216. FIGHT AGAINST CAPITALISM
Even though Karl Marx invented MARXISM only to ERADICATE capitalism; in India; since 1950s, it was decided to promote Indian capitalism under the leadership of S A DANGE. As the matter continued about 66 years; almost all Comrades are under the understandings that actual MARXISM is promoting CAPITALISM. On this stand; LDF Government of Bengal under the leadership of Com. Budhadeb during 2008; captured about 9000 farmers agricultural land for starting a car factory and gave them to TATA. ONLY ON THIS; ABOUT 90% OF THE PEOPLES OF BENGAL became against LDF of Bengal. The leaders of Bengal (only a few) considering that CLASS STRUGGLE OF MARXISM is against WORKING CLASS AND POOR PEOPLES; THEY ARE STANDING FOR BOURGEOIS AND BOURGEOIS POLITICAL PARTIES. On this basis; Com. S M of Bengal said during last LA election to Bengal; if LDF returns to power; TATA will start their car factory. According to CPIM leaders of Bengal; promoting capitalism is Marxism; and CPIM only should stand with bourgeois; they are adamant in CAPITALISM and trying to make coalition with Indian National Congress. Even Com. EMS also said for the "FREE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM" (in his book "ARTS AND SCIENCE OF WORKING CLASS POLITICS" PAGE 21) it is impossible to correct them that Karl Marx invented MARXISM only to eradicate capitalism. Their understandings is that we can implement "PEOPLES DEMOCRACY" IN CAPITALISM. I don't know how can we understand them that "PEOPLES DEMOCRACY" IS POSSIBLE ONLY WITH SOCIALISM AS IN CHINA; WHERE IT IS WITH SOCIALISM. The understandings of Karl Marx from his early studies of the society; that only economical structure of the country will decide its upper structure and while promoting CAPITALISM (bourgeois like TATA; BIRLA; AMBANI; ADANI; etc. CORPORATES of India; we cannot decline their influence in economical structure and bourgeois parties like CONGRESS AND BJP are under their control. The economical policies of bourgeois political parties are almost the same and there is no difference in this regard in CONGRESS OR BJP.
I am trying to change this attitude of CPIM since 2002 and I had sent 22 letters to Com.Harkishan Singh Surjeet; then General Secretary of CPIM when I understood that promoting capitalism is the economic policy of CPIM and which was continued from 1950s; and the action of Com. Budhadeb Bhattacharya by deciding to render all help to TATA to start a car factory; and also a part of that decision; in 1957 the first Communist Govt. in Kerala rendered all help to start "MAVOOR RAYONS" to BIRLA; and both TATA & BIRLA are the so called bourgeois of India.
While decided to promote INDIAN CAPITALISM; actual MARXISM derailed from INDIAN COMMUNIST MOVEMENT. From the experience of last 67 years; we can understand that even 1% of Indian population is not with Indian Communist movement as it is above 125 crores or above. For their (The leaders of 1950s of Indian Communist movement) decision to promote CAPITALISM; they have so many reasons; and to postpone a SOCIALIST society; but everything are baseless when compared to actual facts. At present I am requesting the LEADERS OF COMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIA (MARXIST) (IN WHICH MOVEMENT I AM SUPPORTING) TO CHANGE THE ATTITUDE TOWARDS CAPITALISM AND KINDLY EXAMINE IN THE NEXT PARTY CONGRESS TO CHANGE THE PARTY "PROGRAM" BY ADMITTING A "SOCIALIST ECONOMY THROUGH "PEOPLES" DEMOCRACY. I am presenting everything in various blogs in my "PAGE" .. "HARIHARAKURUP & SOCIALISM"; .. "MARXIST IDEOLOGY".. ETC. GROUPS AND PAGES AND permitted time lines of my FB friends.
I think that the attitude of Bengal Comrades (IT SEEMS ONLY A FEW) is deadly against to admit a SOCIALIST ECONOMY THROUGH PEOPLES DEMOCRACY. I request all COMRADES kindly try to change their attitude to make coalition with CONGRESS; even though they are showing some tricks as our old SA DANGE had done and we have a very good example how DANGE and their team (CPI) faced in the history. I consider that their acts is only for securing CAPITALISM which is deadly against MARXISM on which CPIM movement is going on. The basic ideas of CLASS STRUGGLE THEORY; MARXIAN ECONOMY: AND MATERIALISM AND DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM is invented only to eradicate the CAPITALIST STRUCTURE OF THE SOCIETY TO A SOCIALIST SOCIETY; we must consider the fight is only against CAPITALISM without considering those who are handling it.
Even though Karl Marx invented MARXISM only to ERADICATE capitalism; in India; since 1950s, it was decided to promote Indian capitalism under the leadership of S A DANGE. As the matter continued about 66 years; almost all Comrades are under the understandings that actual MARXISM is promoting CAPITALISM. On this stand; LDF Government of Bengal under the leadership of Com. Budhadeb during 2008; captured about 9000 farmers agricultural land for starting a car factory and gave them to TATA. ONLY ON THIS; ABOUT 90% OF THE PEOPLES OF BENGAL became against LDF of Bengal. The leaders of Bengal (only a few) considering that CLASS STRUGGLE OF MARXISM is against WORKING CLASS AND POOR PEOPLES; THEY ARE STANDING FOR BOURGEOIS AND BOURGEOIS POLITICAL PARTIES. On this basis; Com. S M of Bengal said during last LA election to Bengal; if LDF returns to power; TATA will start their car factory. According to CPIM leaders of Bengal; promoting capitalism is Marxism; and CPIM only should stand with bourgeois; they are adamant in CAPITALISM and trying to make coalition with Indian National Congress. Even Com. EMS also said for the "FREE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPITALISM" (in his book "ARTS AND SCIENCE OF WORKING CLASS POLITICS" PAGE 21) it is impossible to correct them that Karl Marx invented MARXISM only to eradicate capitalism. Their understandings is that we can implement "PEOPLES DEMOCRACY" IN CAPITALISM. I don't know how can we understand them that "PEOPLES DEMOCRACY" IS POSSIBLE ONLY WITH SOCIALISM AS IN CHINA; WHERE IT IS WITH SOCIALISM. The understandings of Karl Marx from his early studies of the society; that only economical structure of the country will decide its upper structure and while promoting CAPITALISM (bourgeois like TATA; BIRLA; AMBANI; ADANI; etc. CORPORATES of India; we cannot decline their influence in economical structure and bourgeois parties like CONGRESS AND BJP are under their control. The economical policies of bourgeois political parties are almost the same and there is no difference in this regard in CONGRESS OR BJP.
I am trying to change this attitude of CPIM since 2002 and I had sent 22 letters to Com.Harkishan Singh Surjeet; then General Secretary of CPIM when I understood that promoting capitalism is the economic policy of CPIM and which was continued from 1950s; and the action of Com. Budhadeb Bhattacharya by deciding to render all help to TATA to start a car factory; and also a part of that decision; in 1957 the first Communist Govt. in Kerala rendered all help to start "MAVOOR RAYONS" to BIRLA; and both TATA & BIRLA are the so called bourgeois of India.
While decided to promote INDIAN CAPITALISM; actual MARXISM derailed from INDIAN COMMUNIST MOVEMENT. From the experience of last 67 years; we can understand that even 1% of Indian population is not with Indian Communist movement as it is above 125 crores or above. For their (The leaders of 1950s of Indian Communist movement) decision to promote CAPITALISM; they have so many reasons; and to postpone a SOCIALIST society; but everything are baseless when compared to actual facts. At present I am requesting the LEADERS OF COMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIA (MARXIST) (IN WHICH MOVEMENT I AM SUPPORTING) TO CHANGE THE ATTITUDE TOWARDS CAPITALISM AND KINDLY EXAMINE IN THE NEXT PARTY CONGRESS TO CHANGE THE PARTY "PROGRAM" BY ADMITTING A "SOCIALIST ECONOMY THROUGH "PEOPLES" DEMOCRACY. I am presenting everything in various blogs in my "PAGE" .. "HARIHARAKURUP & SOCIALISM"; .. "MARXIST IDEOLOGY".. ETC. GROUPS AND PAGES AND permitted time lines of my FB friends.
I think that the attitude of Bengal Comrades (IT SEEMS ONLY A FEW) is deadly against to admit a SOCIALIST ECONOMY THROUGH PEOPLES DEMOCRACY. I request all COMRADES kindly try to change their attitude to make coalition with CONGRESS; even though they are showing some tricks as our old SA DANGE had done and we have a very good example how DANGE and their team (CPI) faced in the history. I consider that their acts is only for securing CAPITALISM which is deadly against MARXISM on which CPIM movement is going on. The basic ideas of CLASS STRUGGLE THEORY; MARXIAN ECONOMY: AND MATERIALISM AND DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM is invented only to eradicate the CAPITALIST STRUCTURE OF THE SOCIETY TO A SOCIALIST SOCIETY; we must consider the fight is only against CAPITALISM without considering those who are handling it.
അഭിപ്രായങ്ങളൊന്നുമില്ല:
ഒരു അഭിപ്രായം പോസ്റ്റ് ചെയ്യൂ