312. INDIAN "MAOISM" IS NOT MARXISM.
//
"IN DEMOCRACY" ACTUAL "POWERS" TRANSFERING FROM MONARCHY TO "PEOPLES" AND HUMANITY CANNOT GO TO HISTORY AGAIN. IN DEMOCRACY, EACH CITIZENS ARE HOLDING "POLITICAL POWER" AND THEY CAN DECIDE WHO MUST BE THE RULERS. ANY BOURGEOISE POLITICAL PARTIES MISUSING "DEMOCRACY", IS NOT THE FAULT OF DEMOCRACY; BUT ONLY THOSE POLITICAL PARTIES MISUSING DEMOCRACY HOLDS ITS RESPONSIBILITY. DEMOCRACY CANNOT REGULATE ANY POLITICAL PARTIES AND IT SHOULD DECIDE BY THEMSELVES//
//
.........THE IDEAS CALLED AS "MARXISM" IS CONSISTING OF THREE PARTS NAMED AS MARXIAN ECONOMY INCLUDING SURPLUS VALUE THEORY; CLASS STRUGGLE THEORY AND MATERIALISM AND DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM. THE WAY HOW TO GET IN POWER IS NOT A PART OF MARXISM. THE WAY OF ARMED REVOLUTION NECESSITATING ONLY IN A KINGDOM; RULED BY A KING AND THERE ARE NO CHANCE TO BECOME IN POWER THROUGH GENERAL ELECTION AND THE PEOPLES HAVE TO BE REMOVED THE KING FROM POWER. NO SUCH SITUATION IS EXISTING IN INDIA. ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA; INDIA IS A COUNTRY UNDER THE CONCEPT "SOVEREIGN; SECULAR; SOCIALIST; DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC".
//
The purpose of MARXSISM is SOCIALISM, an exploitation free social system, and the way to reach such a state of living is not the part of MARXSISM, and modern democracy is also most suitable for it, because the actual POWERS is vested with PEOPLES, and peoples can decide their living circumstances also.
//
..........The way of Indian "MAOISTS" admitted actually only "ANTI SOCIAL" stand due to ignorance of actual position of Indian situations and ignorance of democracy. The method they are admitted is ARMED REVOLUTION and it cannot be implemented in Indian Politics. They are merely trying to repeat what had happened in old Russia or happened in China without convincing the contents of Indian CONSTITUTION which is giving them also to participate in election as candidate and they have right to propagate what ideas they are spreading in wild forest to backward peoples. Was this right existed in old Russia or in China or in India before 1947? The cause of their "stand" is the ignorance of "MOVEMENT THEORY" OF Karl Marx that every things are changing in each and every second. When there were KINGDOM was existed in any part of India; or India were under the rule of BRITAIN; their plan to catch power could be implemented. But at present; no such situation is existing anywhere in India. MAOISTS are not able to convince the DEMOCRACY existing in India; where all posts of ADMINISTRATION such as PRESIDENT of INDIA; Prime Minister etc. are only "elected" only for five years; and after their prescribed period; they will be ousted from power; if they are not electing for further period. "SOCIALISM", can be realized only through so many years through "SOCIALIST PLANNING" because there should be healthy and educated people in socialism and it can never be achieved through armed revolution.
//
"Political power" which was concentrated only in the king in "monarchy" shifted to individual citizens in democracy. Before the advent of democracy, there
were no other means of transferring political power from the monarch
other than "armed revolution". In democracy every citizen is entitled to
hold any "ADMINISTRATIVE POST OF THE COUNTRY. No one had the right to even think of such a thing in the monarchy. Whatever the intention of
"Hindu" communalists to make a woman "Draupadi Murmu" the President of
India, that woman is also entitled to hold the post of President, that
is the the glory of democracy.
//
The original meaning of the word "democracy" is "rule by the people". When
the monarchy existed, the political power of the country was vested in
the king alone. Monarchy has almost been wiped off from the face of the
earth. In "democracy" the political power of the "king" is transferred
to individual citizens. Any citizen is eligible to hold any office in
the country. A woman named "Droupadi Murmu" is eligible to hold the post
of "President of India" is the glory of democracy and unthinkable in the old royal days. If the meaning of democracy is to be complete, the concentration of wealth of the old monarchy must become part of the political structure of democracy. It is only possible through a "SOCIALIST ECONOMY". The content of Indian "CONSTITUTION" as Sovereign; Socialist; Secular and Democratic Republic" ; is obliged to implement in full meaning is obliged by each and every citizen.
//
..........And also those who are killing by MAOISTS are not actually their enemies; but only entering in Govt. Service through proper recruitment according to the rules and reservation of caste basis; only for maintaining mere life and they will be out of service when they attaining their maximum age eligibility in Government service. Perhaps; they also may be their parents or brothers. MAOISTS will get nothing by killing their brothers and parents.
..........They don't know the actual fact that the BOURGEOIS REVOLUTIONS (DEMOCRATIC REVOLUTIONS) of India were over during our Independence and when we got freedom from Britain in 1947. In European countries after demolishing "FEUDALISM" (DICTATORSHIP OF KING) (most probably it was armed revolutions); bourgeois were formed BOURGEOIS PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY. Almost all the European countries it was conducted through armed revolutions. In 17th-18th century due to the industrial revolution in European countries; a new economically strong wing became more powerful than the feudal lords and the feudal lords became weak economically. The new economically power wing (bourgeois) had not any kind of political power; (which was among the King and feudal lords) (their lands were not in their custody, which was possessed by the bourgeois on very few $ on lease; started agitations for parliamentary democracy with the support of working class which was ended in parliamentary democracy under the leadership of bourgeois.
..........INDIAN COMMUNIST LEADERS ARE ALSO NOT KNOW ABOUT DEMOCRATIC REVOLUTION OR BOURGEOIS REVOLUTION AND THEY ARE NOT ADMITTING THE TARGET - A SOCIALIST INDIA ONLY ON THIS SUBJECT AND THEY MERELY PROMOTING INDIAN CAPITALISM.
..........In India; our MAOISTS are trying to repeat BOURGEOIS REVOLUTIONS again through ARMED REVOLUTION and they are fighting against PEOPLES OF INDIA; those who are actually in power.
//13 11 2019//
അഭിപ്രായങ്ങളൊന്നുമില്ല:
ഒരു അഭിപ്രായം പോസ്റ്റ് ചെയ്യൂ