561. INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRES AND SANGHAPARIVAR, ETC. DO NOT ADMITTING DEMOCRACY.
//
Their actual target is "Rama Rajya", which means monarchy. They always think how to overcome real "democracy" because "democracy" means, "of the people", "by the people, for the people".
//
"DRAUPATHI MURMU", a lady, became the "PRESIDENT OF INDIA" is the glory of DEMOCRACY and she hadn't permitted to be inaugurated the new PARLIAMENT BUILDING is the evidence that actually India is ruling by the ideology of "MANUSMRUTI". Means actually BJP is not ready to follow democracy and Indian Constitution.
//
When saying that Indian National Congress and Sanghaparivar not admitting "democracy" we have to understand what is democracy and what is not democracy. Nothing the Left Front doing in Kerala is acceptable to them - because their politics and democracy are none of them. With that, the left-wing government in Kerala should not exist any more. Congress and BJP think do anything for that. Actual fact behind their status is that the "LEFT FRONT" ruling in Kerala is going on with the concept of "MARXIST IDEOLOGY" even though they are very far away from the MARXIST IDEOLOGY, as to follow such ideologies is possible only in a "SOVEREIGN COUNTRY", and Kerala is only a dependent state under the federal structure of Government of India and Indian Parliament. But within the very limited powers vesting in "STATE RULING", doing very light steps for the well being of the peoples, but Indian National Congress and Sanghaparivar cannot admit such minute steps protecting the peoples.
//
At the stage of human development from prehistoric times "tribes" came into being and agriculture and animal husbandry began. There were only "humans" then, but no languages, religions or gods which known today. Languages, Gods and religions came into existence in different parts of the world only after slavery period and private property system started. Only the scientific knowledge of that time can be found in the religious books written at that time. The "super-intellectuals" of the time who created the religions decided and taught their followers that only their God were true and all others were "false". During tribes quarrels, the losers were killed in early times and in later times they were enslaved without being killed and their property was confiscated. As "tribes" emerged, the head of the tribe became the "king" and his assistants became "lords". The slaves were taught that "slavery" was "divine judgment" of God and he was convinced about the "soul", "heaven" and hell so that the "slave" would not try for liberation. The "slave" of that time also thought that if he endured all the hardships on this earth, he would be saved and when died he could go to heaven. No matter how much time has changed, religions are remains steadfast in the knowledge of the time they came into being; those who see religion or faith as an easy way to make money try to keep others also the same. Generally thoughtless people will believe only what they say is true. The fact that they were so numerous had led to the elimination of those who had tried to expose the unscientific nature of religions. Socrates, Sri Buddha, Karl Marx and others belong to that category. In India, those who belong to the tribe of "Aryans" are trying to overwhelm people with the knowledge of the ancient times such as brahmins came from face of "Brahma" etc. and continue the aggressive nature of the time when the tribes came into being. That is the basis of the anti-democratic and anti-socialist stance of the Hindu Extremists.
//
According to the concept of bourgeois political parties such as Indian National Congress, B J P, and Communal based political parties democracy means doing whatever they want with money and power - but it must be secret so that people can be fooled, and when getting money through any anti social activities, "money" will correct everything. That means money is above all else for them. They can't understand anything about "Man and Humanity" above the spirit of acute selfishness. They are the descendants of those who enslaved people and made money by making them work hard and suffering enormous cruelties in the past. When India got its independence in 1947, there were about five hundred local kings in India. Their wealth and power is protected by Indian National Congress and Bharatheeya Janatha Party (BJP) and they are keen in preventing SOCIALIST ideology in India even though SOCIALISM is also the target of Indian Constitution. Seventy-five
percent of India's total wealth is enjoyed by ten percent of the
population. Actually it is in the possession of sixty-five families.
90 percent of the people enjoying the rest of the wealth only 25%.
That means they are at or below the poverty line. Let us say bourgeois democracy or capitalism is the system that protects them all. Actual democracy, "PEOPLES" democracy have to be implemented in India and then only meaning of the word "democracy" is in effect. Only a single VOTE of each CITIZEN is required to implement actual "PEOPLES" democracy and that is the merit of actual democracy.
//
INC and BJP trying hard to restore their old "golden periods" of history again. Only when understanding what is "democracy" and what is not "democracy", actual "democracy" can be used as "weapon" against bourgeois and exploiters - anti social political political parties like INC, BJP etc. Actual democracy must be "Of the people, by the people and for the people". According to the "MARXIST" concept, democracy should be "PEOPLES' DEMOCRACY", where only the peoples interest can be solved. When admitting such a target, actual "democracy" can also be used as weapon against bourgeois and exploiters. Then the "VOTE" of each and every employ and those who are the victims of the exploiters can be used against bourgeois to protect their own interest. It is a struggle against the prevailing system of exploitation; it is a struggle for a socialist system. True democracy or people's democracy must be the rule of the people. Bourgeois politicians consider it respectable to acquire wealth beyond one's means and thus to be accused in cases. Because money is important to them. "Of the people, by the people, for the people" does not seem like a serious matter to them. They cannot accept an impartial press and an impartial judicial system.
//
The fact is that common people have not understood what democracy actually is. Democracy came into being by abolishing the monarchy which existed for a very long time. What happens in a democracy is that the sovereignty of the country, which was centered in the king or the emperor in the monarchy, is transferred to the individual citizens. The peculiarity of democracy is not only that every citizen is entitled to hold any office in the country if the people so demand. the future of the country; every citizen has the power to decide what the future of the people should be. Of course, the administration of the country cannot be carried forward in a democracy except through political parties. People should also be convinced of the interests of political parties on different issues. It is often the case that "independents" who come into the field under the pretense of having no "politics" in their own minds, the selfishness which they keep secret in their own minds, soon comes out when they get power, and the national interest is at stake.
//
The fact is that common people have not understood what democracy actually is. Democracy came into being by abolishing the monarchy which existed for a very long time. What happens in a democracy is that the sovereignty of the country, which was centered in the king or the emperor in the monarchy, is transferred to the individual citizens. The peculiarity of democracy is not only that every citizen is entitled to hold any office in the country if the people so demand. the future of the country; every citizen has the power to decide what the future of the people should be. Of course, the administration of the country cannot be carried forward in a democracy except through political parties. People should also be convinced of the interests of political parties on different issues. It is often the case that "independents" who come into the field under the pretense of having no "politics" in their own minds, the selfishness which they keep secret in their own minds, soon comes out when they get power, and the national interest is at stake. During the period of "monarchy", the total wealth of the country was concentrated in individuals and it was known as feudal lordship. Therefore, the vast majority lived in poverty and suffering. Therefore, it is the duty of every citizen to ensure a happy life for all the people and to implement a situation where wealth is not concentrated in few individuals and the benefits should reach the entire society instead of in the days of royal rule. Only through that, all the citizens will have a chance to be convinced of what real democracy is.
//
True democracy or people's democracy must be the rule of the people. People means all the citizens of that country. There should be no discrimination in the name of God or in the name of caste and religion. Because any thing (consumables) is created when land and human labor join together. There are no caste-religion differences in it. There are no caste-religion differences for everyone's needs. There are no caste-religion differences in consumption goods including agricultural products.
//
In democracy, people only have a choice whether to vote or not and they cannot regulate how political parties should function; they cannot control as what their actions should be. When "COMMUNIST PARTIES" deciding to neglect MARXISM, neglect SOCIALISM, and deciding to promote CAPITALISM, they are helpless. In India, the Constitution itself recognizes socialism. Communist parties are not ready to admit that too. In post-independence India, the people placed a lot of faith in the Indian National Congress. They welcomed Jawaharlal Nehru's pro-public sector stance. They gave the Congress a four-fifths majority in the Indian Parliament when Indira Gandhi nationalized Banks and Oil companies and adopted "SOCIALISM" in the Constitution itself. But when the Indian National Congress turned out to be totally anti-socialist and a barrage of corruption-bribery-scams, the people could only do away with them from the ruling of India.//When "Communist movements" in India decided became anti-socialist and free growth of capitalism, the people also decided not to vote them. That is what led to a very large majority in the Bengal state assembly in 1977, which changed the position that they should not rule there. If the communist leaders do not know what Marxism is or what democracy is, the only option for the people is not to vote them. The solution they found in Bengal was to join the Indian National Congress, which had removed the Indian people from power neglecting the ideology MARXISM in total.
//
The error committed by the communist movements is the error in understanding what is "capitalism" and what is democracy. They decided that capitalism is the management of the production of "commodities" (products) by private individuals. But "Capitalism" actually the regulations and laws that control and bind workers that had been continued since the days of slavery. No human rights were allowed to the "slave". In "Manusmriti"; "Shudra" should not acquire wealth and should not educated, all are part of "Sanathanadharma". Marxism is the philosophy to end them all. If someone gets things wrong, they become a nuisance to others. That is the setbacks faced by communist movements in Indian politics. There too the only thing people can do is not to "vote". When PK Vasudevan Nair and Pannyan Ravindran, who were unblemished in public life, became candidates for the "Thiruvananthapuram" parliamentary constituency in Kerala, people did not consider their caste or religion, but elected. But when the Communist Party itself looked at caste and religion, the people defeated the candidates. When "communist" movements see no harm in fully embracing capitalism, the only thing people can do is not "vote", because they are victims of the "CAPITALISM" for thousands of years back. They don't even understand that the "English East India Company" which conquered India for a long time was an outgrowth of capitalism.
//06 12 2023//
