344. ONLY MARXISM ADMITTING MALE/FEMALE EQUALITY.
/
Only "MARXISM" admitting "FEMALE" equal to "MALE" as according to nature, it considered only "reproduction" in all living things. In nature "HUMAN BEINGS" only one among living things///
.
/
The
Indian Constitution ensures gender equality through several articles.
Key clauses include Article 14, which guarantees equality before the law
and equal protection
of the laws, Article 15, which prohibits discrimination based on sex,
and Article 16, which ensures equal opportunities in employment. Article
15(3) allows for special provisions in favor of women. Additionally,
Articles 39(a) and (d) promote equal access to livelihood and equal pay
for equal work.
//
ALL RELIGIOUS BOOKS CONTAINS ONLY "SCIENCE" UP TO ITS PERIOD. SO IN ALL RELIGIOUS BOOKS, SUN IS NOT A STAR OR EARTH IS NOT THE SHAPE OF GLOB OR IT ROTATING THE SUN. ONLY FOOLS WILL CONFIRM IN RELIGIOUS BOOKS.
SO ALL FOOLS ARE BELIEVING IN HEAVEN AND HELL.
////
Even though according to the Constitution of India there are equality in male and female; the society is going on according to the concept of religious attitude only. While nature is considering only reproduction among living things; there are degradation only in human beings through the writings of religious books. We knew religious books wrote by somebody only through their imagination. We knew the history of humanity is starting from Prehistoric age; and then there were only human beings; not any kind of god or languages were existed. Actually everybody can see that the "nature" doing things in every field really wonderful and in female body; not only in human beings; but also all kind of female bodies created so as to suitable to bear a new baby in it and everything had made there for the creation of a baby. In human being; menstruation is only a symbol of normal functioning of female body enabling her for pregnancy and if it is abnormal means that the body is not suitable for giving birth for new generation. Here, we must consider that those who wrote such articles in religious books were considered that giving birth to babies as crimes? Why they considered that "female" as only an instrument of "sexual" dealings? Why they treated "menstruation" as a crime of female? Only ignorance or cruelty?
//
According to Chapter IX, Slog 32, of Bhagatvat Gita; Ladies, Vyshyas and Shudras are not eligible for "MOKSHA. " (here, we must understand that "ladies" including Brahmin Ladies denied "moksha" while male "Brahmins" were placed at the top of the society). Only Brahmins and Kshathriyas are eligible for Moksha as per BG, Chapter 9; Sloga 32. (Actually there are no heaven in the sky; only space; but 99% peoples believing that there are something there). The sufferings of "Sita" in "Ramayana" story, also only a part of ill treatment to ladies in general. "Panchali", a female character of Mahabharatha; treated as wife of 5 male characters also a kind of female torturing only.
. It is very pitty that the ladies of "AFGHANISTHAAN" not allowed to live according to their normal willingness and they are not allowed even to participate in sports, being singer and those participated in earlier were killed by shooting. The contents of "KHURAN" was actually only the ideas of Mohammed, as before or after the period of Mohammed, no ideas of "GOD" coming out from anybody. Why GOD reluctant to advice anything after the period of Mohammed is nobody considering. Those who are following the words of "KHURAN" with regard to ladies, is admitting and enjoying all other facilities available in modern life; is actually against justice, otherwise they should come forward to admit justice to ladies with equal status as gents. They should admit that GOD only considered the existence of human race and it is possible only through male and female.
.......As per Bible; ladies are cursed due to persuading to eat an apple which "GOD" declined to eat.
What "MANU" had imagined; became the contents of "Manu's Smruithi".
What Veda Vyasa had imagined became the contents of "Maha bharatha".
What Moses had imagined became the contents of Bible.
What Muhamed had imagined became the contents of "Khuran".
Some religious books considering female beings are just "agricultural farm" and those who farming can decide the method of farming according to their choice meanwhile in another book, female beings holding the curse of god due to eating some fruits which god resisted to eat .
........"Nature" wants only existence of living things by reproduction; male body also planned so as to suitable and supporting to female body. While giving birth to a new baby; nature considered all the risk in it and "she" will be helpless; and male body created some more strength than female body. "He" should protect her even from the attack of other animals; etc. So, not only in human beings, all other "male" things have more strength and even weapon like male "elephant" have tusks.
........But unfortunately, all religions considering that this is a punishment which "GOD" given to ladies. It is a fact religious books of all religions were written by "male" figures and they wrote according to their understandings of their period. And also it is a fact every scripts of each period will reflect the social knowledge of their time. Even though they enjoyed "sex", they showed only utter negligence towards female, while "she" were their partner and companion always. We can presume that those religious scripts wrote in ancient times, they were ignorant about the peculiarities of female body which "nature" provided, and Veda Vyasa wrote his famous work "MAHA BHARATHA" and he himself narrated about his birth as mother;
"MATHSYA GANDHI", mother of Veda Vyasa were born from the belly of a fish.
Even in the modern society and the scientific growth is in enormous stage; almost everybody seeing female only under the concept of religious attitude.
// 07 06 2020// .@@@@@.
(Dialectical Materialism is SCIENTIFIC APPROACH of social subjects. Anything; which can be scientifically proved will be admitted by Dialectical Materialism. Materials are the base of ideas and ideas will influence material level also. The basic tenets of dialectical materialism are: that everything that exists is material and is derived from matter; that matter is in a process and constant change; and that all matter is interconnected and independent. For example; positive and negative are inevitable parts of electricity. Life of everybody are between birth and death. Every action has an opposite reaction).
. . .
340. CLIMAX OF RAMAYANA.
(Study on the base of Dialectical Materialism)
...........At the end of RAMAYANA story, Sri. Rama establishing a KINGDOM on the base of FOUR CASTE SYSTEM and BRAHMINS are the top and SHUDRAS became of lowest; and they should have done the duty of servants of other THREE VARNAS OF "VARNASHRAMA". According to the base of four caste system, SHUDRAS are not eligible for "MOKSHA" and when a Shudra, named SHAMPUKA started "THAPAS", for geting Moksha, Sri. Rama cut away the head of Shampuka. Hanuman, a close supporter of Sri. Rama was also killed by Rama on the instruction of Viswamithra as Hanuman also not included in the eligible group of Moksha since it was reserved only for Brahmins and Kshathriyas. (See Google). According to Chapter IX, Sloga 32, of Bhagatvat Geetha; Ladies, Vyshyas and Shudras are not eligible for "MOKSHA" (here, we must understand that "ladies" including Brahmin Ladies while male "Brahmins" were placed at the top of the society). All religions are treating female as degraded than male. The sufferings of "Sita" in "Ramayana" also only a part of ill treatment to ladies in general. Here, we must consider that those who wrote such articles were considered that giving birth to babies was a crime? Why they considered that "female" as only an instrument of "sexual" dealings? Why they treated "mensus" as a crime of female? Only ignorance or cruelty?
...........It was known that the Author of "RAMAYANA" is "Valmiki"; was a "Wild Man" but actually he was a Brahmin; named Agni Sharma (Valmiki was born as Agni Sharma to a Brahmin named Pracheta (also known as Sumali) of Bhrigu gotra). (Google). Actual intention of its author was only to establish the Four caste system (VARNASHRAMA OF MANU IN "MANUSMRUTHI". And also Shudras are not eligible to get knowledge. Then how is it possible a Wildman (Valmiki) could write up a wonderful Sanskrit story like "Ramayana"? And also the author of Ramayana should have the geographical knowledge of India with Sri Lanka and Himalaya as "Hanuman" of Ramayana flew from Lanka to Himalaya and returned with a mountain to Sri Lanka; though he hadn't helped Sri. Rama to get in Lanka for recapturing his wife Sita.
.........According to Ramayana, Hanuman, a strong supporter of Sri. Rama was the son of "AIR". Actually, we know what is "AIR" which we are breathing. Air, containing with oxygen; hydrogen; carbon dioxide; nitrogen (78.09%) etc. Only fools can believe that AIR can gave birth to anything. And also in Maha Bharatha; Bheema was born also the son of AIR. Why Veda Vyasa declined Brahma, the creater of the world according to Manu, in Manu smruthy? Instead Vyasa erected Vishnu over all other gods. It is too cruel. According to Manu, Brahma came out from a golden egg. Actually Brahma means Brahmana. According to Manu smruthy, Shudras have no right to earn money, because if he earned money (wealth) he will not do slavery duty of other 3 varnas. In future, probably, bjp will show more strictness in these items.
Why MANU ignorant about Sri. Rama or Maha Vishnu? In Manu's smruthy, there is only Brahma.
Maha Vishnu is responsible only to Veda Vyasa? Brahma also should have more importance according to his range.
Only acute fools can believe "AIR" can gave birth to anything. Unfortunately, at present the basic foundation of Indian politics is vested on such foolish ideas and understandings. And the net result is that the exploitation on working class reached at the top as working hours of labours decided as 12 hours raising from 8 hours which had been established for over one century.
..........Anybody can write stories with any subjects. But if it is dealing with the life of human beings; it can't be taken up a story or comedy. The 4 caste system of India made up only some foolishness with dealing such as born from the face of somebody cannot consider as story or comedy. As it is dealt with the social life, it can be solved only narrating actual facts among common peoples.
........Actual intention of bourgeois and elite groups are only increase the rate of exploitation and they will find out so many plans and tactics to cheat working class by dividing them in so many ways and one tactics is organising them on the base of caste or religion. Actually we cannot find the word "Hindu" anywhere in Indian Purana, only establishing the supremacy of Brahmins. But a large number of employees and workers gathered in the caste and religion based trade unions, and a huge quantity is gathered in the name of bms. It is only possible to save them from the exploitation of bourgeois and elite groups, they must be united for a target of exploiktation free social system; a SOCIALIST INDIA.
(If Party leaders narrating story of Ramayana, without actual intention of the author, that will only strengthening in 4 caste system, and certainly it will only help BJP)
........09 05 2020......
അഭിപ്രായങ്ങളൊന്നുമില്ല:
ഒരു അഭിപ്രായം പോസ്റ്റ് ചെയ്യൂ