In the 2019 giant "floods", the vast majority of houses in the Kuttanad region of Kerala were submerged in mud, leaving wells and septic tanks unrecognizable. Activists from the Communist Party and youth organizations like DYFI arrived there from Alappuzha district and nearby areas and made entire houses habitable in two weeks, without expecting anything in return. They were more than sixty thousand workers. Once, Comrade Pinarayi Vijayan said to "PRESS" that "You don't know anything about our party". That Comrade told a truth, but it's not easy to understand. Comrades who stand under the red flag, ready to make any sacrifice for social change without expecting anything in return. What based on their actions are only the sense of humanity of the philosophy of "MARXISM". They are those who deliver "pothichor" (food) to Government hospitals where the poor patients and their parents, who donate blood to anyone, and who come to anyone's aid. There will be no fraudsters among them, only honest ones. They will be there to save those who lost everything in the flood in "Wayanad" of Kerala where hundreds lost their everything. Those peoples coming under "RED FLAG" are generally known as "LEFT POLITICS" followers.
//
But
it is also essential to know what the "Right wing" is. Nowhere in the
world should the working class live with dignity; for that, pay them as
little as possible; Their stance is to deliberately make laws against
them; to extend working hours as much as possible, etc. Their stance
that the country should be as poor as possible; that the country's
wealth should be entirely in the hands of capitalists; and that everyone
should cooperate with corruption are common characteristics of
right-wing politics. They are called pro-capitalist or right-wing
politicians.
//
The Communist movement in Kerala grew alongside socialist ideas. Therefore, as part of the socialist system, it is necessary to provide maximum housing to the homeless and to prepare Government hospitals to provide maximum free medical care. It also tries to make education accessible to as many people as possible. And the Government is concerned about controlling the prices of essential goods and ensuring that those who take up employment receive with decent wages. Honest work is part of Working class culture. If people are taught that only the Left can achieve these things for the people of India, then the "Left will rule India". Moreover, for politics to be honest, there must be a left-wing Government in India inevitable.
//
But the "Communist" party leadership in the states of India, except Kerala, has never even heard of such things. For them, "Marxism" means armed revolution and the "dictatorship of the working class." And also "democracy" also a horrible word. And the "EMS's stance that "socialism is impossible through parliamentary means." No one in India is willing to consider "SOCIALISM IN INDIAN MODEL" But they seen a "Harihara Kurup" with extreme enmity.. Because no matter what Harihara Kurup says, no one will consider it as Marxism. India will continue to be a Hindutva terrorist state. The basic party education received by CPI(M) and CPI party workers in India is that they should not even mention the word "SOCIALISM" under any circumstances because that will insult bourgeois political parties and CAPITALISM in total. "Party Congresses" will continue to be held every three years, as a matter of routine process.
//
The stand CPI(M) and CPI is that India need only the expulsion of BJP regime to be demolished. It does not accept that what exists is the rule of the exploiting class, There are no class enemies. There is no question of class struggle. It is not accepted that the exploiting class, including the Congress and the BJP, has a position that working class politics should not exist in India. They are the same everywhere in India on that issue. That has been the position for the last 75 years since 1950. No matter how much the Communist movement collapses, there is no intention of changing that position.
//
None of the "Communist leaders" in India in the 1950s understood Marx's discovery that all written history is the "history of class struggles." Otherwise, they would not have taken the position that Indian capitalism should be "PROMOTED". Now they are on the position that they will never change. Marx discovered this from the slave struggle led by "Spartacus" in ancient Rome. The forces of evil that always bury the good were economic forces. They poisoned Socrates, who tried to guide society to the right path. Jesus Christ, who stood against the rich man and the hypocritical priests, was crucified. One of Jesus' prayers was that the comforts of heaven should be on earth as well. Jesus always stood along with poor peoples and workers. And that everyone should have the purity of a child's heart. Even there, it was the wealthy of that time who took a stand against Jesus. The entire Old Testament of the Bible is the history of the liberation of the Israelites from the slavery of Pharaoh. Those who do not know that will not be convinced by Marx's words. The entire history of Europe was a time of slavery. The black people of Africa were enslaved and sold around the world, and today's America was created through brutality on slaves.
//
In India, it was in the form of Brahmin rule. The Aryan rule was Brahmin rule. They were able to keep all the kings under them. Emperor Ashoka of the Mauryan Empire had embraced Buddhism, but Brahmin rule eliminated it in India. After the massacre of about 5,000 Buddhist monks, the remaining ones fled to countries such as Nepal and China. "Brahminism", which directly took over the "monopoly" of education, made it its greatest weapon. Brahminism considered women, Vaishyas, Shudras as born sinners, and those who did not belong to any of these, even as human beings.
//
Brahminism did not give any humane consideration to those outside the four-caste system. The kings enforced the idea that only Brahmins, kings, and temples were entitled to own land, leading to extreme cruelty against Dalits and backward classes. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, who became the architect of the Indian Constitution, was one who experienced the horrors of it all. However, the then communist leadership adopted the stance of promoting Indian capitalism in the 1950s, without considering the existence of exploitation or class contradictions in India.. The stance of the Communist Parties in India is that even after 76 long years, there is no exploitation, no exploiting classes, and no class enemies for the Indian working class in India.
//
The "Left" in Kerala is firmly committed to "development" across the country, on the basis that the entire Indian working class has "no class enemies". The development of the COUNTRY or the resolution of any problems of the working people can never be the "politics" of the exploiting classes. An example of this is the Indian National Congress, which ruled India for more than 65 years. They will accept even "democracy" if it serves the interests of the exploiting class. Otherwise, they will subvert democracy as well. The class of nobles and priests who ruled over the people under the king during the monarchy wanted to retain their old political power even after the monarchy was abolished. There were about 500 princely states in India during the post- independence era. Although the rule has ceased, the old "kings" are still dominant. The leaders of that time are the foundation of the Congress and the BJP. They stood as "Congress" when the Indian National Congress ruled India, and as Hindutva BJP when the Congress lost power. Their only goal is to continue their rule in the old monarchy even in a democracy. They are united in their firm stand that "working class politics should not exist anywhere in India", even if it is seen in the name of BJP or Congress in Kerala. The situation in West Bengal is similar. The exploiting classes in India will not disagree that working-class politics should not exist in India.
//
WHY "COMMUNIST PARTIES" SUPPORTING EACH AND EVERY ASSETS OF THE COUNTRY
WHEN ENTRUSTING BOURGEOIS PARTIES LIKE BJP, INC ETC TO CAPITALISTS AND CORPORATES?
//
If the country is rich, the wealth of the country can be utilized for the welfare of the people in general including WORKING CLASS AND POOR PEOPLES. That is the method adopted in SOCIALIST COUNTRIES like CHINA etc. But according to bourgeois political parties like BJP, Indian National Congress etc. the COUNTRY should be very poor and the entire assets of the country should be entrusted to rich CAPITALISTS and CORPORATES and the country should be governed by MONEY in every aspects. That will help BOURGEOIS PARTIES to conduct corruption and scam in each and every sector in social life. But unfortunately in India "COMMUNIST PARTIES" like CPI(M), CPI also in the same way of BOURGEOIS PARTIES. So they whole heartedly supporting privatization of PUBLIC ASSETS for the last so many years. They will not say even a little word against PRIVATIZATION of public assets even in ELECTIONS to blame BOURGEOIS PARTIES. Perhaps they are ignorant that the fact such things can be used as most powerful weapons even to demolish CAPITALIST SYSTEM of the country itself.
//
Along with that, Communist parties are also in favor of a complete ban on permanent postings including even in MILITARY. They are neglecting the fact that all postings in PUBLIC SECTOR INSTITUTIONS INCLUDING BANKS. The issue is also not how the lives of the millions of young people who will lose their jobs will be. The future of the backward classes, including the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, who will lose their reservation benefits, is also not an issue. The Sangh Parivar's stance of completely abolishing labor laws will not be made an election issue. It is also not clear that the economic base is the real foundation of the country. They should all remain the property of the capitalists.If the Communist parties do not have such positions, they should explain their tragedies to the people during the elections and tell them not to vote for those positions. Such a position will never be accepted by the Communist parties in India as a whole.
//
NOBODY AND NO WHERE SAYING WHAT SHOULD BE SOCIALISM IN EACH COUNTRY. IN INDIA, WE CAN ADOPT A NEW METHOD AS INSISTED IN INDIAN CONSTITUTION. BUT "MONEY" SHOULD NOT BE THE FACT DECDING AS BASE AS IN CAPITALISM, BUT THE PEOPLES, AS IN DEMOCRACY EVERY CITIZEN
HOLDING EQUAL POLITICAL RIGHT.
//
AS INDIA IS A SECULAR COUNTRY, ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTION, A "HINDHU RASHTRA" IS IMPOSSIBLE. BUT BJP IS TOTALLY AGAINST EACH AND EVERY ITEMS OF CONSTITUTION, IT CAN BE EASILY WIPED OFF FROM INDIAN SOIL BY INDIAN CITIZENS THROUGH THEIR SINGLE "VOTE" IF IT IS FOR SOCIALIST INDIA.
//
BJP DEADLY AGAINST DEMOCRACY. SO IT HAVE NO RIGHT TO EXIST AT PRESENT. IT CANNOT ADMIT FREEDOM OF OPINION, THE BASE OF DEMOCRACY. BJP SHOULD GO TO HISTORY. Even the word "HINDHU" is only a POLITICAL WEAPON OF BJP just like "RAM" as actual "RAM" not yet came out from "RAMAYANA". Actually there are no word as HINDHU in the dirty "FOUR CASTE" system. In fact, BJP politics only for BRAHMINS of INDIA.
//
What
the "Communist" leadership of the 1950s failed to understand was not
only Marx's fundamental discovery that written history is the history of
class struggles. The Constitution of India is a federal system.
According to the Constitution of India, the sovereignty of India is
vested in the Parliament of India and the Central Government. The
"PROGRAM" of a Communist Party in a country should be to rule that
COUNTRY, , not to rule any state. Because there was no such goal, no
significant changes could be brought about in the state of Bengal
despite ruling continuously for 34 years. That was impossible.
Because without political sovereignty and economic sovereignty, no
fundamental changes are possible in any country. Without the consent
of Central Government, nothing can be done in any "State" Government
in India. But if the target of the Party to govern was India, then
India would be able to take decisions that apply to the whole country.