114.WHAT GORBACHEV HAD DONE IN SOVIET UNION in 1991;
............S A Dange & Party had already implemented in India; 1950s itself. Marx invented MARXISM, only for a SOCIALIST SOCIETY and nothing could be done with the Marx' theory- MARXISM. But since 1950; SOCIALISM is not in the field of Indian working class movement; and decided to promote capitalism. From the experience of 70 years; even now nobody can find the reason for the drawbacks in India. It is considered that even mentioning the word "socialism" is liable to be punished on the charge of discipline. As there is no socialism for 70 years; no body have any remote understandings about socialism and they don't know what is the relation with peoples with the working class movement. They are not in worry why there is no party over all India; out of 28 states party is only in three states and even there the existence is in question. In Kerala; the party had been working since 1940s and upto 1957; we got 65 MLAs (42% of the peoples) in 1957 and now we have only one MP in Indian Parliament from Kerala. (42% of population) in Kerala. In Kerala, most of the cities are UDF FORTS. In West Bengal we are vanishing. Without socialism; what is to offer to the peoples and working class? As long as the present "program" is existing; we have nothing to offer to the peoples of India; because the "multi structure with various forms of ownership" is existing since 1947; being implemented by Congress in the name of "MIXED ECONOMY".
..........We cannot say to the peoples about our target is "free development of capitalism"; otherwise they will laugh. The so called "feudalism" is not a hindrance to Deerubai Ambani for his growth from Rs.15,000 to Rs.65,000 crores when he dies. According to bourgeois and bourgeois political parties, the word "free" (liberty) is to do anything according to their wishes and they will say that is "democracy." We will say for that "bourgeois democracy"; unfortunately at present our target is the same in the name "PEOPLES DEMOCRACY"; but should be our leadership. Anybody thinks it will happen?...........
If so, Karl Marks was only a fool; because he says - only the financial structure will decide its upper structure. Without "socialism"; we are baseless; arm-less; and non-theoritical. Peoples will go anywhere except us; because even though capitalism; we insisting materialism also. Nobody understanding for what purpose Marx invented the theory Marxism; including Surplus Value theory; Class Struggle theory and Materialism.
By admitting only SOCIALISM; we will have a scientific approach to social issues. By admitting capitalism; we will forced to admit the theory of capitalism; which is only selfishness and exploitation of everything including God.
As long as our stand is to promote capitalism; our position in India will not change; and peoples will not notice our leaders' words.
...........08 07 2015............
............S A Dange & Party had already implemented in India; 1950s itself. Marx invented MARXISM, only for a SOCIALIST SOCIETY and nothing could be done with the Marx' theory- MARXISM. But since 1950; SOCIALISM is not in the field of Indian working class movement; and decided to promote capitalism. From the experience of 70 years; even now nobody can find the reason for the drawbacks in India. It is considered that even mentioning the word "socialism" is liable to be punished on the charge of discipline. As there is no socialism for 70 years; no body have any remote understandings about socialism and they don't know what is the relation with peoples with the working class movement. They are not in worry why there is no party over all India; out of 28 states party is only in three states and even there the existence is in question. In Kerala; the party had been working since 1940s and upto 1957; we got 65 MLAs (42% of the peoples) in 1957 and now we have only one MP in Indian Parliament from Kerala. (42% of population) in Kerala. In Kerala, most of the cities are UDF FORTS. In West Bengal we are vanishing. Without socialism; what is to offer to the peoples and working class? As long as the present "program" is existing; we have nothing to offer to the peoples of India; because the "multi structure with various forms of ownership" is existing since 1947; being implemented by Congress in the name of "MIXED ECONOMY".
..........We cannot say to the peoples about our target is "free development of capitalism"; otherwise they will laugh. The so called "feudalism" is not a hindrance to Deerubai Ambani for his growth from Rs.15,000 to Rs.65,000 crores when he dies. According to bourgeois and bourgeois political parties, the word "free" (liberty) is to do anything according to their wishes and they will say that is "democracy." We will say for that "bourgeois democracy"; unfortunately at present our target is the same in the name "PEOPLES DEMOCRACY"; but should be our leadership. Anybody thinks it will happen?...........
If so, Karl Marks was only a fool; because he says - only the financial structure will decide its upper structure. Without "socialism"; we are baseless; arm-less; and non-theoritical. Peoples will go anywhere except us; because even though capitalism; we insisting materialism also. Nobody understanding for what purpose Marx invented the theory Marxism; including Surplus Value theory; Class Struggle theory and Materialism.
By admitting only SOCIALISM; we will have a scientific approach to social issues. By admitting capitalism; we will forced to admit the theory of capitalism; which is only selfishness and exploitation of everything including God.
As long as our stand is to promote capitalism; our position in India will not change; and peoples will not notice our leaders' words.
...........08 07 2015............
അഭിപ്രായങ്ങളൊന്നുമില്ല:
ഒരു അഭിപ്രായം പോസ്റ്റ് ചെയ്യൂ