514. "Marxism" is named after Karl Marx. WHY?

514. "Marxism" is named after Karl Marx. WHY?

Frederich Engels was the person who helped Marx a lot in the formation of "Marxism". But Marxism is named after Karl Marx. When Engels was once asked about it, he said: "Its only just and justice that the ideas "MARXISM" should be in the name of Karl Marx and even the actual contents of COMMUNIST MANIFESTO was Marx' alone. He was not a man, but genius in its true spirit"...."Marx saw too far and too high". what does that mean? Karl Marx saw the entire history of the human race. "Class struggle" means that class struggle also started with the emergence of slavery and private property. It means that class struggle also started with the advent of slavery and private property. The interests of the slave and the slave owner are different. There are two lives of the oppressor and the oppressed. Both are human. But the "OPPRESSOR" can't see others are human beings. But the oppressors are financially powerful. The "governing structure" and the entire laws created by the "oppressor" with the intention of safeguarding their interest; and it is for them. The "oppressed" are everywhere in the world. Karl Marx was able to understand their problems. That's what Engels said -- that Karl Marx saw too high and too far.

//

Engels, Lenin; Mao, Fidel Castro etc. also had understood everything what said by Karl Marx that "saw too far and too high"; But the "communist" leaders of India, who did not understand a single thing, had no idea about it. If anyone in India understood, they would tell others. The only proof that K Damodaran and EMS did not understood anything is that they decided to grow Indian capitalism. Those who do not know the meaning of the word "exploitation" will not understand anything when we say a non-exploitative social system. They are in very high position of communist parties. Now they think that if they admit that Marxism is not for "capitalism", they will be defamed. They do not have the mental maturity to understand that their position affects the future of a country of 140 million people.

//

Anybody understanding the basic of CLASS STRUGGLE THEORY that the CONTRADICTIONS BETWEEN THE INTEREST OF SLAVE AND SLAVE OWNER or at present between WORKERS AND BOURGEOISE OR EXPLOITERS, will never decide to promote exploitation of capitalism. Before MARXSISM, there are no choice, only to eliminate the social system, CAPITALISM.

The findings of Karl Marx was absolutely right; which proving through the actions of Anti-socialist; Anti Marxsist struggle led by the United States with all reactionary and capitalist-imperialist powers around the world to Marxist ideas. In it all the exploitative interests of all countries converge to be protected. Racism is only one of them. There too the economic interests of the exploiters are protected. Congress and BJP are one of them in India. In Kerala KPCC president K Sudhakaran is Congress; and BJP. AK Antony is Congress; and BJP. Shashi Tharoor and others are one of them. The biggest danger facing the Indian working class and the Indian people is that the "Communist" leadership in India is uniting with their economic interests. Their position is to continue economic exploitation; only the leadership has to change. If they don't change their stance, the name "communist" is changed is more appropriate.

//

BEFORE "MARXSISM", BJP AND INC ARE NOTHING. BUT HOW CAN GIVE A CHANCE TO MARXSISM TO HANDLE INDIAN POILITICS? IS IT IMPOSSIBLE? CPI(M) PB IS FAR AWAY FROM MARXSISM. According to CPIM PB, ONLY CAPITALISM IS MARXSISM.

//

Those who do not understand what is "Marxism" will not understand what is "Socialism", what is the purpose of SOCIALISM, and what is Capitalism and what is Congress and who are "CLASS ENEMY". They will say often that there are no "PERMANENT ENMITY" to anybody. It is the merit of promoting capitalism; total rejecting MARXSISM. They will not have a difference of opinion whether Congress or BJP is ruling India. They do not understand what is the relevance of public sector. It will never be understood if they are told that the utmost importance should be given to them to protect the public sector. They are governed themselves by the basic concept of capitalism; only acute "selfishness". Certainly it is only incapability of understading MARXSISM. Due to promoting "CAPITALISM" for 3/4th century, and the "leaders" only from elite wing of the society considering their route through students organisations, entire concept of representing working class interest have also lost and so "COMMUNIST PARTY" also just an ordinary bourgeoise political party and hence, "ANTI SOCIALIST" concept is also a must. It is impossible to change the "leaders" from their bourgeoise attitude.

//

Unfortunately, in India with a population of over 140 crores, there is no one who can understand what Engels said about Marx. A country's failure those carrying the words and picture Karl Marx, without understanding even one word of the great man, Karl Marx. They can't see anything difference about the "OPPRESSOR" and the "OPPRESSED" even though with the history of one century. Killing by buring in "live" is going on throughout the country in various forms, but those holding RED FLAG considering just common phenomina in a society.

/

BEFORE "MARXSISM", BJP AND INC ARE NOTHING. BUT HOW CAN GIVE A CHANCE TO MARXSISM TO HANDLE INDIAN POILITICS? IS IT IMPOSSIBLE? CPI(M) PB IS FAR AWAY FROM MARXSISM. According to CPIM PB, ONLY CAPITALISM IS MARXISM. But it is proved beyond doubt that without SOCIALISM, there are no MARXSISM.

Without the target of socialism, it will remain only a play field of HINDU FUNDAMENTALISTS, with the fact that nobody can prevent them and without SOCIALISM, MARXSISM also can't exist and the history of 3/4 century in India also proved so. Without ideology base; those who remains only just for "benefits" will not remain more and the history of Bengal also teaching so.

NOT ONLY; BUT ALSO....

//

IT IS THE BASIC UNDERSTANDINGS OF KARL MARX THAT "ONLY ECONOMICAL BASE STRUCTURE OF THE COUNTRY WILL DECIDE ITS POLITICAL AND CULTURAL UPPER STRUCTURE". (A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy Book by Karl Marx). IT MEANS IN CAPITALISM; ONLY BOURGEOIS WILL DECIDE WHO MUST BE THEIR RULERS AND THEY WILL NOT ADMIT A COMMUNIST PARTY TO RULE THEM AND TO DECIDE THEIR DEALINGS. THE EXPERIENCE SINCE 1950s IN INDIA; WE CAN ADMIT THIS AND THE GROWTH OF THE COMMUNIST MOVEMENT ALSO PROVE IT. With the concept to promote CAPITALISM; IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH PEOPLES DEMOCRACY IN CAPITALISM.

"KARL MARX IS RIGHT".

Lenin specifically saying in his almost all books that "ONLY ECONOMICAL BASE STRUCTURE OF THE COUNTRY WILL DECIDE ITS POLITICAL AND CULTURAL UPPER STRUCTURE". In India; nobody could understood it; even Com EMS. So implementing the program is impossible; according to Karl Marx with the concept to promote the Feudal and 4 caste system with the supremacy of BRAHMINISM". "ECONOMIC BASE STRUCTURE WILL DECIDE ITS POLOITICAL AND CULTURAL UPPER STRUCTURE.

WE NEED NO CHANGE IN THIS REGARD ALSO?

// 04 03 2023 //