//
The basic principle of democracy and social justice in SOCIALISM is that all the people are entitled to enjoy all the wealth of a country. But CAPITALISM, rooted in selfishness and exploitation, does not admit this. "HINDHUTHWA" deadly against SOCIALISM. In democracy, there are freedom of opinion/media which facilitate to convince the people about the justice of MARXISM and SOCIALISM, which were impossible during MARX's period and now citizens have freedom to elect anybody to rule them. The content of MARXISM is only to allow the worker/employ/farmer also have right to live in amenity which capitalism will never allow. During the period of MONARCHY, it was impossible. As the "CITIZEN" has political freedom also, they can decide the economic structure of the country to that of "SOCIALIST" also so as to suitable in democracy as mentioned in Indian Constitution whereas is "SOVEREIGN; SECULAR; SOCIALIST, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC". Indian Communist Movements should have come forward to implement the contents of Indian Constitution as the content of "SOCIALIST" were admitted by 4/5th portion of Indian citizens, with "PEOPLES" democracy as those voted are still existing with their verdict. Please see "HINDUTHWA" extremists are totally against the above contents of the CONSTITUTION.
//
Marx wrote in the introduction of the work
"A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy" were the words of the famous thinker "Dante"
"Here all doubt must be abandoned;
"Here all courage less thoughts must perish".
Marxism is only for socialism.
//
If the silly misunderstandings are changed, India will be ruled by the Communist Party. But it is impossible to be convinced that the present perceptions are wrong because they are the most powerful leaders of the party and they think changing will be shame to them. Only one of them is about "CAPITALISM". The second is about "DEMOCRACY". For the last 74 years since 1950, asking people's votes for the growth of CAPITALISM. But without changing the attitude towards CAPITALISM (final stage of CAPITALISM is IMPERIALISM) and admitting SOCIALISM as target of the Party, removal of HINDU EXTREMISTS from power is impossible. At present party is playing the role of "WITNESS" only as "NO ENMITY" to anybody.
//
In SOCIALISM the interests of the society as a whole protecting such as land for natural necessities, surety in house those who actually in need, food, health care, education, security in old age etc. while in CAPITALISM, keen in preventing everything to the people with the motivation of making "PROFIT" in each and every corner. Just change it as for socialism. But that is impossible, in India due to the rigid stand of CPIM Polit Bureau. "Capitalism" does not mean mere ownership of a firm; it is the dominance of wealth that has continued since the days of slavery and the laws created by the exploiting classes to protect their interests. The fact that no "human rights" were granted to the slave was just the beginning. In India, "MANUSMRUTHI" also a part of CAPITALISM. Brahminism in India also a part of it. All laws were made to protect the wealth of the rich. Before Modern Parliamentary Democracy, wealth was the basis of citizenship. Voting rights were limited to those who paid "taxes". With the advent of democracy came "citizenship" with the right to vote. Even the basis of women's social status was wealth. The method admitted in "PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CHINA" is admitting non Government organizations also a part of production of goods and services in SOCIALIST economy can be admitted in India also on strict guide lines.
//
Those who still think that the Indian National Congress will preserve India's SECULARISM
should learn lesson from the current plight of AK Antony and his son, who were considered by all to be the conscience keeper of the Congress. His son became the national secretary of BJP with the full support of Antony. The basic policy of Congress too is "Rama Rajya". On the other hand, the Hindu nation is firmly rooted in "MANUSMRUTHI". We can see the anti-communist-socialist nature of the Congress-Anthony in its full support to Narendra Modi in the Gujarat riots. Since 1957 when under the leadership of A K Antony in Congress, brought down the communist government in Kerala. When the BBC brought out the facts of the Gujarat riots, we saw the Congress giving full support to Narendra Modi. BJP AND INC keen in preventing the growth of SOCIALIST ideology in India.
//
It is the advantage of CHINA is that they have a healthy MARKET WITH THE POPULATION OF 140 CRORES WITH SOUND PURCHASING CAPACITY and the GOVERNMENT is stern with PEOPLES interest.
//
The psychology of bribery is that neither the receiver nor the giver likes it. Give and take with the situation. They also want such a situation to end. If the opportunity comes in elections, they will vote only against corruption. That is the reason for AAP's resounding victory in Delhi. If the "LEFT" forces raises the slogan of corruption-free India along with socialism, the Indian people will accept it. Therefore, there is no possibility of a government led by the Indian National Congress, which is a system of governance only based on bribery, bribery and scams, again in India or in Kerala. Hindu communalists (BJP), on the other hand, believe only in the philosophy of looting. Anyone can rob; It's just that they should be given their share. They also cannot save India. .Through the ruling of over 65 years, Indian National Congress proved their inability to save and protect India as they haven't any ideology and handed over India to BJP seeing politics everything as part of commercial dealings. The basis of BJP's Hindu Rashtra is that despite 65 years of Congress rule in Indian states, INC reluctant to educate the mass or at least to reach minimum literacy in citizens because Congress also wants the same politics of "RAM RAJ". According to bourgeois politics, no one should be human being and the superstitions and the caste system should continue for ever. Both BJP and Congress are the same when it comes to education and scientific awareness not reaching the common people. Because if the superstitions do not remain like that, the exploitative class politics will disappear. BJP also proved their incapability to save Indian peoples because both INC and BJP have only some feudal and exploitation based capitalist method of ruling which will only intended to secure the capitalist, four caste based elite wing of India. And also anybody voting for INC considering that INC is a secular party; nobody can confirm that the elected Congress men will be there for ever as basically INC and BJP are same and one for "RAM RAJ" and Gandhiji also were admitted "Varnashrama". Without permission of AMBANI & ADANI, both BJP & INC will do nothing. So the fate of Indian FARMERS or the price hikes of PETROLEUM items will not change until LEFT ideology reaching in power in India in 2024.
.
Even RAHUL and MAMATA had admitted that they are not sure whether their men will be with them, when BJP sacking them, how can peoples trust INC and TMC? But RED FLAG are in firm belief with its members. Now Indian CITIZENS are suffering too hardships and poverty and became the lowest stage in world level. 75% of the wealth of the country enjoying by only 10% elite wing and so 90% peoples are suffering acute poverty. So CPI(M) and LEFT DEMOCRATIC FORCES OF INDIA asking the peoples verdict to become INDIA to be a SOCIALIST COUNTRY only as per the CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, as according to the CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, India is a SOVEREIGN, SOCIALIST, SECULAR, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC.
/
Marx made it clear in the Communist Manifesto itself that the bourgeoisie placed money above all else. "Profit" - Maximum Profit only. It trampled all human values. Only "selfishness" anywhere. They declared: "No hawk flies over money". Dominated only by selfish aspirants. That is capitalism. Instead, there must be an order of man and humanity. That is the socialist system. In "democracy", the decision of the people is their vote. The peculiarity of democracy is that it has all the facilities to educate the people. It was not in the "monarchy".
//
The fundamental principle of Marxism and Socialism is that workers also have the right to live with dignity. Living decently means a habitable home; employment with adequate wages; Children's Education; better free treatment; Old age care etc. are all included.When the "CONSTITUTION" of the "STATE" admitting "SOCIALIST ECONOMY", it means the "GOVERNMENT" itself guaranteeing to every CITIZEN such amenities. If the "workers" and farmers get adequate income through their hard work, that will protect not only their family life, but that will help to promote the industrial sector also, as that will help a healthy custodians/market in all field. But the bourgeois political parties have no such intentions as their "POLITICS" only based on their "commercial" interest and that is the secret most of them under the grip of "E D". Newspapers including "Manorama" working hard to bury Marxism and Socialist ideas, Congress and Hindu/Islamic/Cristian reactionaries are one in this. Exploiting classes are of one mind to protect all existing (blind) beliefs. For that they need the backward classes to remain uneducated.The basic contents of Marxism is that workers also have the right to live in dignity. A fundamental rule of "CAPITALISM" is that it will never be allowed. Only "CORRUPTION" is their target and normal "food". That is why the bourgeois political parties like BJP, INC, etc. deadly against SOCIALISM and trying to wipe out RED FLAG from India and to eliminate permanent appointments completely. Even in the Army, permanent posts are being eliminated. "RESERVATION" benefits of backward sectors are denying in total. Maximum "contract appointments". Working hours raising to twelve hours. Low wages. Congress and BJP have no differences of opinion on any of these. (See the basic principle of Indian National Congress is also "RAM RAJ" which was only in a story, even though where "SHAMPOO" WAS KILLED FOR PRAYING). The future of India and our children?
//
Without admitting "SOCIALIST INDIA", defeating BJP is impossible. A "SINGLE VOTE" IS ENOUGH AND MORE FOR A NEW "SECULAR INDIA".
IN DEMOCRACY, ACTUAL POLITICAL POWER TRANSFERRING FROM MONARCHY (KING) TO PEOPLES, COMMUNIST MOVEMENTS CANNOT NEGLECT OR DECLINE ITS CONTENTS. DEMOCRACY IS MOST SUITABLE FOR SCIENTIFIC SOCIALISM ALSO AS IT CAN ENSURE THE PEOPLES SUPPORT IN ITS TRUE EFFECT.
//
Like "MATHEMATICS", MARXISM also only can work on THEORETICAL base. When saying that "THERE ARE NO CLASS ENEMIES", means only neglecting CLASS STRUGGLE THEORY, and declining MARXISM in total. Then the target of MARXISM; an exploitation free social system also declining. This is following since 1950s in India. When "PROMOTING CAPITALISM", "MARXISM" can't be in field.
//
A homeless-free Kerala is the target of the "Left Front" in Kerala.
If the target of the Left Front is changed to "INDIA" without Homeless", the Left Front will rule India without further delay. Your single "VOTE" is enough for it.
The philosophy of "Marxism" has the capacity to do so. It only requires the CPI(M) to accept the Party "PROGRAM" of "SOCIALIST INDIA".
//
The nature of CAPITALISM is "ADANI" AND "NARENDRA MODI". But in the issue of pay wage to employees, "BOURGEOIS" are one and same. Low wage of employees and low price of "farm products" will certainly reduce the industrial growth in general. How much reduce the wage, how much make profit more and more, how much cheat the society, etc. "ADANI" is only one example and the nature of bourgeois political parties. Only in SOCIALISM, the stage of employees and adequate prices for farm products can be make good.
//
Every things changing in each second; which is not the control of anybody; as old "COMPUTERS; LAND PHONES; and also "BRITISH RULING" changed even though they didn't liked so)//SO, SOCIALISM IN "INDIAN MODEL"//
. . .As "HISTORY" cannot repeat as such anywhere and those who are waiting to repeat OCTOBER REVOLUTION OR CHINESE REVOLUTION is impossible in India and also USSR also only in history and the method admitted in "CHINA" is entirely different from old SOVIET UNION and also transformation to SOCIALISM from CAPITALISM possible only with the "PEOPLES" consent, as in "DEMOCRACY" actual "POLITICAL POWERS" vested in common peoples. And also, the situations existing in India is entirely different from other countries, because in India the country is "SOVEREIGN, DEMOCRATIC, SOCIALIST, SECULAR REPUBLIC". The peculiarities of democracy is that each citizens are having "POLITICAL FREEDOM" and the "CONSTITUTION" also admitting with the contents of "SOCIALISM" also and there are no definition insisted its nature of SOCIALISM, and the peoples can decide what should be it. The right of "opinion" intends right of media and also through this facility, there are no ban on COMMUNIST MOVEMENTS and this facility were not existed in old RUSSIA or before 1947 in India. So in India, the "SOCIALISM" can be implemented through getting peoples verdict through the democracy existing in India.
//
Admitting Indian Constitution means admitting SOCIALISM as well. Karl Marx, Engels or no one had determined the "model" of socialism in all countries. The exploiters are trying to establish that because the old Soviet Union is gone, socialism and Marxism also vanished. The co-operation of the people in democracy is also more effective in the production of socialist society. The fact that parliamentary democracy has no legal barriers to bring socialist ideas among the people makes socialism more popular. Such were not the conditions in Russia in 1917 when the October Revolution took place. The opinion of some people that parliamentary democracy is not suitable for scientific socialism is only an expression of opinion arising from ignorance of what is Marxism and Socialism.
//
MALE - FEMALE EQUALITY OF THE CONSTITUTION.
It must be in actual field.
Under the Constitutional law, women have equal rights as men so as to enable them to take part effectively in the administrative of the country. How can it justify as per MARXISM?
//
Scientific views in social life cannot be formed without "SOCIALISM" which "MARXISM" admits. The scientism of the physical argument is essential to the fight against communalism and to point out the uniqueness of
the "female body" in the existence of life, to expose the discrimination shown by all religions against women. Unity and struggle between opposites is manifested in living beings through the male-female structure. A man and a man or a woman and a woman do not create a new child. A child can only be born when a perfect woman and a perfect man come together. Very rarely bacteria' virus etc. ; this is the mechanism of nature in all living things. Contradictory materialism is just natural law like "breathing" (IN & OUT). (There is unity and struggle between opposites, and the opposite of inward is outward. When we breathe, it helps all the functions of the body. It is the basis of scientific acceptance of "MARXISM" which no one can deny. While "NATURE" (or God) gave the woman the extremely difficult task of giving and protecting the child, including childbirth, "nature" gave the man the responsibility of providing her complete protection. That is what gave the man more strength. Although a female elephant does not have tusks, a male elephant have tusks. Everything that is necessary for the existence of life has been provided to all living things including human being. Instead of being seen alongside men, women who have to endure more suffering in the system that nature has set up for the creation of life are seen as second class only as "gods" who are human creations through men.In no other species is the "male" unfair to the female. Those who cannot absorb human culture; Women are seen as second class by those who see everything in the eyes of religion. Contradictory physical argument is just natural law like "breath-out". It is also the basis of science which accepts "Marxism" which no one can deny.
//
And also there are enough and more Articles in Indian Constitution itself for a SOCIALIST COUNTRY such as Article 14 insisting "equality" among citizens; (Only those admitting MARXISM can be implemented this Article successfully). Article 51A(h) insisting "SCIENTIFIC TEMPER" AS "FUNDAMENTAL DUTY OF EVERY CITIZENS"; Without admitting "MATERIALISM AND DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM", it is impossible to implement Article 51A(h) of Indian Constitution, which stressing "SCIENTIFIC TEMPER" should admit as "FUNDAMENTAL DUTY" of every citizens. Art.19 - freedom of opinion which enables to teach MARXISM also in public; which were prevented during monarchy, as the Constitution itself "SOVEREIGN, SOCIALIST, DEMOCRATIC, SECULAR REPUBLIC OF INDIA". We want only to follow strictly implementing the Articles of Indian Constitution, as it was prepared by Dr B R AMBEDKKAR.
//
. .There were no directions issued by KARL MARX; FREDERIC ENGELS; LENIN OR ANYBODY THAT "WHAT SHOULD BE SOCIALISM" in each country. They had invented only some ideas about the society; how the wealth of the country being built on; what is the reasons of poverty; etc. To establish SOCIALISM in India; we should have find out our own solutions; because we cannot follow any other countries as such in India. We could have corrected so many misunderstandings as almost all Comrades are keeping in their mind. And also there are enough and more Articles in Indian Constitution itself for a SOCIALIST COUNTRY such as Article 14 insisting "equality" among citizens; Article 51A(h) insisting "SCIENTIFIC TEMPER" AS "FUNDAMENTAL DUTY OF EVERY CITIZENS"; Art.19 - freedom of opinion which enables to teach MARXISM also in public; which were prevented during monarchy, as the Constitution itself "SOVEREIGN, SOCIALIST, DEMOCRATIC, SECU8LAR REPUBLIC OF INDIA". We want only to follow strictly implementing the Articles of Indian Constitution, as it was prepared by Dr B R Ambedkkar. Actually, those who are not admitting "MARXIAN IDEOLOGY", to implement Article 14 ("equality" among citizens); is impossible as to see everybody as "human being" only "MARXIST" can admit. Others only will neglect this clause and such as happening in India.
.
At present, "GOVERNMENT" not considering to solve any problems of the CITIZENS, as they are considering that their duty is only protecting the "CORP-ORATES" because they will provide them money as much Crores they want and in return, all burdens should have afford the peoples of the country. But when the concept of SOCIALIST COUNTRY admitted, to solve the problems of the peoples will be the normal function of the "GOVERNMENT" because SOCIALISM is to protect the peoples, while CAPITALISTS FORM OF GOVERNMENT is to cheat the peoples and peoples only victims of the bourgeois political parties. If "FARMERS" getting adequate price for their agricultural products; that will protect not only farmers; but the society also protected through farmers. If they can maintain their "life" properly, certainly that will help to develop the industrial sector also. If they have proper income from the agricultural field, they will construct their house; they will purchase house hold articles; perhaps somebody will purchase vehicles for their family use; certainly these will help the industrial sector in the country as a whole. But, if they are getting only two rupees for per KG tomato; onion, etc. there happening nothing, but only suicide of the farmers.
//
Along with the political freedom of every citizen in "democracy" there is also an element of "compromise". When the majority rules, the non-majority has all the rights. Later, if the opposition gets a majority, they can also become the ruling party. But no one should adopt violent behavior. There was no such situations in monarchy. In a democracy, the bourgeoisie and the Hindu communalists are not ready to accept this. That is the reason for the violent protests against the socialist ideals and the left-wing government in Kerala, even though there is a majority of the people. The important thing is that if no one is prepared for the fallout, the murders of each other will continue. Those who do not ready to accept democracy will continue to kill each other. The concept that "DEMOCRACY" is against "SOCIALISM" is only FOOLISHNESS, as if peoples convinced the justice of socialism; 99% will admit and accept the justice of socialism and nobody can defend the justice of MARXISM AND SOCIALISM because each and every items of "COMMODITIES" are being made by common peoples and working class in general; and admitting their privileges are only natural justice. They also have right to live in better amenities along with all others.
//
The pathetic stage of farmers will also adversely affect farm laborers and they are suffering the worst situation through out the country. All over India, agricultural laborers cannot live without getting a minimum wage of at least five hundred rupees a day. They and their children deserve education and fair living conditions. If they get a wage of at least five hundred rupees per day, it will help their dreams to blossom and indirectly other people in the society will also benefit from it because each and every sectors of social life are socially connected. The result will be better industrial growth through out the country. At least 10 Crores "CYCLES" will have sale; 5 lac scooters sales will be result and these will affect the society as a whole. But without a "GOVERNMENT OF LEFT IDEOLOGY UNDER SOCIALIST CONCEPT; INDIAN FARMERS CANNOT IMAGINE SUCH SITUATION IN INDIA. If CPI(M) suggesting such plans, the farmers of India will whole heartedly support such plans and it is possible as per the present Indian CONSTITUTION itself, because CONSTITUTION OF INDIA holding the concept "SOCIALIST" also.
//
As a best Parliamentary system prevailing in India; and as there is no ban to propagate SOCIALIST ideas in common peoples; we cannot follow any other countries. And also without parliamentary procedure, no legal and judicial establishment is possible. And also; the production method adopted in other countries also must be reviewed in India. In a society; everybody will try to find out their own livelihood in various fields; there is no necessity to prevent them in any field; as long as those are inevitable parts of the society. They must be encouraged to maximize their out put; they must be honored as admitting their products also as a part of SOCIALIST ECONOMY; but they should not make any kind of hurt to others by unnecessary competitions resulting ruin of others. We must admit that about 90% of the common man can only follow others; and if the rest of 10% have goodness in their mind; that will help 100% citizens of the country in prosperity and to become a wealthy nation.
.
But as a general matter, LAND OWNERSHIP must be with SOCIALIST COUNTRY, and it can be handled by local self Government and can be entrusted with individuals for the production of agricultural and other products and when they are misusing, it can be taken over by the Self Governments.
.
But this will help only a limited portion of the development of the nation. The country as a whole must be in socialist planning and that will only help the nation to reach entire peoples in a developed stage. Everybody can avail land and buildings according to their necessities. But as a whole the entire land of the country (mines, etc) under the control of the nation. By permitting any body to render their abilities for the development of the country; we can also see that they are doing their contribution for the socialist society. But everybody must see that the process of making any kind of goods/services are the outcome of a series of services of employees. It is a fact that every products in one stage will be a raw material in the next stage. Here we must remember the words of Karl Marx; that everything is created by the laborers by direct and indirect involvement of working class.
.
In a SOCIALIST SOCIETY, the main concept is free from exploitation of manpower of working class, and so the method of production as far as possible will be under public ownership. Then the profit of the firm can be utilized for the welfare of the country and certainly the living standard of employees will be uplifted. The "GOVERNMENT" taking the responsibility of residence, medical treatment and education of their children. But in capitalism, the "GOVERNMENT" only planning to exploit them more and more and denying permanent employment and enhancing working hours. The quality and quantity can be controlled by the state, prices of each items can be controlled by the state, and also preventing "BLACK MONEY" and "BLACK MARKETING", tax evasion, providing employment opportunities to youth with adequate income with reservation benefits to SC/ST and others, which only lead the country to industrial growth, etc. When admitting as a part of SOCIALIST ECONOMY under MARXIAN IDEOLOGY, the case will be entirely different and employees themselves will make sure that the firm will be in profit and an ASSET of the country. It is possible only when the country as a whole admitting SOCIALIST ECONOMY only under MARXIAN IDEOLOGY and under working class leadership. Only then the country can be considered as a SOCIALIST COUNTRY. But in a capitalist society, even the profit of the firm can be used for the country as as whole. But bourgeois rulers are not ready to admit such facts as they are considering politics also as a commercial item, they will do anything with utter selfishness and a spirit of their earnings and exploitation of the total society is the main moto of bourgeois politics. So in a capitalist society, public sector undertakings will always in lose and burden of the State.
.
.Most of the "COMMUNIST LEADERS" are reluctant to admit "democracy" for implementing SOCIALISM, which only stressing their ignorance about "democracy". "DEMOCRACY" also had a very long history from its birth, but those are entirely different from what is actually now existing. Actually "bourgeois" not ready to admit exact "democracy" because in its true spirit; democracy protecting the actual interest of "peoples" which can be possible only in SOCIALISM. See the name of China is "PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CHINA" where "MONEY" cannot rule the peoples as in CAPITALISM; only the interest of "MONEY" OR "BOURGEOIS" will be protected. In India, actually "MONEY" is ruling the country and each and every interest of "MONEY" OR "BOURGEOIS" is quite safe through BOURGEOIS POLITICIANS. Exactly, "MODERN PARLIAMENTARY" democracy have some effect of the birth and the growth of old "USSR" and situations were changed all over the world after 2nd WORLD WAR. To defeat Germany, about 1.5 Crores men of old USSR had lost their life and their victory was very hard which was actually the power of MARXISM, and if USSR had failed, the victory of NAZI/FACIST forces had been prevented even the present modern Parliamentary democracy. When "CHINA" also in the field of "SOCIALISM", about 2/3rd portion of world population became socialist, which also have some good effect in MODERN PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY.
.
A very good effect of "democracy" is freedom of opinion/media which give right of information, which enables COMMUNIST MOVEMENTS have right to teach about MARXISM AND SOCIALISM IN WORKING CLASS AND COMMON PEOPLES; and if the victory of 2nd world war with NAZI/FASCIST FORCES; these benefits will certainly denied. (Unfortunately, then "COMMUNISTS" decided to promote CAPITALISM OR EXPLOITATION AS "MARXISM). As "INDIAN COMMUNIST" leaders are stern that they will only follow for establishing SOCIALISM in India through the method what had happened in old SOVIET UNION which known as "OCTOBER REVOLUTION HAPPENED IN 1917". As they know that the situations prevailing in India is entirely different from what was in old RUSSIA, but they don't know anything else to be done in India. It is the reason that both Communist Parties (CPI & CPI(M)) are reluctant to mention even the word "SOCIALISM" in India.
.
.But it is a fact that the so called "SOVIET UNION" is now only in history, and nothing can be followed in India. But the situations prevailing in India is entirely different from what was at Russia. In India, even the CONSTITUTION itself admitting "SOVEREIGN, SOCIALIST, DEMOCRATIC, SECULAR, REPUBLIC" and the "SOCIALIST" concept already admitted by the huge majority of India with 4/5 portions of Indian CITIZENS. As in "democracy" the political powers holding with the CITIZENS, if the COMMUNIST LEADERS asking peoples verdict for implementing SOCIALISM in India through admitting the peculiarities existing in India, certainly huge majority of peoples will admit India also moving towards socialism with Indian specifications.
It is a fact that "HISTORY WILL NOT REPEAT AS SUCH". There were no directions issued by KARL MARX; FREDERIC ENGELS; LENIN OR ANYBODY THAT "WHAT SHOULD BE SOCIALISM" in each country. They had invented only some ideas about the society; how the wealth of the country being built on; what is the reasons of poverty; etc. To establish SOCIALISM in India; we should have find out our own solutions; because we cannot follow any other countries as such in India.We could have corrected so many misunderstandings as almost all Comrades are keeping in their mind. And also there are enough and more Articles in Indian Constitution itself for a SOCIALIST COUNTRY. The most important Article of the Constitution is Article 14, which specifying "equality" among citizens; and only admitting MARXISM the content of this Articles can be implemented successfully. And also Article 51A(h) specifying "SCIENTIFIC TEMPER" become fundamental duty of each CITIZENS, is apt for defending caste menace of India.
.
.We want only to follow strictly implementing the Articles of Indian Constitution, as it was prepared by Dr B R Ambedkar and also changes can be made in the CONSTITUTION according to the peoples verdict. But without admitting the target of "SOCIALIST INDIA" with the concept of "MARXIAN IDEOLOGY" will not be capable to defend "HINDUTHWA". Without such target attending the GE of 2024 means only complete surrendering before "HINDU FUNDAMENTALISTS" and rejecting entire amenities enjoyed after Independence through democracy in India including "RESERVATION" benefits availed by "DALIT" and others through "INDIAN CONSTITUTION" because HINDU FUNDAMENTALISTS will declare India as "HINDU RASHTRA" and INDIA will be 2000 years back in history.
/
Some "fools" suggesting to make coalition with "INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS" to defend "HINDUTHWA" is only cheating tactics as had happened in the GE of 2019, 2024 as INC wants only "HINDU RASHTRA" and anybody winning will be captured by BJP. Those "FOOLS" actually not "FOOLS", but they keeping their "BRAHMAN TACTICS" for everlasting "BRAHMAN" supremacy in India for ever. But through the history of 100 years, "MARXIAN" IDEOLOGY will be capable to defend "BRAHMAN SUPREMACY" and with SOCIALISM, the ideology MARXISM will throw away BJP from India. Without understanding MARXISM, nobody can convince its power, and if they convinced it, they will never make coalition with "CLASS ENEMIES" or promote CLASS ENEMIES, BOURGEOIS AND LAND LORDS OF INDIA. Only in RUSSIA, Lenin had convinced and the result was SOVIET UNION, THE VICTORY In 2ND WORLD WAR. PRESENT STAGE OF RUSSIA IS NOT THE FAULT OF MARXISM, ONLY THOSE HANDLED IT, LIKE INDIA.
//
"SOCIALISM" can only be implemented in a sovereign COUNTRY. None of the states in India are "SOVEREIGN". The vision of socialism is that the total wealth of the country should benefit all citizens. In SOCIALISM the interests of the society as a whole protecting such as land for all at least natural necessities, surety in house those who actually in need, food, health care, education, security in old age etc. while in CAPITALISM, bourgeois keen in preventing everything to the people with the motivation of making "PROFIT" in each and every corner. Just change it as for socialism. In Modern Parliamentary "DEMOCRACY" people can express their willingness for SOCIALISM through their "VOTE".
//
When the private sector also included in the production of goods in a socialist system, as practiced in China, the production of essential goods becomes more popular. It will lead to more and more inventions and new gadgets to suit people's tastes. It will also lead to a large number of employment opportunities.// "Capitalism" does not mean mere ownership of a firm; it is the dominance of wealth that have been continued since the days of slavery and the laws created by the exploiting classes to protect their interests. The fact that no "human rights" were granted to the slave was just the beginning. In India, "MANUSMRUTHI" also a part of CAPITALISM. Brahminism in India also a part of it. All laws were made to protect the wealth of the rich. Before Modern Parliamentary democracy, wealth was the basis of citizenship. Voting rights were limited to those who paid "taxes". With the advent of democracy came "citizenship" with the right to vote. Even the basis of women's social status was wealth.
//
The fundamental principle of Marxism and Socialism is that workers also have the right to live with dignity. Capitalism and the bourgeois political parties are adamant that it will never be allowed. If the "workers" and farmers get adequate income through their hard work, that will protect not only their family life, but that will help to promote the industrial sector also, as that will help a healthy custodians/market in all field.
////04 01 2023//.
അഭിപ്രായങ്ങളൊന്നുമില്ല:
ഒരു അഭിപ്രായം പോസ്റ്റ് ചെയ്യൂ