217. As General Secretary; Com.Sitaram Yechuri is liable to keep up the basic stand of CPIM as since 1964; CPIM is against coalition with Indian National Congress. It was the issue of split in Communist Movement of India. When the then Chairman of Communist Party of India; Sri. SA Dange and others decided to make coalition with INC; Com. EMS; AKG; Jyoti Basu; etc. Comrades came out of the then National Council and formed the new Communist Party and that is Communist Party of India (MARXIST). After the formation of CPIM; about 70% or more Party Members stood on the side of CPIM and the history of CPI made it clear that the decision of SA DANGE and OTHERS were utter failure. SO THE HISTORY OF OLD NATIONAL COUNCIL ALSO PROVED THAT DECISION OF S A DANGE AND OTHERS WAS AGAINST THE INTEREST OF INDIAN WORKING CLASS. But now Com. Yechuri is trying how to dismantle the political stability of CPIM. If he is not admitting the base of CPIM, he should resign the post of General Secretary of CPIM as those who actually not convinced the political base of the Party; he cannot perform the duty as General Secretary of the Party successfully. Why he is considering Bengal Comrades as his weakness? It is impossible in each State; each Policy in CPIM; otherwise Comrades of other States will also take their own way.
The main fact in it is that COM. YECHURI is not admitting that bourgeois and bourgeois political parties will come in CLASS STRUGGLE THEORY OF MARXISM; AND WHEN WE ARE DECIDING TO ESTABLISH A SOCIALIST SOCIETY; WE SHOULD HAVE JEOPARDIZE THE BOURGEOIS STRUCTURE OF ECONOMY AND THEIR SUPREMACY. A "GENERAL SECRETARY" OF THE PARTY SHOULD NOT THINK THAT HE CAN DO ANYTHING, EVEN WITHOUT CONSIDERING THE BASIC IDEOLOGIES OF MARXISM, AND WITHOUT EACH AND EVERY MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY, OTHERWISE, HE DOESN'T REPRESENTING THEM, HE IS ONLY "A MAN".
...........THERE SHOULD BE ONLY ONE DOCUMENT IN THE NAME OF CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF CPIM; BUT THAT SHOULD BE ONLY ADMITTING MARXIAN IDEOLOGY AND SAFEGUARDING THE INTEREST OF WORKING CLASS AND 135 CRORES OF INDIAN CITIZENS. ANYBODY CAN PLACE ANY DOCUMENT IN THE PARTY CONGRESS; BUT THAT SHOULD NOT BE IN THE NAME OF POLIT BUREAU OR CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF COMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIA (MARXIST).
2. WITHOUT MAKING ANY KIND OF POLITICAL COALITION OR POLITICAL UNDERSTANDINGS WITH INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS OR ANY OTHER BOURGEOIS POLITICAL PARTIES; COMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIA (MARXIST) CAN TAKE A STAND THAT WHO MUST WIN IN ANY GENERAL ELECTION AND WHO MUST BE DEFEATED. NO DOUBT; BJP SHOULD BE DEFEATED; AND WHEREVER NO CPIM OR IT SUPPORTING CANDIDATES; VOTE CAN BE DONE FOR INC. BUT THERE SHOULD NOT BE WITH JOINT PLATFORM WITH THEM. HERE WE MUST CONSIDER THAT THE THREAT OF BJP WILL NOT END EVEN AT LEAST 500 YEARS. IS IT POSSIBLE TO CONSIDER OUR POLITICS ONLY FOR 5 YEARS OR 10 YEARS? AFTER ALL; CPIM LEADERS SHOULD ANSWER TO CPI LEADERS FOR THE SPLIT HAPPENED DURING 1964; WHICH WAS ONLY ON THE ISSUE OF COALITION WITH INC.
. .Yechuri considering "CORRUPTION" of everybody as ornaments to them and so he is very much pleased to be coalition with INC and he never use corruption as weapon to anybody. Then how we can claim as CPIM is against corruption and how we can use "CORRUPTION FREE POLITICS IN INDIA" as weapon against Indian BOURGEOIS and in POLITICS?
. . Without understanding "DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM" even the top leaders of the Party, it is impossible to implement in the working class movement. Karl Marx could understood the contradictions in the interests between the slave and the master and between the worker and the employer. Karl Marx could understood the power when working class all over the world gathering together, so Marx exhorted the world working class: "Unite, you have nothing to lose, but you have a great world to gain." But unfortunately, for a hundred years since working, the "communist" leaders in India do not seem to understand it.
. .According to Karl Marx, "Class Contradictions" were started from the beginning of "slavery system" and "private property system". Karl Marx could understood the contradictions in the interests between the slave and the master and between the worker and the employer. Actually, the primary cause of formation of "GOVERNMENT" (Administrative structure) were the contradictions and the then exploiters found that legal and established rules were also necessary for maintaining slavery system. As the cause of exploitation is to make profit more and more; the exploitation will be at the maximum; and Karl Marx found that only when the economic supremacy of bourgeois continuing, working class can't escape from the exploitation. And he insisted that only demolishing the economic supremacy of bourgeois, working class can escape from the chain of exploitation.
. . . Eventhough Communist movements functioning in India for one century, it is very sorry to say that without admitting the target of SOCIALIST INDIA, the existence of WORKING CLASS MOVEMENT IN INDIA AND ALSO THE FUTURE OF ABOUT 135 Crores Indians will be in very dangerous situation. And also it means that Indian Working Class can never escape from the exploitation of bourgeois, through a SOCIALIST society? Here, we should see the actual fact that this is not a simple political issue, but decision on this is related to the future of INDIA and above 135 Crores of Indian CITIZENS. Without making clarity on this, the issue is admitting the theory of MARXISM is YES OR NO. If the answer is NO, it means that we are not admitting MARXISM.
...22 12 2017...
അഭിപ്രായങ്ങളൊന്നുമില്ല:
ഒരു അഭിപ്രായം പോസ്റ്റ് ചെയ്യൂ