Unity of CPI AND CPIM should not to promote Indian CAPITALISM. Indian BOURGEOIS are keen to exploit working class and farmers more and more and INC and BJP are one to RED FLAG and MARXIAN IDEOLOGY IN TOTAL. If admitting SOCIALISM in Indian model, RED FLAG can wipe out exploiters from Indian soil USING THEIR VOTE alone. Remember Dr AMBEDKAR had resigned from NEHRU MINISTRY
IN 1951 SEPTEMER itself.
//
The
total ideological base of CPI(M) PB disclosed about MARXISM when the
old CPIM General Secretary Sitaram Yechuri said during the Assembly
Elections to Bihar in 2020 August that "ONLY INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS
CAN SAVE INDIA". He knew nothing about the reasons of the split in
the Communist Party in 1964 which was based on the class nature of
Indian National Congress. The admitted base of INC is that it
representing the bourgeois and landlords of India. 500 local kings and
their siblings are the actual base of INC and INC always protecting
them in each and every items. It is the reason that INC always keen to
prevent the growth of WORKING CLASS POLITICS in India even in Kerala,
even killing its workers whenever it possible. Each and every PB
members and C C members admitted the words of Yechuri as MARXISM and
they are still going on based on Yechuri. It is not the fault of them,
because they knew only about MARXISM is promoting capitalism. When he was re-elected as General Secretary at the 23rd Party Congress that followed, the "Party
Congress" itself approved Sitaram Yechury's stance. The other Politburo
members were not able to understand the broader meaning of his
position. But the broader meaning was that there are no need for the
CPI(M) to exist if it was incapable of saving India. The 24th Party
Congress also reiterated Yechury's stance. It is clear that the CPI(M)'s
votes will be wiped out in the upcoming elections if the Indian
National Congress uses Sitaram Yechury's words wisely. The Congress will
campaign by saying that the CPI(M)'s stance is that "only the Indian
National Congress can save India." That is the CPI(M)'s position-- its
name is "Broad Secular Alliance." It only means that the CPI(M)
Politburo members have no connection with Marxism...means that there are
"NO CLASS ENEMIES". No matter how many requests are made that the party
program should change; that socialism should be accepted as an Indian
model, there is no other reason for not considering it.
//
The
CPI(M) Politburo now has no connection with Marxism, having continued
to promote capitalism for a very long time. Therefore, if it is saying
to the CPI(M) Politburo that the Left coalition in India can defeat the
Hindutva BJP in India by 2029 itself,
if it is accepted "SOCIALISM IN THE INDIAN MODEL" it would not be even
slightly convincing. Therefore, Harihara Kurup, who says that, will not
be allowed to say even a single word except through social media. We
can defeat BJP in the G E OF 2029 ITSELF ONLY USING DEMOCRACY. CPIM PB
actually don't know what is actual democracy. Only we want admitting
SOCIALISM in INDIAN MODEL. Then the ruling of INDIA WILL BE RED
FLAG. But the steps have to be started as early as possible. Those who understand MARXISM can tell it in any public gathering
and the common man understand actual MARXISM. But not possible
through social media. Now saying to the public only the development and
there are no working class politics. The CPI(M) Politburo is
steadfast in the political folly of handing over the governance of India
to the Indian National Congress, which will never be viable.
//
It
is said that the Communist movement in India in the 1950s took the
position that Indian capitalism should be promoted, but only for a short
time. Even that was not recorded in the "program". That was done in the
form of a "point of view". Even that was only to overcome the position
of some comrades who called for "armed revolution". But none of those
who were there at that time are alive now. Moreover, the idea that those
who should reach the party leadership should only come through student
organizations was also part of the idea that capitalism should be
promoted. So when they enter the party and rise to the Politburo, no one
can insist that they have a commitment to the philosophy of Marxism and
the working class. Certainly, their integrity will be to bourgeois.
"Politics" has become a mere part of existence. Such people should
continue to lead the party as long as they can. All those who are
incapable of writing a single sentence of their own do is simply change
the dates of previous ones. That is what is happening at all party
congresses now. The decision to "strengthen the party" will be made at
every party congress. Everything else will be business as usual. It
doesn't matter to anyone whether the party is getting stronger or not.
//
Capitalism does not need a communist party; we should learn from the experiences of the past 75 years since 1950 that there will never be a party. But the truth is that those who say so have no such interest. Anyway, to reach the age, to leave. The same goes for those who repeating. Because they don't know what Marxism is or for which class or for what purpose it was formulated. If K Damodaran and EMS had understood the class contradictions, they would not have adopted the class cooperation stance of promoting capitalism. (The slave owner's interest was to make as much money as possible using the slave. There was no understanding that the slave was a human being. The slave had no right to say he was thirsty or hungry. The modern bourgeoisie is the successor of the old slave owner. The bourgeoisie's stance towards workers, including Dalits, is the same as that of the old slave owner.) Promoting capitalism is promoting the old slave owner. The hostile stance of the Indian National Congress and the Hindutva BJP towards the Communist Party is only a clear proof of that. Following mere escapism. The party classes they get are only for capitalist growth. That is what the 24th CPI(M) Party Congress has decided. "Broad Secular Alliance". The nature of criticisms will never touch the P B Members, because they know nobody will do nothing to them. It is only part of the decision to never accept the political goal of socialism. Because if such a goal is to be possible at any time, the working class and the common people must be prepared for it. Part of the "broad secular alliance" underlying the Indian National Congress's commitment to governing India is its adherence to capitalism alone. The current political situation in India will not change in five or fifty years. Otherwise the political goal of a SOCIALIST INDIA should be taken up by the Communist movements in India. Such a possibility cannot be expected from those who came to power through student organizations.
//
The Indian Communist Movement in the 1950s, which had a vision of "promoting capitalism", was a mistake in understanding class contradictions. No such mistakes were made in old Russia or China.
The error of that time still exists. The real class conflict is the conflict between the interests of the slave owner and the interests of the slave. When the slave system existed, the slave owner's interest was how to exploit the slave. The current worker is the continuation of the old slave. To support the current bourgeoisie is to support the old slave owner. No one who accepts Marxism can agree with it. When you support the old slave owner; when you promote capitalism, there will be no class enemies. That is what happen when there is an alliance with the Indian National Congress from 2016. Hindutva BJP needs only to change; the political leadership of the old princes and aristocrats of India since the 1950s -- the Indian National Congress -- can continue their exploitative nature forever. This is what the 24th CPI(M) Party Congress decided - "Broad Secular Alliance". Fully cooperate with the transfer of all assets in public sector enterprises to corporates. Take a stand that the goal of a socialist India will never be accepted.
//
CAN THE CPI( M) POLIT BUREAU DECIDE ANY THING?
/
CPI(M) PB is hardworking to restore INC in its old state, replacing Hindhuthwa BJP as the ruling Party of INDIA. But not ready to request VOTE for a SOCIALIST INDIA, for the last 75 years since 1950s asking vote for CAPITALISM. See we have history of ONE CENTURY. Because don't know the difference of CAPITALISM and SOCIALISM. Means know nothing about MARXISM. On the other hand, INC is hard working to become INDIA a RED FLAG FREE COUNTRY, and also as much as possible BJP SHOULD EXIST FOR EVER.
//
The current Party Congress decision is that the CPI(M) Politburo can decide anything, neglecting of what discussions take place at Party Conferences. They can decide anything because they don't know what Marxism is; what capitalism is; what class struggle is; what its purpose is; it is against whom; who are the "class enemies" are; and how the class struggle will end. They are not obliged to accept the existing Party Program also. They also do not accept the Indian Constitution. That is the reason they do not accept the political goal of a Socialist India in any way. "CLASS STRUGGLE" will end only when SOCIALIST SOCIETY established. But when Promoting capitalism? Poor knowledge of everything.
//
The fact is that CPIM Politburo does not accept the CPI(M) Party Program also. Nowhere in the party program does it say that capitalism should be promoted. But that is what has been given the most importance for the last 75 years since 1950. As part of the explanation of paragraph 6.2, it is said that capitalism is at a stage where it should be promoted after the part "Taking into account the level of economic development". Actually there are no such words shown in the Party Program. So nobody can find it without hearing the explanation. But for the last 75 years, since 1950s, Indian Communist movements giving top priority for promoting capitalism. Actually then, those leaders were considered only the development in industrial sector. But, later the thing changed as capitalism in its utmost effect including corruption, Communalism; including Indian National Congress itself.
//
One must be who understands a few things the difference between the growth during the prohibition era in India from 1920-25 to 1950 and the growth in the 75 years from 1950 to 2025, when there were no obstacles to work. No one can understand the situation where working class politics is the protector of the exploiting classes. Only consider those who say so as enemies. A very strange mental state. Until 1950, the real working class was the foundation. What is exploitation and how to be free from it; What is a social system free from exploitation; Who is the exploiting class; Who are the class enemies; the real working class was taught what class struggle is; what class co-operation is, etc. The party class in an old movie teaches - "It's not labor that is exploited, it's labor power." After the 1950s, when it was decided to promote exploitation, old-style classes became impossible. When the decision was made that the party's leadership should only come from student organizations, even the connection with the real working class was lost. Those who are able to obtain higher education are mostly from the wealthy classes. It is difficult for them to even understand the interests of the working class. When such things happened for a long time, it became the party's conscience that the only duty of the party is to promote capitalism.
//
Now promoting HINDHUTHWA BJP also, when not admitting the target of SOCIALIST INDIA. Because when admitting the target of SOCIALIST INDIA, we are targeting to remove bourgeois structure of "GOVERNMENT" itself. Without understanding what is "MARXISM" it is to hard to convince that MARXISM is capable for it;; but impossible to convince CPIM PB.
//
A generation of the communist movement in India, including Comrade EMS, worked hard to break the monopoly of power of the Indian National Congress, the political leadership of the exploiting classes in India. The Congress took the position that working-class politics should not exist in India because it was the demand of the exploiting classes in India that working-class politics should not exist in India under any circumstances. It is well known that the "liberation struggle" against the Communist Government that came to power in Kerala in 1957 and its removal from power was to protect the "right to huts" of poor agricultural workers. They have made all the obstacles against the Left government, including in Bengal. Unfortunately, the decision of the CPI(M) 24th Party Congress was to eliminate the rule of Hindutva in India and hand over the rule of India to the Indian National Congress again.
//
Anyone with common sense will understand that the term "broad secular coalition" was used only to fool party members. That, in turn, was tried in 2019 and 2024 and proved to be a failure. The political stance that a Communist Movement that embraces Marxism should adopt is to gain the people's approval for a socialist state, as recognized by the Indian Constitution. A Communist Party which working according to Marxian ideology should have obligation as per "Party Program" 8.9, which has a history of activity in India of more than a hundred years. To hand over the rule of India to the exploiting classes without doing so is to commit a grave betrayal of the Indian working class and to declare that it does not accept Marxism. It will not reach the path of socialism. The position that there are no class enemies is relevant here. It only declares that CPI(M) not following the ideology MARXISM. No one will vote for the Communist Party to allow the Indian National Congress to rule India. That way, the party will not grow. But neither the Congress nor the BJP has any compromise on the fact that there should be no communist party in India. CPI(M) PB also in the same manner even neglecting the experience of 2019 and 2024 in Indian Parliament Elections. Hence I request please boycott participating in Indian Parliament Election in future so as to avoid the physical hardships of Party Comrades.
//
Ignoring
the critic Harihara Kurup and treating him as an enemy is not a serious
matter. Criticizing through SOCIAL MEDIA because no other way to
protect a country and 140 peoples of the country, other than social
media. To CPIM PB the ideology of Karl Marx is only "free development of
capitalism" and protecting the interests of Indian bourgeois. NOBODY
CAN ADMIT WHEN SAYING THAT WE SHOULD GIVE IMPORTANCE OF KARL MARX'
IDEAS, NOT TO HIS PHOTOS. NONE OF CPI(M) PB MEMBERS KNEW ANYTHING AS
IDEAS OF KARL MARX. SO THEY ARE SEEING HARIHARA KURUP AS THEIR ENEMY
BECAUSE HE IS CRITICIZING AND EVERYTHING CAN BE SOLVED THROUGH IGNORING
HIM. When requesting to admit "SOCIALISM IN INDIAN MODEL", because
to protect Indian peoples from HINDHUTHWA BJP, the only solution using
MARXIAN IDEOLOGY and also SOCIALISM being a part of Indian
Constitution, CPIM PB cannot admit as the contents suggested by
Harihara kurup. And also the understandings of MARXISM is only for
CAPITALISM.
അഭിപ്രായങ്ങളൊന്നുമില്ല:
ഒരു അഭിപ്രായം പോസ്റ്റ് ചെയ്യൂ