. .There were no directions issued by KARL MARX; FREDERIC ENGELS; LENIN OR ANYBODY THAT "WHAT SHOULD BE SOCIALISM" in each country. They had invented only some ideas about the society; how the wealth of the country being built on; what is the reasons of poverty; etc. To establish SOCIALISM in India; we should have find out our own solutions; because we cannot follow any other countries as such in India. We could have corrected so many misunderstandings as almost all Comrades are keeping in their mind. And also there are enough and more Articles in Indian Constitution itself for a SOCIALIST COUNTRY such as Article 14 insisting "equality" among citizens; Article 51A(h) insisting "SCIENTIFIC TEMPRE" AS "FUNDAMENTAL DUTY OF EVERY CITIZENS"; Art.19 - freedom of opinion which enables to teach MARXSISM also in public; which were prevented during monarchy, as the Constitution itself "SOVEREIGN, SOCIALIST, DEMOCRATIC, SECU8LAR REPUBLIC OF INDIA". We want only to follow strictly implementing the Articles of Indian Constitution, as it was prepared by Dr B R Ambedkar.
.
At present, "GOVERNMENT" not considering to solve any problems of the CITIZENS, as they are considering that their duty is only protecting the "CORPORATES" because they will provide them money as much Crores they want and in return, all burdens should have afford the peoples of the country. But when the concept of SOCIALIST COUNTRY admitted, to solve the problems of the peoples will be the normal function of the "GOVERNMENT" because SOCIALISM is to protect the peoples, while CAPITALISTS FORM OF GOVERNMENT is to cheat the peoples and peoples only victims of the bourgeoise political parties. If "FARMERS" getting adequate price for their agricultural products; that will protect not only farmers; but the society also protected through farmers. If they can maintain their "life" properly, certainly that will help to develop the industrial sector also. If they have proper income from the agricultural field, they will construct their house; they will purchase house hold articles; perhaps somebody will purchase vehicles for their family use; certainly these will help the industrial sector in the country as a whole. But, if they are getting only two rupees for per KG tomatto; onian, etc. there happening nothing, but only suicide of the farmers.
. .Along with the political freedom of every citizen in "democracy" there is also an element of "compromise". When the majority rules, the non-majority has all the rights. Later, if the opposition gets a majority, they can also become the ruling party. But no one should adopt violent behavior. There was no such situations in monarchy. In a democracy, the bourgeoisie and the Hindu communalists are not ready to accept this. That is the reason for the violent protests against the socialist ideals and the left-wing government in Kerala, even though there is a majority of the people. The important thing is that if no one is prepared for the fallout, the murders of each other will continue. Those who do not ready to accept democracy will continue to kill each other. The concept that "DEMOCRACY" is against "SOCIALISM" is only FOOLISHNESS, as if peoples convinced the justice of socialism; 99% will admit and accept the justice of socialism and nobody can defend the justice of MARXSISM AND SOCIALISM because each and every items of "COMMODITIES" are being made by common peoples and working class in general; and admitting their privileges are only natural justice. They also have right to live in better amenities along with all others.
. .The pathetic stage of farmers will also adversely affect farm laborers and they are suffering the worst situation through out the country. All over India, agricultural laborers cannot live without getting a minimum wage of at least five hundred rupees a day. They and their children deserve education and fair living conditions. If they get a wage of at least five hundred rupees per day, it will help their dreams to blossom and indirectly other people in the society will also benefit from it because each and every sectors of social life are socially connected. The result will be better industrial growth through out the country. At least 10 Crores "CYCLES" will have sale; 5 lakh scooters sales will be result and these will affect the society as a whole. But without a "GOVERNMENT OF LEFT IDEOLOGY UNDER SOCIALIST CONCEPT; INDIAN FARMERS CANNOT IMAGINE SUCH SITUATION IN INDIA. If CPI(M) suggesting such plans, the farmers of India will whole heartedly support such plans and it is possible as per the present Indian CONSTITUTION itself, because CONSTITUTION OF INDIA holding the concept "SOCIALIST" also.
...........As a best Parliamentary system prevailing in India; and as there is no ban to propagate SOCIALIST ideas in common peoples; we cannot follow any other countries. And also without parliamentary procedure, no legal and judicial establishment is possible. And also; the production method adopted in other countries also must be reviewed in India. In a society; everybody will try to find out their own livelihood in various fields; there is no necessity to prevent them in any field; as long as those are inevitable parts of the society. They must be encouraged to maximise their out put; they must be honoured as admitting their products also as a part of SOCIALIST ECONOMY; but they should not make any kind of hurt to others by unnecessary competitions resulting ruin of others. We must admit that about 90% of the common man can only follow others; and if the rest of 10% have goodness in their mind; that will help 100% citizens of the country in prosperity and to become a wealthy nation.
.
. . .But as a general matter, LAND OWNERSHIP must be with SOCIALIST COUNTRY, and it can be handled by local self Government and can be entrusted with individuals for the production of agricultural and other products and when they are misusing, it can be taken over by the Self Governments.
.
..........But this will help only a limited portion of the development of the nation. The country as a whole must be in socialist planning and that will only help the nation to reach entire peoples in a developed stage. Everybody can avail land and buildings according to their necessities. But as a whole the entire land of the country (mines, etc) under the control of the nation. By permitting any body to render their abilities for the development of the country; we can also see that they are doing their contribution for the socialist society. But everybody must see that the process of making any kind of goods/services are the outcome of a series of services of employees. It is a fact that every products in one stage will be a raw material in the next stage. Here we must remember the words of Karl Marx; that everything is created by the labourers by direct and indirect involvement of working class.
.
. .In a SOCIALIST SOCIETY, the main concept is free from exploitation of manpower of working class, and so the method of production as far as possible will be under public ownership. Then the profit of the firm can be utilised for the welfare of the country and certainly the living standard of employees will be uplifted. The "GOVERNMENT" taking the responsibility of residence, medical treatment and education of their children. But in capitalism, the "GOVERNMENT" only planning to exploit them more and more and denying permanent employment and enhancing working hours. The quality and quantity can be controlled by the state, prices of each items can be controlled by the state, and also preventing "BLACK MONEY" and "BLACK MARKETTING", tax evasion, providing employment opportunities to youth with adequate income with reservation benefits to SC/ST and others, which only lead the country to industrial growth, etc. When admitting as a part of SOCIALIST ECONOMY under MARXIAN IDEOLOGY, the case will be entirely different and employees themselves will make sure that the firm will be in profit and an ASSET of the country. It is possible only when the country as a whole admitting SOCIALIST ECONOMY only under MARXIAN IDEOLOGY and under working class leadership. Only then the country can be considered as a SOCIALIST COUNTRY. But in a capitalist society, even the profit of the firm can be used for the country as as whole. But bourgeois rulers are not ready to admit such facts as they are considering politics also as a commercial item, they will do anything with utter selfishness and a spirit of their earnings and exploitation of the total society is the main moto of bourgeois politics. So in a capitalist society, public sector undertakings will always in lose and burden of the State.
.
.Most of the "COMMUNIST LEADERS" are reluctant to admit "democracy" for implementing SOCIALISM, which only stressing their ingorance about "democracy". "DEMOCRACY" also had a very long history from its birth, but those are entirely different from what is actually now existing. Actually "bourgeoise" not ready to admit exact "democracy" because in its true spirit; democracy protecting the actual interest of "peoples" which can be possible only in SOCIALISM. See the name of China is "PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CHINA" where "MONEY" cannot rule the peoples as in CAPITALISM; only the interest of "MONEY" OR "BOURGEOISE" will be protected. In India, actually "MONEY" is ruling the country and each and every interest of "MON EY" OR "BOURGEOISE" is quite safe through BOURGEOISE POLITICIANS. Exactly, "MODERN PARLIAMENTARY" democracy have some effect of the birth and the growth of old "USSR" and situations were changed all over the world after 2nd WORLD WAR. To defeat Germany, about 1.5 Crores men of old USSR had lost their life and their victory was very hard which was actually the power of MARXSISM, and if USSR had failed, the victory of NAZI/FACIST forces had been prevented even the present modern Parliamentary democracy. When "CHINA" also in the field of "SOCIALISM", about 2/3rd portion of world population became socialist, which also have some good effect in MODERN PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY.
.
A very good effect of "democracy" is freedom of opinion/media which give right of information, which enables COMMUNIST MOVEMENTS have right to teach about MARXSISM AND SOCIALISM IN WORKING CLASS AND COMMON PEOPLES; and if the victory of 2nd world war with NAZI/FACIST FORCES; these benefits will certainly denied. (Unfortunately, then "COMMUNISTS" decided to promote CAPITALISM OR EXPLOITATION AS "MARXSISM). As "INDIAN COMMUNIST" leaders are stern that they will only follow for establishing SOCIALISM in India through the method what had happened in old SOVIET UNION which known as "OCTOBER REVOLUTION HAPPENED IN 1917". As they know that the situations prevailing in India is entirely different from what was in old RUSSIA, but they don't know anything else to be done in India. It is the reason that both Communist Parties (CPI & CPI(M)) are reluctant to mention even the word "SOCIALISM" in India.
.
.But it is a fact that the so called "SOVIET UNION" is now only in history, and nothing can be followed in India. But the situations prevailing in India is entirely different from what was at Russia. In India, even the CONSTITUTION itself admitting "SOVEREIGN, SOCIALIST, DEMOCRATIC, SECULAR, REPUBLIC" and the "SOCIALIST" concept already admitted by the huge majority of India with 4/5 portions of Indian CITIZENS. As in "democracy" the political powers holding with the CITIZENS, if the COMMUNIST LEADERS asking peoples verdict for implementing SOCIALISM in India through admitting the peculiarities existing in India, certainly huge majority of peoples will admit India also moving towards socialism with Indian specifications.
It is a fact that "HISTORY WILL NOT REPEAT AS SUCH". There were no directions issued by KARL MARX; FREDERIC ENGELS; LENIN OR ANYBODY THAT "WHAT SHOULD BE SOCIALISM" in each country. They had invented only some ideas about the society; how the wealth of the country being built on; what is the reasons of poverty; etc. To establish SOCIALISM in India; we should have find out our own solutions; because we cannot follow any other countries as such in India.We could have corrected so many misunderstandings as almost all Comrades are keeping in their mind. And also there are enough and more Articles in Indian Constitution itself for a SOCIALIST COUNTRY. The most important Article of the Constitution is Article 14, which specifying "equality" among citizens; and only admitting MARXSISM the content of this Articles can be implemented successfully. And also Article 51A(h) specifying "SCIENTIFIC TEMPRE" become fundamental duty of each CITIZENS, is apt for defending caste menace of India.
.
.We want only to follow strictly implementing the Articles of Indian Constitution, as it was prepared by Dr B R Ambedkar and also changes can be made in the CONSTITUTION according to the peoples verdict. But without admitting the target of "SOCIALIST INDIA" with the concept of "MARXIAN IDEOLOGY" will not be capable to defend "HINDUTHWA". Without such target attending the GE of 2024 means only complete surrendering before "HINDU FUNDAMENTALISTS" and rejecting entire amenities enjoyed after Independence through democracy in India including "RESERVATION" benefits availed by "DALIT" and others through "INDIAN CONSTITUTION" because HINDU FUNDAMENTALISTS will declare India as "HINDU RASHTRA" and INlDIA will be 2000 years back in history.
/
Some "fools" suggesting to make coalition with "INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS" to defend "HINDUTHWA" is only cheating tactics as had happened in the GE of 2019, as INC wants only "HINDU RASHTRA" and anybody winning will be captured by BJP. Those "FOOLS" actually not "FOOLS", but they keeping their "BRAHMIN TACTICS" for everlasting "BRAHMIN" supremacy in India for ever. But through the history of 100 years, "MARXIAN" IDEOLOGY will be capable to defend "BRAHMIN SUPREMACY" and with SOCIALISM, the ideology MARXSISM will throw away BJP from India. Without understanding MARXSISM, nobody can convince its power, and if they convinced it, they will never make coalition with "CLASS ENEMIES" or promote CLASS ENEMIES, BOURGEOISE AND LAND LORDS OF INDIA. Only in RUSSIA, Lenin had convinced and the result was SOVIET UNION, THE VICTORY In 2ND WORLD WAR. PRESENT STAGE OF RUSSIA IS NOT THE FAULT OF MARXSISM, ONLY THOSE HANDLED IT, LIKE INDIA.
//04 01 2023//.
അഭിപ്രായങ്ങളൊന്നുമില്ല:
ഒരു അഭിപ്രായം പോസ്റ്റ് ചെയ്യൂ