498. Reasons of the drawbacks of COMMUNIST MOVEMENTS in India.
// // // //
KARL MARX INTRODUCED THE IDEOLOGY "MARXSISM" ONLY FOR DEMOLISHING CAPITALISM AND ESTABLISHING SOCIALISM. But in India, Indian "COMMUNIST" leaders decided during 1950s, to promote Indian CAPITALISM and for the last 72 years since 1950s, continuing the same policy. In the absense of SOCIALISM, and strengthening "BOURGEOISE" (CLASS ENEMIES) MARXSIST IDEOLOGY is not in action in India. In India, only "POLITICAL DECISION" of the "COMMUNIST PARTIES" required to establish SOCIALISM IN INDIA as the "CONSTITUTION" itself admitting "SOCIALISM" also which facility were not existed anywhere in the "WORLD".
//
Some "UTTER FOOLS" will answer to the comments in "CONFERENCES" that the reasons of the drawbacks in India is the "CASTE MENACE" of India. The actual fact of "CASTE MENACE" is only ignorance of the justice of MARXSISM, justice of SOCIALISM; as when SOCIALISM was as working PROGRAMME, EMS, a "BRAHMIN" and LAND LORD of Kerala was the leader of the COMMUNIST MOVEMENT OF INDIA. ANYBODY, HAVING GOOD QUALITIES WILL ADMIT MARXSISM AND SOCIALISM AND THE EXAMPLE WAS EMS ITSELF. During the period of 1920--50, everybody had joined the COMMUNIST MOVEMENT without the descrimination of wealth or caste. Even Karl Marx or Frederic Angles were not actual "workers" but could convince the justice of MARXSISM AND SOCIALISM. In India, after 1950s, when CAPITALISM became as WORKING PROGRAMME, everybody quitting the movements.
//
And some fools will answer that there are "FEUDALISM" existing. They don't know what is feudalism. Actually, "FEUDALISM" was only in MONARCHY, and when INDIA became a REPUBLIC, there are no "MONARCHY" in India. Now each CITIZENS are having political freedom and they can become candidate to any post to rule the country, they can nominate anybody, and they can vote anybody to rule the country. In MONARCHY, it was impossible as the "KING" above all and "SUPREME" of everything. Actually they can't understand what is "DEMOCRACY"and humanity can't go to history again. If convincing the common peoples about what is SOCIALISM, certainly they will vote for socialism. And also "history" cannot repeat anywhere as such, in India, only "INDIAN MODEL SOCIALISM" by admitting the Constitution of India, with admitting SOCIALISM also, as such facilities where not existed anywhere in the history for establishing SOCIALISM. And also, Karl Marx, Frederic Angels or anybody else decided what should be in each country. As "MARXSISM" considering as "SCIENCE" and SCIENCE will admit changes at everywhere.
//
The actual fact is that since 1950s, in India the "COMMUNIST" leaders had dedcided that "INDIAN CAPITALISM" is not "mature" to establish "SOCIALISM". It was only foolishness, as science and technology changing everyday, nothing can be preserved from CAPITALISM to SOCIALISM. Lenin had no doubt about the maturity of capitalism in old Russia, even though the then RUSSIA was only initial stage in capitalism. They don't know the facts that during 1850s itself Karl Marx found the then "WORLD" had been matured to establish socialism and so he exhorted the WORKING CLASS OF THE WORLD, "UNITE, YOU HAVE NOTHING TO LOSS, A WORLD IS AWAITING FOR YOU". Then Karl Marx considered the growth of the "ENGLISH EAST INDIA COMPANY" which was the ruling force of India during 1850 and the "GREAT" BRITAIN had a "SUN NEVER SET KINGDOM".
//
Even 72 years, since 1950s by promoting capitalism, neglecting SOCIALISM, and the poor stage of the PARTY, is not sufficient to admit the words of Lenin, is clear that CPIM Polit Bureau is purposely cheating Indian Working Class by using the name of "COMMUNIST" only to destroy the COMMUNIST MOVEMENT OF INDIA. and establishing a "HINDU RASHTRA" in India. It is not ignorance of MARXSISM, only purposeful cheating.
//
In India, the "leaders" have no ideas about what is "DEMOCRACY" WHICH OVERTHROWN "MONARCHY" from the world itself and in democracy, "PEOPLES" are actual ruling force. But "democracy" cannot insist how "POLITICAL PARTIES SHOULD FUNCTION OR HOW THEY SHOULD RULE THE COUNTRY. Indian "COMMUNIST" leaders are waiting to re-establish "MONARCHY" or the "TSAR EMPEROR" in India to repeat "OCTOBER REVOLUTION" again India. Even though USSR is only in history, "they" are stern in repeating "OCTOBER REVOLUTION" in India again. If the same is impossible, they will not admit socialism in any way. It is impossible to repeat "history" again anywhere, but the "utterr fools" are stern in their stand. As the "CONSTITUTION" itself admitting "SOCIALISM" an "INDIAN STYLE" can be followed, but they will not admit, as rejecting SOCIALISM is their prestige issue. The reason for their stand is that they swallowed some words from somewhere without understanding the meaning and they are adamant in those words. They can't admit the "LIFE MESSAGE OF KARL MARX", FOR WHAT PURPOSE HE HAD SPENT HIS LIFE, WHICH WAS ONLY FOR AN EXPLOITATION FREE SOCIAL SYSTEM, SOCIALISM. BUT MARX HADN'T INSISTED WHAT SHOULD BE SOCIALISM ANYWHERE, AND THAT WAS IMPOSSIBLE AT HIS PERIOD.
//
Actually only POLITICAL DECISION of the COMMUNIST PARTIES OF INDIA REQUIRED IN INDIA AS EVEN THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS A "REPUBLIC" with the concept of "SOCIALISM" also.
//
Due to the ignorance of MARXSISM, Indian COMMUNIST LEADERS POSTPONED THE TARGET OF SOCIALISM, NEGLECTING even the advise of V I LENIN, about the importance of SOCIALISM. (See my blog 105 also). And Indian COMMUNIST leaders promoting Indian "CAPITALISM" since 1950s and for the last 72 years, the same is continuing. In Bengal, they had captured 9127 farmers "land" about 1,00,000 acres and handed over to TATA, IN NANDEEGRAM FOR HIS CAR FACTORY. And also they handn't implemented "LAND REFORMS" in Bengal under the conclusion that the same will prevent the "FREE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM".
//
Actually those "PROMOTING CAPITALISM" wearing only "mask" of "COMMUNISTS" and actual COMMUNISTS OR MARXSISTS will never promote exploitation through CAPITALISM, or promote "CLASS ENEMIES" in any way.
//01 01 2023//
അഭിപ്രായങ്ങളൊന്നുമില്ല:
ഒരു അഭിപ്രായം പോസ്റ്റ് ചെയ്യൂ