612. BASICALLY, MARXISM IS ECONOMIC SCIENCE.
//
It is a fact that the economic base determines the political and cultural superstructure simply means that as long as the Ambanis and Adanis are promoted, they (their money) will rule the country. It doesn't matter to them whether it's Congress or BJP. As long as the Communist leadership in India continues to be Anti-socialist, Anti Marxist stand, India will keep going back to the old days of Manusmriti.
//
In
the "Communist Manifesto", Marx says that the bourgeoisie has placed
"money" above everything else. It means that human relations were
considered above all as "profit". That is why Marx gave the title
"Capital" to the work based on his economic researches. He also takes
into account the changes that occur in people as money increases. He
points out the economic and spiritual exploitation experienced by the
working class, or the working people as a whole. Unfortunately, none of
that comes up in K. Damodaran's "Marxist Studies". That is why the goal
of an exploitation-free social system in India has been missing since
the 1950s. They decided to promote the existing Brahmin rule, including
the existing one. Now, the CPI(M) has accepted all of them. That is the
reason for the stance that the goal of a socialist system in India would
not be accepted even if it were part of the Indian Constitution. It was
also the reason for the split of the communist movement into two
parties, the CPI and the CPI(M) in 1964. But no one understood that
after EMS. What became "people's democracy" and "national democracy" was
not just in name. Remember Lenin's words that if socialism is not the
goal, the result will be the burying of Marxist ideology. In India, it became a fact and the Communist movements working for the only :FREE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALIST SYSTEM for ever. And the "COMMUNIST LEADERS" found a suitable solution, SOCIALISM IS IMPOSSIBLE THROUGH PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY. The entire target of Marx - an exploitation free social system, SOCIALISM have been buried in the above subject.
//
The
leaders of the "COMMUNIST MOVEMENTS" didn't admitted that the
exploitation through economic and "athmeeya" (soul) are part of
CAPITALIST mode of exploitation otherwise purposely hidden from working
class. That
is the reason for the perception that there are "NO CLASS ENEMIES".
That is why the CPI(M) and CPI parties have taken the stance that the
BJP rule need only end and Congress rule should come to power in
India. There is not the choice of SOCIALISM
in India. That has been the position since the 1950s. What is happening
now is denying the relevance of Marxism. Saying a few words by one
Harihara kurup is unlikely to change that. (That is the part of "We
should proud of our ARSHA BHARATA CULTURE). Therefore, a social system free from exploitation was not part
of working class politics in India. The exploiting classes have used
the weakness that if they were taught that everything is "God's will",
the slave or the poor would not seek to escape. It was also decided that
the materialist and contradiction-based materialist arguments, which
are the scientific approach of Marxism to be applied against it, are
"not applicable" to India.
//
It was because it had been realized that since the days of private property and slavery, the concentration of wealth had oppressed all working people in the form of "GOVERNMENT". In the "Communist Manifesto" prepared by Karl Marx and Engels in 1848 itself stipulates that the "state", which is the "instrument of oppression" of the exploiting classes, must be led by the working class. But even after more than a hundred years since its inception, the Communist leadership in India has not realized its necessity. They are not ready to accept such a target and they will never allow to place candidates to contest elections as such steps will hurt Indian CAPITALISM.
//
Marx also examines periods in terms of economic systems. Even the British Empire, on which the Sun never sets, does not come into Marx's consideration. During the slave era, the Government was for the slave owners. They controlled the kings. During the feudal era, the kings were controlled by the lords, who were the economic power. In a capitalist system, the Government is controlled by capitalists or corporations. The Government works only for their interests. Communist parties are giving full support to the Hindutva regime, Narendra Modi and the Corporates for the "independent growth of capitalist society" as if it were a very revolutionary move. They, on the other hand, are making every effort to maximize capitalist exploitation by completely abolishing labor laws, maximizing working hours, and completely eliminating permanent employment. The wealth of the country should be entirely in the hands of Corporates. In reality, the concentration of wealth is what completely controls society. That is the merit of "CAPITALISM" as "MONEY" controlling everything. It is the money of ordinary people that Corporates make theirs through the stock markets and use as a means to govern them. A crash in the stock market never affects Corporates; Only in SOCIALISM, it will change as humanity; love each other will be overall controlling.
//
The Communist Parties in India are steadfast in their stance on the free growth of Indian capitalism. There, Marx's conclusions that the "STATE" should be led by the working class are being skillfully subverted, as the concentration of wealth in the form of the "STATE" oppresses and exploits the poor. In a democracy, the capitalist and the worker have only one vote. There are lakhs of workers under Ambani. It goes without saying what will happen if Ambani's one vote and the votes of lakhs of workers clash. The "Communist leadership" found an easy way to sabotage it: the stance of not contesting elections. Communist parties will not contest across India, including Uttar Pradesh, which has the largest number of parliamentary constituencies in India with flimsy reasons. Otherwise, if they contest, they will be asking for votes for the same economic positions as the Hindutva BJP and the Indian National Congress for implementing GLOBALIZATION. We will not ask for votes for a socialist system, because the only goal is the growth of capitalist society. There will be no change in that. Because it has been going on for the past 75 years since 1950. If it is to change, those who were in the 1950s have to come back. Harihara Kurup.
//
Among
the Communist leaders of the past, Comrade EMS was the only one who
understood the "CLASS STRUCTURE" of the Indian National Congress.
That was the conclusion reached in 1964 that the Congress was a
political party representing the big bourgeois land Lords. of India. It
also includes the fact that all written history is the history of class
struggles. The proof that it was right is the reason why all the
people who loved the Communist Party aligned themselves with the CPI(M)
after the split in 1964. But except EMS, none of the CPI(M) leaders
understood the contents of "class structure". That is why they are now
preparing to hand over Indian politics entirely to the Congress. What
EMS meant by "capitalism" was that there should be private sector
cooperation in socialist commodity production, as China has now adopted.
Capitalism is the total politics of the exploiting classes. It
includes the Congress, the BJP, and all other communal-petty bourgeois
parties. In India, it includes all the anti-communist-socialist parties.
//
Nothing will be decided at "Party Congresses." The things that need to be decided are decided before the "draft political resolution" is prepared by some external forces and in PARTY CONGRESSES being implementing media. The base is implementing GLOBALIZATION. Decision of the Party Congress can be confirmed while deciding who should be the "President" there. Before this, Manik Sarkkar" was the one who became the president. It can be decided there. All hope lies in the Indian National Congress. If INC cannot get in power in India, there is no objections in continuing BJP for ever, as the main target if FREE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM. When giving a NON FACIST CERTIFICATE, that was in mind. The GOVERNMENT OF INDIA should not become under the ruling of Indian Working Class in DEMOCRATIC manner for a SOCIALIST COUNTRY. In India, only the words of K DAMODARAN and EMS relevant even though those are deadly against MARXISM and working class in total. My hope has not been disappointed until the last CPI(M) 24th Party Congress. In the future, things may change due to his absence.
//
In
a capitalist system, the nation must be poor and the capitalists must
be rich. Only then can the dictatorship of the capitalists or money
prevail anywhere. If the nation is wealthy under socialism, the working
people will benefit from it. The exploiting class is of the same mind to
ensure that this never happens. If we take the position that the "Government" should belong to the working class for a socialist system and appeal to the working class and the people for votes, the people will give their full support. But "COMMUNIST" leaders never take that stance and continue to accept defeat by declaring support for exploitative class politics and asking for votes for capitalist growth. It is said no one in India has even seen the words from Lenin's "What should be Done?" that putting aside the goal of socialism will in effect bury Marxist ideology, and that the result will be to downplay the relevance of socialism and strengthen bourgeois ideology. In India, only the words of "EMS relevant for ever; which are burying the WORKING CLASS politics in India.
//
The decision to promote Indian capitalism in 1950s was made due to the fact that the "COMMUNIST" leaders of 1950s had not understood that the base of MARXISM is that the findings of Marx was that the consolidation of wealth on the exploiters were become tool of oppression as "GOVERNMENT"; there would not have the decision of promoting Indian capitalism. It has lasted for so long that now no one even knows what real working-class politics is. That is the reason for the firm stance that no matter how viciously class enemies attack in Kerala, there are firm stand is that there "no class enemies". without understanding any of the facts pointed out by Marx, including the fact that all written history is the history of class struggles. No matter what a mere Harihara Kurup says, the Communist leadership in India has no obligation or possibility to accept it. For those who do not understand class conflicts, for those who do not understand that all written history is the history of class struggles, for those who do not understand the horrors of Brahmin rule in India, will not understand who was Dr B R AMBEDKKAR or what is modern parliamentary democracy. If we tell them that the foundation of Marxism is humanity, they won't understand even a little bit. To them, Marxism means only the "dictatorship of the working class". Since that is not possible, they will forever promote Indian capitalism in the name of Karl Marx with the same passion for socialism; with the same party discipline;
//
When admitting SOCIALISM as PARTY PROGRAM, there are only the decision that the "GOVERNMENT" which is the tool of EXPLOITATION OF BOURGEOIS should be with the WORKING CLASS. Then the "CLASS ENEMIES" only can consider as CLASS ENEMIES without any kind of CLASS COLLABORATION. "ELECTIONS" will become part of CLASS STRUGGLE. Only then the ideology MARXISM become in working field. How it is implemented is not the part of ideology. Since 1950s the admitted the method is CORRECTION, AND STRENGTHEN THE BOURGEOIS. Only mental patients can consider such actions as part of MARXISM.
//
After the October Revolution in Russia in 1917, there was a four-year internal counter-revolutionary coup had took place there. During the October Revolution, the Tsar's army, led by the commander-in-chief, Kolchak, was at war with Germany. The first thing Lenin's revolutionary government did after seizing power was to make a compromise with Germany and withdraw from the war.
The "army" that returned after the war, led by Kolchak, began a counter-revolutionary war as "WHITE GUARD" against the RED ARMY of revolutionary Government. Although there was a subversive struggle there for four years, in collaboration with all the imperialist powers, the final victory was on the side of SOCIALISM. The revolutionary government seized farmland owned by the land lords and gave it to the peasants. Measures in favor of the common people and the fact that most of the soldiers in the old Army stood in favor of socialism helped the victory of socialism. But when facing the counter attack, took place there, 25 million people died. Among them were those who supported and those who opposed the revolutionary government. (These are the contents of the work The Story of Building Socialism in the Soviet Union). The vast majority of those who died were poor people, loyal to the old king and subject to the dictates of religious leadership. If they truly understood what socialism was, none of them would be opposed to the revolutionary Government.
//
The
reactionary forces that waged a counter-revolution against socialism in
old Russia for four years are using all their strength to resist
Socialist ideas in India also. Among them there will be the old native
kings, the Brahmin superamacy, all other religions, their money,
beliefs, and landlords etc. also. In India, it is too shame that the
Communist parties themselves have taken the stance of "there are no
class enemies" for the past 75 years, since 1950, and also "for the free
development of capitalist society." The stance of India's "Communist
leadership" in the 1950s was that they either didn't understand that or
didn't need a red flag in India. The Politburo, including Prakash Karat,
decided at the last CPI(M) 24th Party Congress that capitalism alone
would suffice, even though it was certain that the party would be
completely dissolved.
//
In a modern parliamentary democracy, there are all the facilities to teach people what Marxism or SOCIALISM is. But for some reason, the stance of the "Communist" leadership in India is that they will not teach the people what socialism and Marxism are, and that armed revolution is inevitable. Those who take the position that the October Revolution should be repeated do not even know that even the Constitution of India has accepted Socialism.
//
Basically, "Marxism" is economics.
//
It was during the long-standing monarchy that Karl Marx and Engels put forward some ideas about socialism, where everyone would live happily ever after, as an alternative. When ideas that are purely imaginary are put into practice, there are bound to be problems. That's what happened in the former Soviet Union. Basically, everyone is human. Diversity is a law of nature, just like contradictions. Diversity is a law of nature, just as it is in physical structure. Like Karl Marx, there are people in society who have extraordinary thinking skills and who simply cannot understand things no matter how much they are explained. Such people often have extraordinary talents in other areas. They may be in painting or sports, etc. . No matter how much money they have, some people are not interested in earning more. The story of Prince Siddhartha, also known as the Buddha, even included kings. There are many such people. Friedrich Engels, Marx's greatest helper, was one such person. The Com. EMS of Kerala was also one such person. Though he was a Brahmin, Land Lord, became a Communist leader. It is also too difficult for everyone to be the same. The greatness of the modern democratic system is that everyone's cooperation is needed to advance the country's social and economic structure. That too will be possible. The reason it didn't exist in the old Soviet Union is that people there don't vote for the old system anymore. What's relevant there is that everything is always subject to change. That's also a natural law. All these are not irrelevant in the social justice of SOCIALISM because SOCIALISM also the law of nature as nature intended every thing intended to each and every living things.
/
WITHOUT MARXIST IDEOLOGICAL BASE.......
The Communist movement in any country cannot move forward without a clear Marxist ideological foundation. Those who led the Communist movement in India in the 1950s, such as S.A. Dange and K. Damodaran etc. had only vague understandings of the basic principles. They did not have the understanding that what existed was class rule by the exploiting classes or the wealthy classes. Then the problem of a social system free of exploitation did not arise. If there are exploitation, there would be no problem of encouraging it. They had no knowledge of Marxist economics or the economic and spiritual exploitation suffered by the working class. They did not have any objective knowledge of materialism, the scientific basis of Marxism; or materialism based on contradictions. The result is the current state of the hundred-year-old communist movement in India.
//
The basis of class struggle is class antagonism. The basis of class antagonism is the antagonism between the interests of the slave owner and the efforts of the slave to maintain his life. In modern times, the conflict between the interests of the capitalist and the interests of the worker is what drives capitalist commodity production and the survival of the capitalist system. When capitalism is promoted, the theory of class struggle disappears. That is what has been happening in India since the 1950s.
//
The most dangerous situation is the position of "COMMUNIST LEADER" is that "there are no class enemies." The position of the exploiting classes that the working class should not organize as a "CLASS" is too tough to understand to "COMMUNIST LEADERS" as they have no "enmity" to bourgeois and their siblings. It is not convincing why Amit Shah's stance that India should not even have a "red color" anywhere in India is based on that. It is not convincing that the Indian National Congress and Hindutva activists have the same stance on that issue. Those who say that everything is always subject to change do not understand anything. They see the transfer of political power, which used to be vested solely in the king, to individual citizens as a danger. That is the reason for their stance that socialism is not possible through democratic means.
//
Marx pointed out that all "WRITTEN HISTORY" is the history of "CLASS STRUGGLES". What "COMMUNIST LEADERS" in India, including Dange, failed to understand was the loss of a hundred years to the Communist movement in India. In India, "WRITTEN HISTORY" is the history of "CLASS STRUGGLES" was in the form of Brahminism and the four castes. Even after three quarters of a century, it is still not clear that the result is that there are no class enemies and that Marxism completely denies them. That is the meaning of the position that the Hindutva BJP should leave the government of India and the Indian National Congress should come back to power. It is also not understood that the Congress, the BJP and all religious terrorists are fundamentally one. They also fail to understand that the exploiting class's position is that the working class should not be a political force. The future is further lost if the new generation fails to understand that democracy is the transfer of political power from the monarchy to each citizen. The only people who have to suffer there too are the working people. The party leadership, who do not understand what Harihara Kurup is saying, would be asking them to ignore Harihara Kurup's posts on social media. Such people will have no problem with the Communist Party itself disappearing.
//14 07 2025//
