movements or changes taking place in the society. If we don't learn from the setbacks to socialism in the old Soviet Union, the tragedy will be for working people all over the world. The inability of those in other countries to grasp the success achieved in the socialist country of China in ensuring the cooperation of the people in the production of socialist goods is simply a defect in the ability to understand things. It is also worth noting that the Chinese Communist Party is able to preserve the uniqueness of the socialist system.
//
The truth is that even in democracy, those who chant "revolution" are ignorant of what is happening around us. Those who say that everything is always subject to change are not even aware of the changes in their own bodies. Those who do not understand the revolution happened in 1947 when the political power of India shifted from the British Queen to individual Indian citizens. The "revolution" in democracy could not understand including the Maoists, when an woman named "Droupadi Murmu" being eligible to hold the extreme position of India, as the Hon. President of India; the revolution happened which demolished the old MONARCHY, the political power vested only in the KING were transferred to ordinary citizen. They cannot understand the mere meaning of democracy is "OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE" AND ITS MEANING IS POLITICAL POWER ONLY VESTED IN PEOPLE. If anybody misusing "democracy", it is not the fault of democracy, but only those misusing and cheating the people, only ANTI SOCIAL BOURGEOIS POLITICAL PARTIES. Certainly PEOPLES can throw away them from power, if anybody else with clean image in politics. Including "MAOISTS", WORKING CLASS can also lead the people, if they are ready. If the Soviet Union had failed to Germany in World War II, Modern Parliamentary democracy also would not even have existed. The reason for that is because the people accepted the philosophy of Marxism and SOCIALISM. .The great Joseph Stalin played a great role in it.. Without him, the Soviet Union would had failed and Germany would have won. If Germany had won, India's independence in 1947 would not have happened. Because Britain was mortally wounded in the German attack.
//
The fact is that those who say that socialism is not possible in "bourgeois parliamentary democracy" do not know what democracy is, what Marxism is, or what SOCIALISM is. They don't know anything. They could not understood the revolution of burning "Manusmriti" by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar on 25 December 1927. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar achieved a victory that not even "atomic bomb" could achieve. But those who had to cooperate with it did not understand the revolution in it. The revolution of Mahatma Ayyankali's "Villuvandi Yatra" in Kerala could not have been done in any other way. That was done against the "FOUR CASTE SYSTEM" and also against "brahmin supermacy". Only MARXISM AND WORKING CLASS MOVEMENT OF INDIA CAN GO FORWARD ALONG WITH THE FIGHT FOR SOCIALISM AND PROTECTING THE RIGHT OF DALITH, ETC. And which will be protecting Indian Constitution as Article 14 insisting equality of everybody.
//
But as Comrade Paloli Mohammadkutty did when he was a DYFI activist, the atrocities committed by "self-proclaimed upper castes" against the backward classes must be resisted. (When a poor man entered the tea shop was beaten up by the "elite gentlemen" and Com.Paloli Mohammed kutty treated them suitably). The DYFI behavior of anyone with red blood has been lost somewhere all over India. We must handle the perversity of thinking that they have the right to stop the poor from bathing in the Ganges. Those who do not accept the humanism of Marxism cannot guarantee the equality of citizens under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. It is a revolution for social change. Those who do not understand it, chanting "revolution" is just a vain lamentation. When nature allows any living thing to eat what it needs, when it is prevented by hooliganism, when it becomes political, we must be ready to protect the fundamental rights provided by the Indian Constitution, it should be considered a revolution. DYFI can become its defenders by accepting the Constitution when it is flatly lying that the Sangh Parivar accepts the Constitution of India. It is also a tribute to Dr. BR Ambedkar. Now there are being only witnesses everywhere. Narendra Modi, who does not accept a single word of the Indian Constitution, is the biggest liar in the world when he says that he accepts the Indian Constitution.
//
No one had understood what a social system, SOCIALISM, is that is free from exploitation. Then it realized that the revolution is only an armed revolution. Before 1947 India's "Political Ruler" was the British Queen but no one knew what every citizen of India became vested with political power when independence was achieved and democracy implemented. Even though no MONARCHY in India, everyone as MARXIST TEACHER taught others that there are feudalism existed. No one understood the peculiarity of the fact that the Communist Party not allowed to operate before 1947 changed as completely legal. We can talk about Marxism and socialism from anywhere; it is not understood that it is part of political freedom.
//
The conflict of interests of slave and slave owner was not understood. They did not understand that the modern bourgeoisie are the descendants of the slave owner who exploited the slave and gained maximum wealth and that promoting capitalism means promoting the old slave owners and then the class struggle is completely neglected. It also fails to realize that the promotion of capitalism, seventy four long years after the 1950s, is a complete denial of the theory of class struggle, and in effect a complete denial of Marxism. The fact is that it does not even acknowledge that it is the rule of the exploitative class that exists. That is the meaning of the position that there are no permanent class enemies. That is the basis of the current position that only the Indian National Congress can save India. Nor is it convinced that socialism – a non-exploitative social system – or Marxism has no necessitates.
//
Frederich Engels was the person who helped Marx a lot in the formation of "Marxism". But Marxism is named after Karl Marx. When Engels was once asked about it, he said: "Its only just and justice that the ideas "MARXISM" should be in the name of Karl Marx and even the actual contents of COMMUNIST MANIFESTO was Marx' alone. He was not a man, but genius in its true spirit"...."Marx saw too far and too high". what does that mean? Karl Marx saw the entire history of the human race. "Class struggle" means that class struggle also started with the emergence of slavery and private property. It means that class struggle also started with the advent of slavery and private property. The interests of the slave and the slave owner are different. There are two lives of the oppressor and the oppressed. Both are human. But the "OPPRESSOR" can't see other are human beings. But the oppressors are financially powerful. The "governing structure" and the entire laws created by the "oppressor" with the intention of safeguarding their interest; and it is for them. The "oppressed" are everywhere in the world. Karl Marx was able to understand their problems. That's what Engels said -- that Karl Marx saw too high and too far.
//
When India got independence in 1947 and the country became in democracy, each citizen became having the political freedom also, which was only with BRITISH QUEEN, before 1947. The communist leaders of India did not understood the changes that happened in India and according to them, they were waiting to a chance for repeating October Revolution again in India without realizing the fact that only according to the situations prevailing in a country, a COMMUNIST PARTY CAN WORK. When India was freed from British rule, the political sovereignty of India became vested in every citizen of India. As a result of not understanding what democracy is, the working class did not understand who they should fight against. They were ignorant the fact that "democracy" enabling a citizen to decide the future of the country also and also giving liberty to teach anybody the ideology MARXISM which were impossible during MONARCHY time.
//
No one can be blamed for not fully understanding Marxism. But because they did not understood Marx's law of motion, the Indian people had to travel back in history for a century to even accept the position that capitalism can be promoted in India. That is what has led to Hindutva extremists ruling India now. Neither Lenin in the old Soviet Union nor Mao Ze dong in China had such a breakdown.
//
As political sovereignty has become vested in every citizen, there is a need to make them aware of the prevailing exploitative class rule. Instead, decided to promote Indian capitalism even though there was no hint of promoting capitalism anywhere in the scripts of Marx. When the changes in society are not understood by those who admit Marxism, the future of the country will be at stake. What is happening in India is that the working class leadership placed all their faith in Indian National Congress, which ruled India since 1947 and also hardly trying to wipe out MARXIAN IDEOLOGY AND WORKING CLASS POLITICS FROM INDIAN SOIL. Everyone saying that everything is subject to change without understanding any of Karl Marx's ideas about the "LAW OF MOTION". No one noticed anything about the end of the British rule, the end of the monarchy, the introduction of democracy and the adoption of socialism even in the CONSTITUTION itself. Since everything is subject to change, the Communist leadership in India decided that Marxism should become to promotion of capitalism. Those who said that everything is always subject to change also did not understood the point of saying so and argued that "MARXISM" is not "DOGMATISM".
//
The decision of Indian Parliament as India will be a "SOCIALIST COUNTRY" as a result of the adoption of the socialist system by the people of the world, which has been approved by the Indian people with a four-fifths majority in Parliament and has become a part of the Indian Constitution itself. But the Indian National Congress, which is the political leadership of the Indian exploiters, could not adopt a scientific approach or change the entire country to a socialist system except under the leadership of the real working classes. As a political task, the Indian working class will be fulfilled only if the communist movements take over the governance of India to carry out the decision of the Indian people and protect the Indian Constitution and democracy from Hindutva extremists. The uncertainty in this regard is only due to the inability to grasp the actual contents of MARXISM.
//
The basic principle of democracy and social justice in socialism is that all the people are entitled to enjoy the wealth of a country. But capitalism, rooted in selfishness and exploitation, does not accept this. Socialism also embodies the concept of "Lokha Samasta:Sukhino Bhavantu". But "Hinduism" is completely against socialism because they are only representing the ELITE WING of India. But "Freedom of speech" or "freedom of media" in democracy provides opportunity to bring the justice and science of Marxism to the people. It was not allowed in the monarchy. The justice of Marxism is that all people, including the toiling workers and the poor peasants, have the right to live in dignity. Its science is that the entire wealth of the country is generated by their labor. The capitalist system does not accept that. The rich classes must continue their continued exploitation forever. In a democracy, every citizen has political freedom, so the people can change the country's economy to a socialist system by registering their opinions as their votes. It is enough that the communist movements in India discharge their political duty.
//12 03 2024//
