445. IF WE ARE STERN IN THE WORDS OF COM. EMS, SOCIALISM WILL NEVER ADMIT BY CPIM IN INDIA. (See my blog 125 also).
//
Com. EMS couldn't understood the difference of ruling in Central Government and in any "STATE GOVERNMENT" as he stated in the book "WORKING CLASS POLITICS, SCIENCE AND ART" (Malayalam book, Page 53). When comparing the ruling of Kerala, as Com.EMS as CM), in 1957 and in 1967, both ruling in Kerala could not complete the "five years term", he said that in future also, if getting ruling again, will also only for short period, and so "SOCIALISM, EVEN SOCIAL CHANGES ARE IMPOSSIBLE THROUGH PARLIAMENTARY METHOD". He had stressed two things in his statement that 1. Through "PARLIAMENTARY METHOD", socialism is impossible and 2. If getting continuous ruling in any "STATE GOVERNMENT", "SOCIALISM IS POSSIBLE".
..
I can't admit his both points as the ruling of "STATE" in a federal system, only dependent on "CENTRAL GOVERNMENT" and POLITICAL AND ECONOMICAL SOVEREIGNTY IS VESTED ONLY IN CENTRAL GOVERNMENT. Only "PARLIAMENT" and Central Government can decide whether any "STATE" is necessary or not, and the powers of "STATE" are very normal as Judicial powers vested in Supreme Court, "Constitution of India" decides every actions of the State Government; major industries, Reserve Bank, etc. are under the Constitution and control of Central Golvernment. And even 34 years continuous ruling in Bengal also proved his versions are not correct.
..
And according to his first point, that SOCIALISM is impossible through "PARLIAMENTARY METHOD", is basically mistake and PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM IS THE SOCIAL SYSTEM OVERTAKEN BY OLD KINGS' REGIME AND HUMANITY CANNOT GO TO HISTORY AGAIN, AND ADMITTING PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM IS ONLY ADMITTING THE POWERS IS VESTED WITH "PEOPLES". ONLY THROUGH PASSING IN PARLIAMENT AND ASSEMBLIES, NORMAL RULING AND JUDICIAL ESTABLISHMENT IS POSSIBLE.
//
125. AT PRESENT WHAT IS "PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC REVOLUTION"?
//"WAGE SLAVERY" SHOULD NOT BECOME THE "PROGRAMME" OF A COMMUNIST PARTY//.
. ."PEOPLES DEMOCRACY" is impossible in CAPITALISM. It is possible only along with SOCIALISM. So CPI (M) should admit the target of "SOCIALIST ECONOMY THROUGH PEOPLES DEMOCRACY". See it is in China, "PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CHINA". When "PROMOTING CAPITALISM", "PEOPLES DEMOCRACY" is impossible.
........... In a book of Com.EMS, (Former General Secretary, CPI (M), (ARTS & SCIENCE OF WORKING CLASS POLITICS) (Page 53) he says that Lenin severely criticising BOURGEOIS PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM and that implementing SOCIALISM through PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM is impossible and even social changes are impossible. Here Com. EMS had happened a mistake that Lenin (In the book STATE AND REVOLUTION") actually criticising CAPITALISM and Lenin says that even "A best PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM" will be only a "WAGE SLAVERY" (WAGE COOLIE) to working class.
What is "wage slavery"? In old slavery system, slaves had the benefit of protection like cattles such as food (only capable to their existences) and shelter and in capitalism, bourgeois have not such responsibilities; but the worker should work under any bourgeois to his existences and at present he has the freedom to choice to whom he can sell his manpower; otherwise he must die. Com.EMS says in the same book; (Page 21) the necessity of "FREE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM" by severe blow on FEUDALISM. Com.EMS understood only that the words of Lenin relates to PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION PROCEDURES AND FORMING OF MINISTRY only.
.
. .Com. EMS couldn't understood the difference of ruling in Central Government and in any "STATE GOVERNMENT" as he stated in the book "WORKING CLASS POLITICS, SCIENCE AND ART" (Malayalam book, Page 53). When comparing the ruling of Kerala, as Com.EMS as CM), in 1957 and in 1967, both ruling in Kerala could not complete the "five year term", he said that in future also, if getting ruling again, will also only for short period, and so "SOCIALISM, EVEN SOCIAL CHANGES ARE IMPOSSIBLE THROUGH PARLIAMENTARY METHOD". He had stressed two things in his statement that 1. Through "PARLIAMENTARY METHOD", socialism is impossible and 2. If getting continuous ruling in any "STATE GOVERNMENT", "SOCIALISM IS POSSIBLE".
.
.............Lenin had decided to establish SOCIALISM in the dynasty of Tsar' where FEUDALISM IN ITS ALL
.EVILNESS and also the CAPITALISM of then Russia was in a pathetic condition only. Lenin was not ready to admit CAPITALISM even in that condition and reiterated the importance of SOCIALISM; where the organising of working class were arduous task.
.............He understood the actual spirit of MARXISM. In the same book, Com.EMS says that the class structure of PEOPLES DEMOCRACY will be same of BOURGEOIS DEMOCRACY. For BOURGEOIS CLASS STRUCTURE we are called as "CAPITALISM". So according to LENIN; our PEOPLES DEMOCRACY is only "WAGE SLAVERY".
............IN THE SAME BOOK IN PAGE 20 COM. EMS SAYS THAT "WHEN SOCIALIST TRANSFORMATION FROM CAPITALISM TO SOCIALISM IN WORLD LEVEL IS TAKING PLACE; INDIA WILL ALSO IN SOCIALISM.". OUR BASIC STAND IS THIS. THIS WAS THE STAND OF TROTSKI (TO MY INFORMATION) WHICH LENIN DECLINED. I have doubt about our leaders that any of them had read or noticed the above version of Lenin.
............By saying that we are following "Marxism; Leninism" we should have follow anything ideas of Marx and Lenin; otherwise our claims will not function. The population of India is above 135 crores; and we can count why Indian working class neglecting or reluctant to admit our movement and they are not ready to vote us. As long as our target is to promote capitalism; (there is no socialism) (in what name is not the problem) Indian working class will not admit a "wage slavery system"; because they are not fools.
So I request please take steps to change our PROGRAMME as a SOCIALIST INDIA and then only our movement is on actual Marxism, then only we have a target to be achieved; surely MARXISM will show its real force in India as had done in old Soviet Union and China.
............Since 1950s there are no target to be achieved before Indian Working Class; as "capitalism" cannot be considered as a target. In India; we can avoid only armed revolution; as a strong PARLIAMENTARY system is prevailing; but this facility was not prevailing in old Russia. We can avoid only armed revolution; but hooliganism and rowdyism must be handled on the same coin. As long as we are continuing the concept to promote Indian capitalism; our "PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC REVOLUTION" is only "WAGE SLAVERY". IN THE SAME BOOK IN PAGE 20 COM. EMS SAYS THAT "WHEN SOCIALIST TRANSFORMATION FROM CAPITALISM TO SOCIALISM IN WORLD LEVEL IS TAKING PLACE; INDIA WILL ALSO IN SOCIALISM.". OUR BASIC STAND IS THIS. THIS WAS THE STAND OF TROTSKI (TO MY INFORMATION) WHICH LENIN DECLINED." and Indian working class or poor peoples will not co-operate with us. As long as our stand to promote capitalism continues; will help only COMMUNAL FORCES and INDIAN AND FOREIGN CORPORATES; we will not reach anywhere.
..........In CAPITALISM; bourgeois will decide who should rule them. They will never admit a COMMUNIST PARTY to rule them. Convince the stage of the party also. Only bourgeois democracy will exist as long as CAPITALISM existing. .
..............(FIRST PUBLISHED THIS BLOG WAS ON 17TH MARCH, 2015).
അഭിപ്രായങ്ങളൊന്നുമില്ല:
ഒരു അഭിപ്രായം പോസ്റ്റ് ചെയ്യൂ